|
||
© The Rockefeller University Press,
0021-9525/1997//1355 $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 137, Number 6,
, 1997 1355-1367
Article |
Amphiphysin II (SH3P9; BIN1), a Member of the Amphiphysin/Rvs Family, Is Concentrated in the Cortical Cytomatrix of Axon Initial Segments and Nodes of Ranvier in Brain and around T Tubules in Skeletal Muscle
Amphiphysin (amphiphysin I), a dominant autoantigen in paraneoplastic Stiff-man syndrome, is a neuronal protein highly concentrated in nerve terminals, where it has a putative role in endocytosis. The yeast homologue of amphiphysin, Rvs167, has pleiotropic functions, including a role in endocytosis and in actin dynamics, suggesting that amphiphysin may also be implicated in the function of the presynaptic actin cytoskeleton. We report here the characterization of a second mammalian amphiphysin gene, amphiphysin II (SH3P9; BIN1), which encodes products primarily expressed in skeletal muscle and brain, as differentially spliced isoforms. In skeletal muscle, amphiphysin II is concentrated around T tubules, while in brain it is concentrated in the cytomatrix beneath the plasmamembrane of axon initial segments and nodes of Ranvier. In both these locations, amphiphysin II is colocalized with splice variants of ankyrin3 (ankyrinG), a component of the actin cytomatrix. In the same regions, the presence of clathrin has been reported. These findings support the hypothesis that, even in mammalian cells, amphiphysin/Rvs family members have a role both in endocytosis and in actin function and suggest that distinct amphiphysin isoforms contribute to define distinct domains of the cortical cytoplasm. Since amphiphysin II (BIN1) was reported to interact with Myc, it may also be implicated in a signaling pathway linking the cortical cytoplasm to nuclear function.
Amphiphysin I, a human autoantigen in Stiff-man syndrome associated with breast cancer (De Camilli et al., 1993; Folli et al., 1993), is a neuronal protein highly concentrated in the cortical cytomatrix of nerve terminals where it has a putative role in synaptic vesicle endocytosis (Lichte et al., 1992; David et al., 1994, 1996; Shupliakov et al., 1997). It comprises an NH2-terminal region, which is predicted to form coiled coil structures, a COOHterminal SH3 domain, and a proline-rich linker region between these two domains that is poorly conserved evolutionarily (David et al., 1994). Biochemical studies, complemented by colocalization and coimmunoprecipitation experiments, have strongly suggested that the two main physiological ligands for the SH3 domain of amphiphysin I are the GTPase dynamin I (David et al., 1996; Grabs et al., 1997) and the inositol–5-phosphatase synaptojanin (McPherson et al., 1996). Dynamin I participates in synaptic vesicle recycling via its critical role in the fission of clathrincoated vesicles from the nerve terminal plasmalemma (Kosaka and Ikeda, 1983; Koenig and Ikeda, 1989; Shpetner and Vallee, 1989; Takei et al., 1995), and synaptojanin is thought to function in a closely related step (McPherson et al., 1996). In addition, amphiphysin I interacts in vitro, via a region distinct from its SH3 domain, with the appendage domain of the
subunit of the clathrin adaptor AP2 (Wang et al., 1995; David et al., 1996). It has, therefore, been suggested that one of the functions of amphiphysin I is to recruit dynamin I and synaptojanin at the clathrin coat of synaptic vesicles (David et al., 1996). Consistent with this hypothesis, disruption of amphiphysin SH3 domain interactions in living nerve terminals produces a potent block of synaptic vesicle endocytosis at the stage of deeply invaginated clathrin coated pits (Shupliakov et al., 1997).
Amphiphysin I shares substantial primary sequence similarity and a similar domain structure, with the yeast protein Rvs167. Furthermore, the NH2-terminal portion of both proteins is similar to the yeast protein Rvs161 (Bauer et al., 1993; David et al., 1994; Sivadon et al., 1995). Mutations in either RVS161 or RVS167 block receptor-mediated and fluid phase endocytosis in yeast, strongly supporting a role of the Amphiphysin/Rvs family in endocytic processes (Munn et al., 1995). In addition, RVS161 and RVS167 mutants also exhibit defects in the function of the actin cytoskeleton, in agreement with the general link between actin and endocytosis that has emerged from yeast studies (Munn et al., 1995; Sivadon et al., 1995). A corresponding link between amphiphysin I and the function of the actin cytoskeleton has been suggested by studies in cultured hippocampal neurons (Mundigl O., C. Ochoa, C. David, A.K. Kabanov, and P. De Camilli. Mol. Biol. Cell (Suppl.). 7:84a.). Finally, rvs mutants impair the ability of yeast cells to enter stationary phase upon exposure to nutrient starvation (reduced viability upon starvation) suggesting an indirect role of the RVS genes in controlling cell proliferation (Crouzet et al., 1991; David et al., 1994).
Amphiphysin I is expressed at a high concentration in brain and testis, at a lower concentration in neuroendocrine tissues (De Camilli et al., 1993; Folli et al., 1993; Lichte et al., 1992), and at only much lower levels in most other tissues (Butler, M.H., S. Floyd, and P. De Camilli, unpublished results). We have characterized here the product of a second amphiphysin gene, which we refer to as amphiphysin II. Amphiphysin II is localized primarily in specialized regions of the cortical cytoplasm of axons and muscle cells. These observations add further evidence for a general connection between proteins of the amphiphysin/Rvs family and the function of the cortical cell cytoskeleton.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
DNA Cloning
By searching the database for amphiphysin I homologues, a sequence of 289 bp was identified from a human muscle library with 76% identity to the COOH-terminal region of human amphiphysin I. (These sequence data are available from Genbank/EMBL/DDBJ under accession Z24784.) A probe corresponding to the first 251 bp of this sequence was amplified by PCR (forward primer 5'-cccaagcacgactacacggc-3'; reverse primer 5'ggaggaggtgttcttcacacgc-3') from a human skeletal muscle cDNA library constructed in
ZAPII phage (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The probe was then radioactively labeled by primer-direct labeling (Bogue et al., 1994) and used to screen 2 x 106 plaques of the same library. The two longest clones isolated by the screen (clones 17-42 and 12-1A) were partially characterized by restriction mapping and found to overlap extensively. Both clones were fully sequenced, and clone 17-42 was found to encode a nearly full length protein, missing only three amino acids at its COOH-terminal end. Subsequent searches of the database revealed additional expressed sequence tag (EST) sequences from a human infant brain library that were identical to portions of our clone 17-42. Clones 24660, 30686, and 27466 (Genbank/EMBL/DDBJ T80281, R18250 and R12992, respectively) were obtained through the IMAGE Consortium (Research Genetics Inc., Huntsville, AL) and fully sequenced. A human brain cDNA library constructed in
gt11 (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) was then screened with a 220bp probe amplified by PCR (forward primer 5'-cttggggagggtggccccg-3'; reverse primer 5'-agcaagctcaaccagaacc-3') and labeled by primer-direct labeling. 26 positive plaques out of 1 x 106 were identified, and the two longest clones (clone 11 and clone 19) were fully sequenced. These clones were identical to the IMAGE cDNA clones mentioned above, except for some additional alternative splicings (see Fig. 1 B). Since none of the clones isolated encoded an entire reading frame, the full length clones were assembled as follows starting from the two longest clones. Clone 17/12 (see Fig. 1 C) was assembled from clone 17-42 by replacing its COOH terminus with that of clone 12-1A using the SapI restriction site. Clone 17/19 (see Fig. 1 C) was assembled from clone 19 (Genbank/EMBL/DDBJ U87558) by replacing its NH2-terminal region with that of clone 17-42 at the unique restriction site BsaAI. Nucleotide sequences were analyzed by Blast and Fasta and aligned by Bestfit and Pileup (Genetics Computer Group, Madison, WI). Chromatograms from sequencing analysis were assembled by Seqman (DNASTAR, Inc., Madison, WI). Coiled coil structure identification was performed using Coils 2.2 (Lupas, 1996).
|
Cell Transfection
COS-7 cells were transiently transfected with cDNAs corresponding to either clone 17/12 or clone 17/19 (see Fig. 1 C). The two cDNAs were subcloned in pcDNA3 (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA) and then purified with a Maxiprep kit (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA). COS-7 cells (American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD) were transfected with lipofectamine (GIBCO BRL, Gaithersburg, MD), according to standard procedures (Chen and Okayama, 1987). Triton X-100 extracts of transfected cells and untransfected COS-7 cells were harvested after 24 h and analyzed by SDSPAGE and Western blotting.
Immunocytochemistry
Light microscopy.
Rat brains were fixed and frozen sectioned as described (De Camilli et al., 1983). Small fragments of rat soleus skeletal muscle were incubated in relaxing media (100 mM Hepes, 100 mM potassium propionate, 3 mM MgCl, 5 mM EGTA, 15 mM phosphocreatine, 2 mM NaATP; Kaufman et al., 1990) at room temperature for 10 min. Muscles were then stretched, fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, and semithin sectioned (0.5 mm) on an ultramicrotome (Ultracut FCS; Reichert, Vienna, Austria). Rat muscle and brain sections were stained for indirect immunofluorescence according to De Camilli et al. (1983). Pictures were recorded on black and white films (T-MAX 100; Kodak, Rochester, NY) with a microscope (Axiophot; Zeiss Inc., Thornwood, NY) equipped for epifluorescence microscopy.
Electron microscopy.
Small pieces of rat soleus skeletal muscle were rapidly excised and fixed by immersion in 4% paraformaldehyde in 0.12 M sodium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4. The samples were then infiltrated with polyvinylpyrrolidone/sucrose for 2 h. Ultrathin frozen sections were cut onto an ultramicrotome (Reichert) with FCS attachment and immediately processed for immunogold labeling (10-nm gold) as previously described (Keller et al., 1984; Tokuyasu et al., 1989).
Miscellaneous Procedures
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting were performed essentially as described by Laemmli (1970) and Towbin et al. (1979), respectively. Immunoreactive bands were detected by either alkaline phosphatase conjugated secondary antibodies (Bio Rad, Hercules, CA) or 125I-protein A (105 cpm/ ml; Dupont/NEN, Boston, MA).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A comparative analysis of all these clones suggests that they are derived by alternative splicing from a single gene. The products of this gene will be collectively referred to as amphiphysin II, because of their strong sequence similarity to amphiphysin I. The contiguous amino acid sequence derived from the analysis of the individual human clones is shown in Fig. 1 A. Fig. 1 B is a schematic alignment of the human clones with a mouse sequence (SH3P9) that represents the murine homologue of amphiphysin II and which was obtained during a screen for SH3 domain-containing proteins (Sparks et al., 1996). The partial clones depicted in Fig. 1 B were used to assemble the full length clones 17/12 and 17/19, as shown in Fig. 1 C (see Materials and Methods). These full length clones correspond to two alternative splicing variants of amphiphysin II. Clone 17/12 is identical to BIN1 (with the exception of a single amino acid; see Fig. 1 C, legend), a protein recently identified in a two hybrid screen for MYC-interacting proteins (Sakamuro et al., 1996).
The percentages of similarity and identity between the contiguous sequence of human amphiphysin II (as defined by Fig. 1 A) and human amphiphysin I (David et al., 1994) are 71 and 55%, respectively. Fig. 1 D shows a schematic alignment of the two sequences, as well as the boundaries of the A–D domains as defined previously on the basis of blocks of similarity between the Rvs yeast proteins and human and chicken amphiphysins (David et al., 1994; Fig. 1, legend).
Note that alternatively spliced fragments I and II (Fig. 1 B) of amphiphysin II coincide with gaps in the amphiphysin I sequence, raising the possibility that even the amphiphysin I gene may undergo a similar alternative splicing in this region.
Amphiphysin II Is Primarily Expressed in Brain and Muscle
Northern blot analysis of different tissues with the full length amphiphysin II cDNA (clone 17/12) revealed that skeletal muscle is, by far, the major site of expression of this gene (Fig. 2 A). A major band centered at 2.2 kb was present in this tissue. The same band was present at much lower levels in brain and at an even lower concentration in several other tissues (Fig. 2 A). Several minor transcripts were also visible, including a band of 3 kb in brain. Since the putative alternatively spliced sequence III was only detected in brain clones (Fig. 1 B), we probed a blot identical to that of Fig. 2 A with constructs generated by PCR and corresponding either to this entire sequence (Fig. 1 A, amino acids 350–472) or to its 5' portion (Fig. 1 A, amino acids 350–390). Both probes produced an identical pattern (Fig. 2 B and data not shown) and labeled bands with similar mobility as those labeled by the full length probe (clone 17/12) but with different relative intensities. The most striking difference is a strong labeling of the 3-kb band in brain and the weaker labeling of transcripts migrating at the 2.2-kb region. These observations confirm the preferential inclusion of splice segment III in brain amphiphysin II. No cross-reactivity with amphiphysin I mRNA (major transcript at 4.5 kb [David et al., 1994]) was observed in the high stringency conditions at which the Northern blot analysis was performed.
|
|
Both amphiphysin IIa and IIb were recognized by antibodies directed against either NH2-terminal (CD 9) or COOH-terminal (CD7 and CD8) epitopes. Their different mobility suggests therefore internal alternative splicing. Most likely, this difference reflects the presence of splice fragment III (127 amino acids) in amphiphysin IIa. This hypothesis was supported by the transfection of COS-7 cells with clones 17/12 and 17/19. Amphiphysin II immunoreactivity induced by these transfections comigrated with amphiphysin IIa and IIb, respectively (Fig. 4). The difference of
25 kD between amphiphysin IIa and IIb is more than the difference expected by the inclusion of 127 amino acids. However, it was previously shown that amphiphysin I has an aberrant mobility in SDS-PAGE, migrating significantly slower (
128 kD) than predicted by its amino acid sequence (76 kD; Lichte et al., 1992; David et al., 1994). This aberrant mobility is primarily due to a region (David et al., 1994) that strikingly corresponds to the alternatively spliced region III in amphiphysin II.
|
Localization of Amphiphysin II in the Nervous System
Considering their significant primary sequence similarity, amphiphysin I and II may have overlapping functions in brain. Therefore, we investigated whether these two proteins have a similar subcellular distribution by double immunofluorescence of rat brain frozen sections. Fig. 5 shows a comparison of the localization of amphiphysin I and II in three different gray matter regions of the brain: the cerebral cortex, the hippocampus, and the cerebellum. In all regions, amphiphysin I immunoreactivity (Fig. 5, B, D, and F) has the punctate distribution typical of nerve terminal staining. In contrast, amphiphysin II immunoreactivity occurs in the shape of short segments emerging from neuronal perikarya (Fig. 5, A, C, and E). In each region, the site of emergence of these processes and their shape is consistent with their identification as axon initial segments (Peters et al., 1991). High magnification views indicate that amphiphysin II is strictly confined to the cortical cytoplasm (Fig. 5 A, insets).
|
|
|
Localization of Amphiphysin II in Skeletal Muscle
The light microscopic localization of amphiphysin II in skeletal muscle is illustrated in Fig. 8. Amphiphysin II immunoreactivity appears as transverse striations along the muscle fiber (Fig. 8 A). These striations are within the I band, as shown by counterstaining of actin by fluorescent phalloidin (Fig. 8, B and C), and they flank the Z line, as shown by counterstaining for desmin (Fig. 8, D and E). The amphiphysin II stripes are similar to the stripes of ankyrin3 (ankyrinG) immunoreactivity (Fig. 8, F and G, as shown by double staining of ankyrin3 and actin). Ankyrin3 was previously shown to be concentrated along plasmalemmal T tubules (Flucher et al., 1990). Accordingly, the localization of amphiphysin II was also very similar to that of triadin, a marker of T tubules (Guo et al., 1994; data not shown). Immunoreactivity for clathrin heavy chain (monoclonal antibody X22), which was previously shown to be concentrated in muscle at I bands (Muñoz et al., 1995a,b), formed stripes comprised between the amphiphysin II striations and the Z line, as shown by double staining of amphiphysin II and clathrin (Fig. 8, H and I). The glucose transporter, glut4, a protein that is internalized at least partially via clathrin coated vesicles (Garippa et al., 1996; Robinson et al., 1996), is also localized in proximity of T tubules (Muñoz et al., 1995a). Glut4 immunoreactivity is centered around the M line, as shown by double labeling with anti-glut4 and anti-clathrin antibodies (Fig. 8, J and K).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In brain, amphiphysin I is concentrated in the cortical cytoplasm of nerve terminals where it participates in synaptic vesicle endocytosis (David et al., 1996; Shupliakov et al., 1997). In contrast, amphiphysin II is concentrated in axon initial segments and nodes of Ranvier. The occurrence of clathrin coated pits and clathrin coated invaginations has been reported to occur more frequently at initial segments and nodes of Ranvier than at other locations along the axonal surface, with the exception of nerve terminals (Karlsson, 1967; Campos-Ortega et al., 1968; Conradi, 1969). Thus, an involvement of amphiphysin II in endocytosis is plausible. However, it is unlikely that the high and specific concentration of amphiphysin II present at these sites may be simply related to endocytosis.
A characteristic feature of the cortical cytoplasm at initial segments and nodes of Ranvier is the presence of a dense matrix underlying the plasmalemma (Palay et al., 1968; Conradi, 1969; Waxman and Quick, 1978). This submembranous cytoskeleton may participate in mediating the local enrichment of special adhesion molecules (members of the neurofascin/L1 family; Shiga and Oppenheim, 1991) and of proteins required for the generation and propagation of action potentials, such as Na+ channels (Srinivasan et al., 1988; Waxman and Ritchie, 1993), Na+/K+ ATPase (Nelson and Veshnock, 1987; Waxman and Ritchie, 1993), and Na+/Ca2+ exchangers (Waxman and Ritchie, 1993). The only unique component of this specialized cortical cytomatrix identified so far is a neuron-specific isoform of ankyrin3 (ankyrinG; Kordeli et al., 1995). Neuronal amphiphysin II may be a second component of this matrix. As in the case of amphiphysin II, the isoform of ankyrin expressed at axon initial segments and nodes of Ranvier is generated by alternative splicing of a gene (ankyrin3) that is widely expressed outside the nervous system, and at particularly high concentrations in skeletal muscle (Kordeli et al., 1995).
In skeletal muscle, amphiphysin II is concentrated around the plasmalemma of T tubules, and even here, it colocalizes with ankyrin3, previously shown to be a component of the submembranous cytoskeleton of T tubules (Flucher et al., 1990). Like axon initial segments and nodes of Ranvier, T tubules are enriched in proteins responsible for controlling ion permeability and transport (Lau et al., 1979; Flucher et al., 1990) and a specialized cytomatrix around the T tubules, including both amphiphysin II and ankyrin3, may help to define the composition and function of these plasmalemmal domains (Flucher et al., 1990). T tubules are not typically regarded as sites specialized for endocytosis. However, there is evidence that clathrin-mediated endocytosis may occur at this region. First, clathrin immunoreactivity (detected by monoclonal antibody X22) is present in proximity of T tubules as previously reported (Kaufman et al., 1990) and further confirmed by this study. This clathrin heavy chain is likely to correspond to the skeletal muscle specific clathrin recently described by several groups (Gong et al., 1996; Kedra et al., 1996; Lindsay et al., 1996; Sirotkin et al., 1996). Second, the glut4 transporter, which undergoes regulated surface exposure in response to insulin (Wang et al., 1996) and is internalized at least in part via clathrin coated vesicles (Garippa et al., 1996; Robinson et al., 1996), is concentrated along the T system and surrounding vesicles (Slot et al., 1991; Muñoz et al., 1995a,b).
In yeast, mutations in either the Rvs161 and/or the RVS167 genes produce both endocytosis defects and defects in the function of the peripheral actin cytoskeleton, including abnormal polarity, uneven cell size and morphology, and delocalization of actin patches (Munn et al., 1995; Sivadon et al., 1995). The COOH-terminal region of Rvs167 was identified in a two hybrid screen for actin binding proteins (Amberg et al., 1995). More generally, yeast studies have demonstrated an important role of the actin cytoskeleton in endocytosis, thus raising the possibility that effects of RVS mutations on endocytosis and the peripheral cytoskeleton may be interrelated (Munn and Riezman, 1994; Amberg et al., 1995; Munn et al., 1995).
Our present demonstration that amphiphysin II is localized in the cortical cytomatrix of specialized regions of axons and muscle is consistent with the role of the RVS genes in actin function. A dual role in endocytosis and in the dynamics of the peripheral cytoskeleton may be a general characteristic of amphiphysin/Rvs family proteins. The strong implication of amphiphysin I in synaptic vesicle endocytosis may reflect the unique specialization of the presynaptic actin cytomatrix for this function.
An additional phenotype produced by mutations in the RVS genes is reduced viability upon starvation, a phenotype displayed by an inability of the cell to enter in stationary phase under these conditions (Crouzet et al., 1991; Bauer et al., 1993). Since amphiphysin I was shown to be an autoantigen in breast cancer (De Camilli et al., 1993; David et al., 1994, 1996), it was speculated (David et al., 1994) that proteins of the amphiphysin/Rvs family, like other proteins of the cortical cell cytomatrix that can act as tumor suppressors (Rubinfeld et al., 1993; Tsukita et al., 1993), may be directly implicated in cancer.
While this study was in progress, sequences of amphiphysin II isoforms were independently published in the context of two studies. A first study reported the identification of mouse muscle amphiphysin II during a search for novel SH3-containing proteins (Sparks et al., 1996). This protein (SH3P9) was not further characterized. A second study identified a fragment of murine amphiphysin II in a yeast two hybrid screen for MYC binding proteins (Sakamuro et al., 1996). The authors of this study went on to isolate a human amphiphysin II isoform, BIN1, which is identical to our clone 17/12, and to demonstrate that this protein is localized in the nucleus and has the properties of a tumor suppressor gene. These findings are consistent with the presence of a nuclear localization sequence in BIN1 (Sakamuro et al., 1996), which we show here to be encoded by splice fragment II (Fig. 1 B). In our study, however, we do not have any evidence for a nuclear localization of amphiphysin II in adult muscle or brain. Our results, therefore, argue for a primary function of amphiphysin II in the cytoplasm, although they clearly do not exclude that amphiphysin II may shuttle from the cytoplasm to the nucleus and that it may function in a signaling pathway from the cell periphery to the nucleus. It was shown previously that proteins of the submembranous cytoskeleton (e.g., the tight junction protein ZO1 [Gottardi et al., 1996]) have a nuclear localization under certain conditions. Thus, the possibility that amphiphysin II may participate in nuclear events and even be concentrated in the nucleus under certain functional states cannot be ruled out.
In conclusion, we suggest that amphiphysin/Rvs proteins may play a general role in the physiology of the peripheral cytoskeleton which underlies the plasmalemma. Different isoforms, generated either by distinct genes or by alternative splicing of the same genes, may serve to adapt this general role to specific functions of specialized cell surface domains. Given the central importance of the subplasmalemmal cytomatrix in a variety of cellular processes, including vesicular trafficking to and from the plasmalemma, generation of regional heterogeneity of plasmalemma, signal transduction, and regulation of cell–cell interaction, the components of this matrix are likely to have pleiotropic functions. Further studies of amphiphysin family members may not only reveal new aspects of the function of the peripheral cytoskeleton and endocytosis, but also help elucidate a novel signaling pathway from the cell surface to the nucleus. The reported connection between amphiphysin I autoimmunity and cancer (Folli et al., 1993; De Camilli et al., 1993) suggests that these studies may be of relevance to the biology of at least some forms of human cancer.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This study was supported by grants from the Donaghue Foundation, the Human Frontier Science Program Organization, and the National Institutes of Health (CA46128) to P. De Camilli. D. Grabs was a recipient of a Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst fellowship, C. David of a United States Army Medical Research and Development Command fellowship, and O. Cremona of Telethon and Human Frontier Science Program Organization long-term fellowships.
Submitted: 9 December 1996
Revised: 21 April 1997
M.H. Butler and C. David contributed equally to this work.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Amberg DC, Basart E & Botstein D. Defining protein interactions with yeast actin in vivo, Nat Struct Biol, 1995, 2, 28–35.[Medline]
Bauer F, Urdaci M, Aigle M & Crouzet M. Alteration of a yeast SH3 protein leads to conditional viability with defects in cytoskeletal and budding patterns, Mol Cell Biol, 1993, 13, 5070–5084.
Bogue CW, Gross I, Vasavada H, Dynia DW, Wilson CM & Jacobs HD. Identification of Hox genes in newborn lung and effects of gestational age and retinoic acid on their expression, Am J Physiol, 1994, 266, L448–454.[Medline]
Brodsky FM. Clathrin structure characterized with monoclonal antibodies. I. Analysis of multiple antigenic sites, J Cell Biol, 1985, 101, 2047–2054.
Campos-Ortega JA, Glees P & Neuhoff V. Ultrastructural analysis of individual layers in the lateral geniculate body of the monkey, Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat, 1968, 87, 82–100.[Medline]
Chang YC & Gottlieb DI. Characterization of the proteins purified with monoclonal antibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase, J Neurosci, 1988, 8, 2123–2130.[Abstract]
Chen C & Okayama H. High-efficiency transformation of mammalian cells by plasmid DNA, Mol Cell Biol, 1987, 7, 2745–2752.
Conradi S. Observations on the ultrastructure of the axon hillock and initial axon segment of lumbosacral motoneurons in the cat, Acta Physiol Scand Suppl, 1969, 332, 65–84.[Medline]
Crouzet M, Urdaci M, Dulau L & Aigle M. Yeast mutant affected for viability upon nutrient starvation: characterization and cloning of the RVS161 gene, Yeast, 1991, 7, 727–743.[Medline]
David C, Solimena M & De Camilli P. Autoimmunity in stiff-Man syndrome with breast cancer is targeted to the C-terminal region of human amphiphysin, a protein similar to the yeast proteins, Rvs167 and Rvs161, FEBS (Fed Eur Biochem Soc) Letts, 1994, 351, 73–79.
David C, McPherson PS, Mundigl O & De Camilli P. A role of amphiphysin in synaptic vesicle endocytosis suggested by its binding to dynamin in nerve terminals, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1996, 93, 331–335.
De Camilli P, Cameron R & Greengard P. Synapsin I (protein I), a nerve terminal-specific phosphoprotein. I. Its general distribution in synapses of the central and peripheral nervous system demonstrated by immunofluorescence in frozen and plastic sections, J Cell Biol, 1983, 96, 1337–1354.
De Camilli P, Miller PE, Navone F, Theurkauf WE & Vallee RB. Distribution of microtubule-associated protein 2 in the nervous system of the rat studied by immunofluorescence, Neuroscience, 1984, 11, 817–846.[Medline]
De Camilli P, Thomas A, Cofiell R, Folli F, Lichte B, Piccolo G, Meinck HM, Austoni M, Fassetta G, Bottazzo GF et al.. The synaptic vesicle-associated protein amphiphysin is the 128-kD autoantigen of StiffMan syndrome with breast cancer, J Exp Med, 1993, 178, 2219–2223.
Devarajan P, Stabach PR, Mann AS, Ardito T, Kashgarian M & Morrow JS. Identification of a small cytoplasmic ankyrin (AnkG119) in the kidney and muscle that binds β I
spectrin and associates with the Golgi apparatus, J Cell Biol, 1996, 133, 819–830.
Flucher BE, Morton ME, Froehner SC & Daniels MP. Localization of the
1 and
2 subunits of the dihydropyridine receptor and ankyrin in skeletal muscle triads, Neuron, 1990, 5, 339–351.[Medline]
Folli F, Solimena M, Cofiell R, Austoni M, Tallini G, Fassetta G, Bates D, Cartlidge N, Bottazzo GF, Piccolo G et al.. Autoantibodies to a 128kd synaptic protein in three women with the Stiff-Man syndrome and breast cancer, New Engl J Med, 1993, 328, 546–551.
Garippa RJ, Johnson A, Park J, Petrush RL & McGraw TE. The carboxyl terminus of GLUT4 contains a serine-leucine-leucine sequence that functions as a potent internalization motif in Chinese hamster ovary cells, J Biol Chem, 1996, 271, 20660–20668.
Gong W, Emanuel BS, Collins J, Kim DH, Wang Z, Chen F, Zhang G, Roe B & Budarf ML. A transcription map of the DiGeorge and velocardio-facial syndrome minimal critical region on 22q11, Hum Mol Genet, 1996, 5, 789–800.
Gottardi CJ, Arpin M, Fanning AS & Louvard D. The junction-associated protein, zonula occludens-1, localizes to the nucleus before the maturation and during the remodeling of cell-cell contacts, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1996, 93, 10779–10784.
Grabs D, Slepnev V, Songyang Z, David C, Lynch M, Cantley LC & De Camilli P. The SH3 domain of amphiphysin binds the proline rich domain of dynamin at a single site which defines a new SH3 binding consensus sequence, J Biol Chem, 1997, 272, 13419–13425.
Guo W, Jorgensen AO & Campbell KP. Characterization and ultrastructural localization of a novel 90-kDa protein unique to skeletal muscle junctional sarcoplasmic reticulum, J Biol Chem, 1994, 269, 28359–28365.
Kapfhamer D, Miller DE, Lambert S, Bennett V, Glover TW & Burmeister M. Chromosomal localization of the ankyrinG gene (ANK3/ Ank3) to human 10q21 and mouse 10, Genomics, 1995, 27, 189–191.[Medline]
Karlsson UL. Three-dimensional studies of neurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus of the rat. III. Specialized neuronal contacts in the neuropile, J Ultrastruct Res, 1967, 17, 137–157.[Medline]
Kaufman SJ, Bielser D & Foster RF. Localization of anti-clathrin antibody in the sarcomere and sensitivity of myofibril structure to chloroquine suggest a role for clathrin in myofibril assembly, Exp Cell Res, 1990, 191, 227–238.[Medline]
Kedra C, Peyrard M, Fransson I, Collins JE, Dunham I, Roe BA & Dumanski JP. Characterization of a second human clathrin heavy chain polypeptide gene (CLH-22)from chromosome 22q11, Hum Mol Genet, 1996, 5, 625–631.
Keller GA, Tokuyasu KT, Dutton AH & Singer SJ. An improved procedure for immunoelectron microscopy: ultrathin plastic embedding of immunolabeled ultrathin frozen sections, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1984, 81, 5744–5747.
Koenig JH & Ikeda K. Disappearance and reformation of synaptic vesicle membrane upon transmitter release observed under reversible blockage of membrane retrieval, J Neurosci, 1989, 9, 3844–3860.[Abstract]
Kordeli E, Lambert S & Bennett V. AnkyrinG. A new ankyrin gene with neural-specific isoforms localized at the axonal initial segment and node of Ranvier, J Biol Chem, 1995, 270, 2352–2359.
Kosaka T & Ikeda K. Possible temperature-dependent blockage of synaptic vesicle recycling induced by a single gene mutation in Drosophila, J Neurobiol, 1983, 14, 207–225.[Medline]
Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4, Nature (Lond), 1970, 227, 680–685.[Medline]
Lau HY, Caswell AH, Garcia H & Letelier L. Ouabain binding and coupling sodium, potassium and chloride transport in isolated transverse tubules from skeletal muscle, J Gen Physiol, 1979, 74, 335–349.
Lichte B, Veh RW, Meyer HE & Kilimann MW. Amphiphysin, a novel protein associated with synaptic vesicles, EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J, 1992, 11, 2521–2530.[Medline]
Lindsay EA, Rizzu P, Antonacci R, Jurecic V, Delmas-Mata J, Lee CC, Kim UJ, Scambler PJ & Baldini A. A transcription map in the CATCH22 critical region: identification, mapping, and ordering of four novel transcripts expressed in heart, Genomics, 1996, 32, 104–112.[Medline]
Lupas A. Prediction and analysis of coiled-coil structures, Methods Enzymol, 1996, 266, 513–525.[Medline]
McPherson PS, Takei K, Schmid SL & De Camilli P. p145, a major Grb2-binding protein in brain, is co-localized with dynamin in nerve terminals where it undergoes activity-dependent dephosphorylation, J Biol Chem, 1994, 269, 30132–30139.
McPherson PS, Garcia EP, Slepnev VI, David C, Zhang XM, Grabs D, Sossin WS, Bauerfeind R, Nemoto Y & De Camilli P. A presynaptic inositol-5-phosphatase, Nature (Lond), 1996, 379, 353–357.[Medline]
Mugnaini, E., and W.H. Oertel. 1985. An atlas of the distribution of GABAnergic neurons and terminals in the rat CNS as revealed by GAD immunocytochemistry. In Handbook of Chemical Neuroanatomy. Vol 4: GABA and Neuropeptides in the CNS. A. Bjorklund and T. Hokfelt, editors. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. 436–608.
Munn AL & Riezman H. Endocytosis is required for the growth of vacuolar H(+)-ATPase-defective yeast: identification of six new END genes, J Cell Biol, 1994, 127, 373–386.
Munn AL, Stevenson BJ, Geli MI & Riezman H. end5, end6, and end7: mutations that cause actin delocalization and block the internalization step of endocytosis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Mol Biol Cell, 1995, 6, 1721–1742.[Abstract]
Muñoz P, Rosemblatt M, Testar X, Palacin M, Thoidis G, Pilch PF & Zorzano A. The T-tubule is a cell-surface target for insulin-regulated recycling of membrane proteins in skeletal muscle, Biochem J, 1995a, 307, 393–400.
Muñoz P, Rosemblatt M, Testar X, Palacin M & Zorzano A. Isolation and characterization of distinct domains of sarcolemma and T-tubules from rat skeletal muscle, Biochem J, 1995b, 307, 273–280.[Medline]
Nelson WJ & Veshnock PJ. Ankyrin binding to (Na+ + K+)ATPase and implications for the organization of membrane domains in polarized cells, Nature (Lond), 1987, 328, 533–536.[Medline]
Palay SL, Sotelo C, Peters A & Orkand PM. The axon hillock and the initial segment, J Cell Biol, 1968, 38, 193–201.
Peters, A., S. Palay, and H. Webster. 1991. The axon. In The Fine Structure of the Nervous System. A. Peters, S.L. Palay, and H. Webster, editors. Oxford University Press, New York. 101–137.
Robinson LJ, Pang S, Harris DS, Heuser J & James DE. Translocation of the glucose transporter (GLUT4) to the cell surface in permeabilized 3T3-L1 adipocytes: effects of ATP, insulin, and GTP gamma S and localization of GLUT4 to clathrin lattices, J Cell Biol, 1996, 117, 1181–1196.[Medline]
Rubinfeld B, Souza B, Albert I, Muller O, Chamberlain SH, Masiarz FR, Munemitsu S & Polakis P. Association of the APC gene product with β-catenin, Science (Wash DC), 1993, 262, 1731–1734.
Sakamuro D, Elliott KJ, Wechsler-Reya R & Prendergast GC. BIN1 is a novel MYC-interacting protein with features of a tumour suppressor, Nat Gen, 1996, 14, 69–76.[Medline]
Shiga T & Oppenheim MW. Immunolocalization studies of putative guidance molecules used by axons and growth cones of intersegemental interneurons in the chick embryo spinal cord, J Comp Neurol, 1991, 310, 234–252.[Medline]
Shpetner HS & Vallee RB. Identification of dynamin, a novel mechanochemical enzyme that mediates interactions between microtubules, Cell, 1989, 59, 421–432.[Medline]
Shupliakov O, Low P, Grabs D, Gad H, Chen H, David C, Takei K, De Camilli P & Brodin L. Synaptic vesicle endocytosis impaired by disruption of dynamin-SH3 domain interactions, Science (Wash DC), 1997, 276, 259–263.
Sirotkin H, Morrow B, DasGupta R, Goldberg R, Patanjali SR, Shi G, Cannizzaro L, Shprintzen R, Weissman S & Kucherlapati R. Isolation of a new clathrin heavy chain gene with muscle-specific expression from the region commonly deleted in the velo-cardio-facial syndrome, Human Mol Genet, 1996, 5, 617–624.
Sivadon P, Bauer F, Aigle M & Crouzet M. Actin cytoskeleton and budding pattern are altered in the yeast rvs161 mutant: The Rvs161 protein shares common domains with the brain protein amphiphysin, Mol Gen Genet, 1995, 246, 485–495.[Medline]
Slot JW, Geuze HJ, Gigengack S, James DE & Lienhard GE. Translocation of the glucose transporter GLUT4 in cardiac myocytes of the rat, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1991, 88, 7815–7819.
Sparks AB, Hoffman NG, McConnell SJ, Fowlkes DM & Kay BK. Cloning of ligand targets: systemic isolation of SH3 domain-containing proteins, Nat Biotechnol, 1996, 14, 741–744.[Medline]
Srinivasan Y, Elmer L, Davis J, Bennett V & Angelides K. Ankyrin and spectrin associate with voltage-dependent sodium channels in brain, Nature (Lond), 1988, 333, 177–180.[Medline]
Takei K, McPherson PS, Schmid SL & De Camilli P. Tubular membrane invaginations coated by dynamin rings are induced by GTP-
S in nerve terminals, Nature (Lond), 1995, 374, 186–190.[Medline]
Tokuyasu KT. Use of poly(vinylpyrrolidone) and poly(vinyl alcohol) for cryoultramicrotomy, Histochem J, 1989, 21, 163–171.[Medline]
Towbin H, Staehelin T & Gordon J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1979, 76, 4350–4354.
Tsukita S, Itoh M, Nagafuchi A, Yonemura S & Tsukita S. Submembranous junctional plaque proteins include potential tumor suppressor molecules, J Cell Biol, 1993, 123, 1049–1053.
Wang LH, Südhof TC & Anderson RGW. The appendage domain of
-adaptin is a high affinity binding site for dynamin, J Biol Chem, 1995, 270, 10079–10083.
Wang W, Hansen PA, Marshall BA, Holloszy JO & Mueckler M. Insulin unmasks a COOH-terminal glut4 epitope and increases glucose transport across T-tubules in skeletal muscle, J Cell Biol, 1996, 135, 415–430.
Waxman SG & Quick DC. Intra-axonal ferric ion-ferrocyanaide staining of nodes of Ranvier and initial segments in central myelinated fibers, Brain Res, 1978, 144, 1–10.[Medline]
Waxman SG & Ritchie JM. Molecular dissection of the myelinated axon, Ann Neurol, 1993, 33, 121–136.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|