JCB logo
R&D Systems: New Poster Available
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 947K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sieber, F.
Right arrow Articles by Roseman, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sieber, F.
Right arrow Articles by Roseman, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol 90, 55-62, Copyright © 1981 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLES

Quantitative analysis of intercellular adhesive specificity in freshly explanted and cultured cells

F Sieber and S Roseman

A new method is presented for the quantitative analysis of intercellular adhesive specificity. In this assay, two cell types are mixed, one unlabeled and the other labeled with the fluorescent dye, fluorescamine [4-phenylspiro(feran-2[3H],1'-phthalan)-3,3'-dione]. The resulting aggregates are analyzed by fluorescence microscopy to determine the number of labeled and unlabeled cells per aggregate. Random (nonspecific) aggregation was characterized by a binomial distribution, and adhesive specificity was accordingly quantified by the deviation (as determined by a chi-square test) from the calculated binomial distribution. The labeling procedure was simple and rapid, and experiments with 18 different cell types showed that it did not affect cell viability, morphology, rate and extent of adhesion, plating efficiency, and the capability of myogenic cells to undergo terminal differentiation. Most important, assays with morphologically identifiable cell pairs indicated that the fluorescent label neither induced apparent nor destroyed existing adhesive specificity. The most pronounced adhesive specificities were observed with freshly explanted cells from adult tissues and also with mixtures of simian virus 40- transformed and nontransformed BALB/c 3T3 cells. A glucosamine-6- phosphate N-acetylase-deficient mutant 3T3 line (AD6), however, aggregated randomly with parental 3T3 cells. Lectin-resistant mutant Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells displayed marginal adhesive specificity when mixed with normal CHO cells.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents