JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1010K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nilsson, I.
Right arrow Articles by von Heijne, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nilsson, I.
Right arrow Articles by von Heijne, G.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Substance via MeSH
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol 126, 1127-1132, Copyright © 1994 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLES

The COOH-terminal ends of internal signal and signal-anchor sequences are positioned differently in the ER translocase

I Nilsson, P Whitley and G von Heijne
Karolinska Institute Center for Structural Biochemistry, NOVUM, Huddinge, Sweden.

Signal peptides (SPs) target proteins to the secretory pathway and are cleaved from the nascent chain once the translocase in the ER has been engaged. Signal-anchor (SA) sequences also interact transiently with the ER translocase, but are not cleaved and move laterally out of the translocase to become permanent membrane anchors. One obvious difference between SP and SA sequences is the considerably longer hydrophobic regions (h regions) of the latter. To study the interaction between SP/SA sequences and the ER translocase, we have constructed signal sequences with poly-Leu h regions ranging in length from 8 to 29 residues and have characterized their locations within the translocase using both a new assay that measures the minimum number of amino acids needed to span the distance between the COOH-terminal end of the h region and the active site of the oligosaccharyl transferase enzyme and an assay where the efficiency of signal peptidase catalyzed cleavage is measured. Our results suggest that SP and SA sequences are positioned differently in the ER translocase.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents