JCB logo
Quantitative Colocalization Analysis Software
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1404K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Simon, S. I.
Right arrow Articles by Sklar, L. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Simon, S. I.
Right arrow Articles by Sklar, L. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol 111, Issue 6 2747-2756, Copyright © 1990 by The Rockefeller University Press

ARTICLES

Flow cytometric analysis and modeling of cell-cell adhesive interactions: the neutrophil as a model

SI Simon, JD Chambers and LA Sklar
Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque 87131.

The immune function of granulocytes, monocytes, lymphocytes, and other specialized cells depends upon intercellular adhesion. In many cases the molecules mediating leukocyte cell adhesion belong to the Leu-CAM superfamily of adhesive molecules. To elucidate the events of homotypic aggregation in a quantitative fashion, we have examined the aggregation of neutrophils stimulated with formyl peptides, where aggregate formation is a transient reversible cell function. We have mathematically modeled the kinetics of aggregation using a linear model based on particle geometry and rates of aggregate formation and breakup. The time course was modeled as a three-phase process, each phase with distinct rate constants. Aggregate formation was measured on the flow cytometer; singlets and larger particles were distinguished using the intravital stain LDS-751. Aggregation proceeded rapidly after stimulation with formyl peptide (CHO-nle-leu-phe-nle-tyr-lys). The first phase lasted 30-60 s; this was modeled with the largest aggregation rate and smallest rate of disaggregation. Aggregate formation plateaued during the second phase which lasted up to 2.5 min. This phase was modeled with an aggregation rate nearly an order of magnitude less than that of the initial fast phase, whereas the disaggregation rate for this phase did not change significantly. A third phase where disaggregation predominated, lasted the remaining 2-3 min and was modeled with a four to fivefold increase of the disaggregation rate. The mechanism of cell-cell adhesion in the plateau phase was probed with the monoclonal antibody IB4 to the CD18 subunit of the adhesive receptor CR3. Based on these studies it appears that new aggregates do not form to a large degree after the first phase of aggregate formation is complete. However, new adhesive contact sites may form within the contact region of these adherent cells to keep the aggregates together.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents