JCB logo
Carestream Gel Logic 212PRO
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 13 November 2006. doi:10.1083/jcb.200605001
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 175, Number 4, 647-659
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 4575K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Stanners, C. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nicholson, T. B.
Right arrow Articles by Stanners, C. P.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Article

Specific inhibition of GPI-anchored protein function by homing and self-association of specific GPI anchors



Thomas B. Nicholson and Clifford P. Stanners

McGill Cancer Centre and Biochemistry Department, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada H3G 1Y6

Correspondence to Clifford P. Stanners: cliff.stanners{at}mcgill.ca

The functional specificity conferred by glycophosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchors on certain membrane proteins may arise from their occupancy of specific membrane microdomains. We show that membrane proteins with noninteractive external domains attached to the same carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) GPI anchor, but not to unrelated neural cell adhesion molecule GPI anchors, colocalize on the cell surface, confirming that the GPI anchor mediates association with specific membrane domains and providing a mechanism for specific signaling. This directed targeting was exploited by coexpressing an external domain-defective protein with a functional protein, both with the CEA GPI anchor. The result was a complete loss of signaling capabilities (through integrin–ECM interaction) and cellular effect (differentiation blockage) of the active protein, which involved an alteration of the size of the microdomains occupied by the active protein. This work clarifies how the GPI anchor can determine protein function, while offering a novel method for its modulation.

Abbreviations used in this paper: CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CC1, CEA-related cell adhesion molecule CEACAM1; Fn, fibronectin; GPI, glycophosphatidylinositol; IP, immunoprecipitation; MßCD, methyl-ß-cyclodextrin; NCAM, neural cell adhesion molecule; TM, transmembrane; Vn, vitronectin.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?

Related Article

Togetherness, molecular style
Mitch Leslie
J. Cell Biol. 2006 175: 516. [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents