JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1214K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zaner, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Valberg, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zaner, K. S.
Right arrow Articles by Valberg, P. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol 109, 2233-2243, Copyright © 1989 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLES

Viscoelasticity of F-actin measured with magnetic microparticles

KS Zaner and PA Valberg
Hematology-Oncology Section, Boston City Hospital, Massachusetts.

Dispersed submicroscopic magnetic particles were used to probe viscoelasticity for cytoplasm and purified components of cytoplasm. An externally applied magnetic field exerted force on particles in cells, in filamentous actin (F-actin) solutions, or in F-actin gels formed by the addition of the actin gelation factor, actin-binding protein (ABP). The particle response to magnetic torque can be related to the viscoelastic properties of the fluids. We compared data obtained on F- actin by the magnetic particle method with data obtained on F-actin by means of a sliding plane viscoelastometer. F-actin solutions had a significant elasticity, which increased by 20-fold when gels were formed by ABP addition. Both methods gave consistent results, but the dispersed magnetic particles indicated quantitatively greater rigidity than the viscoelastometer (two and six times greater for F-actin solutions and for F-actin plus ABP gels, respectively). These differences may be due to the fact that, compared with traditional microrheometers, dispersed particle measurements are less affected by long-range heterogeneity or domain-like structure. The magnetometric method was used to examine the mechanical properties of cytoplasm within intact macrophages; the application of the same magnetometric technique to both cells and well-defined, purified protein systems is a first step toward interpreting the results obtained for living cells in molecular terms. The magnetic particle probe system is an effective nonoptical technique for determining the motile and mechanical properties of cells in vitro and in vivo.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents