Published 23 June 2003. doi:10.1083/jcb.200301147
© The Rockefeller University Press,
0021-9525/2003/6/1029 $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 161, Number 6, 1029-1034
Dynamic instability of microtubules is regulated by force
Marcel E. Janson,
Mathilde E. de Dood and
Marileen Dogterom
FOM Institute for Atomic and Molecular Physics, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, Netherlands
Address correspondence to Marileen Dogterom, FOM Institute for Atomic and Molecular Physics (AMOLF), Kruislaan 407, 1098 SJ Amsterdam, Netherlands. Tel.: 31-20-6081234. Fax: 31-20-6684106. E-mail: dogterom{at}amolf.nl
Microtubules are long filamentous protein structures that randomly alternate between periods of elongation and shortening in a process termed dynamic instability. The average time a microtubule spends in an elongation phase, known as the catastrophe time, is regulated by the biochemical machinery of the cell throughout the cell cycle. In this light, observed changes in the catastrophe time near cellular boundaries (Brunner, D., and P. Nurse. 2000. Cell. 102:695704; Komarova, Y.A., I.A. Vorobjev, and G.G. Borisy. 2002. J. Cell Sci. 115:35273539) may be attributed to regulatory effects of localized proteins. Here, we argue that the pushing force generated by a microtubule when growing against a cellular object may itself provide a regulatory mechanism of the catastrophe time. We observed an up to 20-fold, force-dependent decrease in the catastrophe time when microtubules grown from purified tubulin were polymerizing against microfabricated barriers. Comparison with catastrophe times for microtubules growing freely at different tubulin concentrations leads us to conclude that force reduces the catastrophe time only by limiting the rate of tubulin addition.
Key Words: microtubules; dynamic instability; force generation; catastrophe time; polymerization
The online version of this article includes supplemental material.
* Abbreviation used in this paper: MT, microtubule.

CiteULike
Complore
Connotea
Del.icio.us
Digg
Reddit
Technorati What's this?
Related Article
-
Catastrophe under pressure
- Nicole LeBrasseur
J. Cell Biol. 2003 161: 1006-1007.
[Full Text]
[PDF]
This article has been cited by other articles:
-
Bicek, A. D., Tuzel, E., Demtchouk, A., Uppalapati, M., Hancock, W. O., Kroll, D. M., Odde, D. J.
(2009). Anterograde Microtubule Transport Drives Microtubule Bending in LLC-PK1 Epithelial Cells. Mol. Biol. Cell
20: 2943-2953
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Odell, G. M., Foe, V. E.
(2008). An agent-based model contrasts opposite effects of dynamic and stable microtubules on cleavage furrow positioning. JCB
183: 471-483
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Laan, L., Husson, J., Munteanu, E. L., Kerssemakers, J. W. J., Dogterom, M.
(2008). Force-generation and dynamic instability of microtubule bundles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
105: 8920-8925
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Efimov, A., Schiefermeier, N., Grigoriev, I., Brown, M. C., Turner, C. E., Small, J. V., Kaverina, I.
(2008). Paxillin-dependent stimulation of microtubule catastrophes at focal adhesion sites. J. Cell Sci.
121: 196-204
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Gregoretti, I. V., Margolin, G., Alber, M. S., Goodson, H. V.
(2006). Insights into cytoskeletal behavior from computational modeling of dynamic microtubules in a cell-like environment. J. Cell Sci.
119: 4781-4788
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Schaffner, S. C., Jose, J. V.
(2006). Biophysical model of self-organized spindle formation patterns without centrosomes and kinetochores. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
103: 11166-11171
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Asbury, C. L., Gestaut, D. R., Powers, A. F., Franck, A. D., Davis, T. N.
(2006). The Dam1 kinetochore complex harnesses microtubule dynamics to produce force and movement. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
103: 9873-9878
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Zimmerman, S., Chang, F.
(2005). Effects of {gamma}-Tubulin Complex Proteins on Microtubule Nucleation and Catastrophe in Fission Yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell
16: 2719-2733
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Mimori-Kiyosue, Y., Grigoriev, I., Lansbergen, G., Sasaki, H., Matsui, C., Severin, F., Galjart, N., Grosveld, F., Vorobjev, I., Tsukita, S., Akhmanova, A.
(2005). CLASP1 and CLASP2 bind to EB1 and regulate microtubule plus-end dynamics at the cell cortex. JCB
168: 141-153
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Dixit, R., Cyr, R.
(2004). Encounters between Dynamic Cortical Microtubules Promote Ordering of the Cortical Array through Angle-Dependent Modifications of Microtubule Behavior. Plant Cell
16: 3274-3284
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Van Bruaene, N., Joss, G., Van Oostveldt, P.
(2004). Reorganization and in Vivo Dynamics of Microtubules during Arabidopsis Root Hair Development. Plant Physiol.
136: 3905-3919
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Kovar, D. R., Pollard, T. D.
(2004). From the Cover: Insertional assembly of actin filament barbed ends in association with formins produces piconewton forces. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA
101: 14725-14730
[Abstract]
[Full Text]
-
Karabay, A., Yu, W., Solowska, J. M., Baird, D. H., Baas, P. W.
(2004). Axonal Growth Is Sensitive to the Levels of Katanin, a Protein That Severs Microtubules. J. Neurosci.
24: 5778-5788
[Abstract]
[Full Text]