|
||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


* Departments of Medicine and Cell Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine and Veterans Affairs Medical Center,
Nashville, Tennessee 37232-2279; and EGF precursor (proEGF) is a member of the
family of membrane-anchored EGF-like growth factors
that bind with high affinity to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). In contrast to human transforming growth factor-
Department of Biochemistry, Kanazawa Medical University, Uchinada, Ishikawa
920-02, Japan
precursor (proTGF
), which is
sorted basolaterally in Madin-Darby canine kidney
(MDCK) cells (Dempsey, P., and R. Coffey, 1994. J. Biol. Chem. 269:16878-16889), we now demonstrate
that human proEGF overexpressed in MDCK cells is
found predominantly at the apical membrane domain
under steady-state conditions. Nascent proEGF (185 kD) is not sorted but is delivered equally to the apical
and basolateral membranes, where it is proteolytically cleaved within its ectodomain to release a soluble 170-kD
EGF form into the medium. Unlike the fate of TGF
in
MDCK cells, the soluble 170-kD EGF species accumulates in the medium, does not interact with the EGFR,
and is not processed to the mature 6-kD peptide. We
show that the rate of ectodomain cleavage of 185-kD proEGF is fourfold greater at the basolateral surface
than at the apical surface and is sensitive to a metalloprotease inhibitor, batimastat. Batimastat dramatically
inhibited the release of soluble 170-kD EGF into the
apical and basal medium by 7 and 60%, respectively, and caused a concordant increase in the expression of
185-kD proEGF at the apical and basolateral cell surfaces of 150 and 280%, respectively. We propose that
preferential ectodomain cleavage at the basolateral surface contributes to apical domain localization of 185-kD proEGF in MDCK cells, and this provides a novel
mechanism to achieve a polarized distribution of cell
surface membrane proteins under steady-state conditions. In addition, differences in disposition of EGF and
TGF
in polarized epithelial cells offer a new conceptual framework to consider the actions of these
polypeptide growth factors.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|