JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 718K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leighton, F.
Right arrow Articles by De Duve, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leighton, F.
Right arrow Articles by De Duve, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?
The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol 41, 521-535, Copyright © 1969 by Rockefeller University Press

ARTICLE

THE SYNTHESIS AND TURNOVER OF RAT LIVER PEROXISOMES

: I. Fractionation of Peroxisome Proteins



Federico Leighton 1, Brian Poole 1, Paul B. Lazarow 1, and Christian De Duve 1

1 From The Rockefeller University, New York 10021.

Dr. Leighton's present address is Department of Pathological Physiology, Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile. Dr. Poole's present address is Laboratoire de Morphologie Animale, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium

Rat liver peroxisomes isolated by density gradient centrifugation were disrupted at pH 9, and subdivided into a soluble fraction containing 90% of their total proteins and virtually all of their catalase, D-amino acid oxidase, L-alpha-hydroxy acid oxidase and isocitrate dehydrogenase activities, and a core fraction containing urate oxidase and 10% of the total proteins. The soluble proteins were chromatographed on Sephadex G-200, diethylaminoethyl (DEAE)-cellulose, hydroxylapatite, and sulfoethyl (SE)-Sephadex. None of these methods provided complete separation of the protein components, but these could be distributed into peaks in which the specific activities of different enzymes were substantially increased. Catalase, D-amino acid oxidase, and L-alpha-hydroxy acid oxidase contribute a maximum of 16, 2, and 4%, respectively, of the protein of the peroxisome. The contribution of isocitrate dehydrogenase could be as much as 25%, but is probably much less. After dissolution of the cores at pH 11 , no separation between their urate oxidase activity and their protein was achieved by Sephadex G-200 chromatography.

Submitted on October 10, 1968
Revised on December 9, 1968


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents