JCB logo
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1237K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sun, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Devreotes, P. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sun, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Devreotes, P. N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol 110, 1549-1554, Copyright © 1990 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLES

Surface cAMP receptors mediate multiple responses during development in Dictyostelium: evidenced by antisense mutagenesis

TJ Sun, PJ Van Haastert and PN Devreotes
Department of Biological Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.

Cell surface cAMP receptors (cARs) have been implicated in multiple aspects of development in Dictyostelium. Antisense mutagenesis has recently provided strong evidence that cARs are necessary for aggregation (Klein et al., 1988. Science (Wash. DC). 241:1467-1472). We show here that the expression of cAR1 antisense mRNA which prevents the appearance of cAR1 antigen also prevents the expression of cAMP-binding activity and blocks multiple cAMP-mediated responses. Chemotactic sensitivity to cAMP was lost as were stimulus-induced cAMP and cGMP production. Furthermore, the expression of developmentally regulated marker genes, dependent on repeated cAMP stimulation, was altered. As a result, the developmental program was severely impaired; most of the cells failed to aggregate and undergo further differentiation.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents