JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1632K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McGuffee, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Skipper, B. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by McGuffee, L. J.
Right arrow Articles by Skipper, B. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol 90, 201-210, Copyright © 1981 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLES

A 45Ca autoradiographic and stereological study of freeze-dried smooth muscle of the guinea pig vas deferens

LJ McGuffee, L Hurwitz, SA Little and BE Skipper

In an effort to more clearly elucidate the role of cellular structures as calcium sinks and sources in smooth muscle cells, the intracellular distribution of radioactive calcium was evaluated by a new method based on freeze-drying. The guinea pig vas deferens was exposed to a physiological salt solution that contained 45Ca. The muscle was then freeze-dried and prepared for electron microscope autoradiography. The grain density over the plasma membrane, mitochondria, and sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) was significantly greater than that of the matrix. These results suggest that the plasma membrane, mitochondria and SR have the capacity to accumulate calcium. Which of these structures serve as a source of calcium for contraction remains to be determined. A stereological comparison between freeze-dried and conventionally prepared smooth muscles revealed several differences. The cross- sectional area of freeze-dried cells was about twice that of conventionally prepared cells. Moreover, mitochondria and sub-surface vesicles occupied a significantly smaller percentage of the cell in the freeze-dried tissue than they did in the conventionally prepared tissue.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?




  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents