JCB logo
MBL International Tel: 800.200.5459 CLICK HERE
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 24 January 2005. doi:10.1083/jcb.200405117
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 168, Number 3, 365-373
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1978K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gribnau, J.
Right arrow Articles by Jaenisch, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gribnau, J.
Right arrow Articles by Jaenisch, R.
Right arrowPubmed/NCBI databases
*Gene*GEO Profiles
*UniGene
*Substance via MeSH
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Article

X chromosome choice occurs independently of asynchronous replication timing



Joost Gribnau2, Sandra Luikenhuis1,2, Konrad Hochedlinger2, Kim Monkhorst2, and Rudolf Jaenisch1,2

1 Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
2 Whitehead Institute for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA 02142

Correspondence to R. Jaenisch: jaenisch{at}wi.mit.edu

In mammals, dosage compensation is achieved by X chromosome inactivation in female cells. Xist is required and sufficient for X inactivation, and Xist gene deletions result in completely skewed X inactivation. In this work, we analyzed skewing of X inactivation in mice with an Xist deletion encompassing sequence 5 KB upstream of the promoter through exon 3. We found that this mutation results in primary nonrandom X inactivation in which the wild-type X chromosome is always chosen for inactivation. To understand the molecular mechanisms that affect choice, we analyzed the role of replication timing in X inactivation choice. We found that the two Xist alleles and all regions tested on the X chromosome replicate asynchronously before the start of X inactivation. However, analysis of replication timing in cell lines with skewed X inactivation showed no preference for one of the two Xist alleles to replicate early in S-phase before the onset of X inactivation, indicating that asynchronous replication timing does not play a role in skewing of X inactivation.

J. Gribnau and S. Luikenhuis contributed equally to this work.

J. Gribnau's and K. Monkhorst's present address is Dept. of Cell Biology, Erasmus MC, 3015 GE Rotterdam, Netherlands.

Abbreviations used in this paper: cas, castaneus; dpc, days past coitum; ES, embryonic stem; MEF, mouse embryonic fibroblast; SD, single-double; Xa, active X; Xce, X controlling element; Xi, inactive X; Xic, X inactivation center.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents