JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 5887K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Letourneau, P. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Letourneau, P. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Journal of Cell Biology, Vol 97, 963-973, Copyright © 1983 by The Rockefeller University Press


ARTICLES

Differences in the organization of actin in the growth cones compared with the neurites of cultured neurons from chick embryos

PC Letourneau

Sensory neurons from chick embryos were cultured on substrata that support neurite growth, and were fixed and prepared for both cytochemical localization of actin and electron microscopic observation of actin filaments in whole-mounted specimens. Samples of cells were treated with the detergent Triton X-100 before, during, or after fixation with glutaraldehyde to determine the organization of actin in simpler preparations of extracted cytoskeletons. Antibodies to actin and a fluorescent derivative of phallacidin bound strongly to the leading margins of growth cones, but in neurites the binding of these markers for actin was very weak. This was true in all cases of Triton X- 100 treatment, even when cells were extracted for 4 min before fixation. In whole-mounted cytoskeletons there were bundles and networks of 6-7-nm filaments in leading edges of growth cones but very few 6-7-n filaments were present among the microtubules and neurofilaments in the cytoskeletons of neurites. These filaments, which are prominent in growth cones, were identified as actin because they were stabilized against detergent extraction by the presence of phallacidin or the heavy meromyosin and S1 fragments of myosin. In addition, heavy meromyosin and S1 decorated these filaments as expected for binding to F-actin. Microtubules extended into growth cone margins and terminated within the network of actin filaments and bundles. Interactions between microtubule ends and these actin filaments may account for the frequently observed alignment of microtubules with filopodia at the growth cone margins.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:



  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents