JCB logo
Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc.
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 2564K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dubinsky, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Elson, E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dubinsky, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Elson, E. L.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol 109, 1733-1743, Copyright © 1989 by The Rockefeller University Press

ARTICLES

Formation of acetylcholine receptor clusters in chick myotubes: migration or new insertion?

JM Dubinsky, DJ Loftus, GD Fischbach and EL Elson
Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110.

Experiments were performed to study the feasibility of two mechanisms of acetylcholine receptor (ACHR) accumulation in chick myotubes: diffusion and trapping of previously dispersed surface receptors and localized insertion of new receptors at accumulation sites. Fluorescence photobleaching recovery (FPR) measurements indicated that the majority of diffusely distributed ACHRs in chick myotube membranes were mobile whereas nearly all receptors within high density clusters were effectively immobile. Unlike previous reports, two rates of ACHR movement characterized the mobile population. Moreover, we found that the estimated diffusion coefficient depended critically on the objective (spot size) used to assay recovery from bleaching. Implications of this finding for mechanisms of receptor immobilization are discussed. Extracts of chick brain, known to increase the number of surface receptors, did not alter receptor mobility. Extracts of Torpedo electric organ that increase the number of receptor aggregates, decreased the mobile fraction of ACHRs. Simulations of the diffusion and trapping mechanism indicated that captured receptors should congregate around the periphery of a receptor patch during the first hour after they were inserted into the membrane. However, newly inserted ACHRs were found to be located centrally within receptor patches under neurites, and this was not consistent with an exclusive diffusion-trapping mechanism. We also studied the mobility of ACHRs near points of contact made by cholinergic growth cones. The rate of receptor movement was increased in the vicinity of growth cones, but the magnitude of this effect was small.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents