|
||
© The Rockefeller University Press,
0021-9525/1997//485 $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 138, Number 3,
, 1997 485-494
Article |
Mutational Analysis of Mdm1p Function in Nuclear and Mitochondrial Inheritance
Nuclear and mitochondrial transmission to daughter buds of Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends on Mdm1p, an intermediate filament-like protein localized to numerous punctate structures distributed throughout the yeast cell cytoplasm. These structures disappear and organelle inheritance is disrupted when mdm1 mutant cells are incubated at the restrictive temperature. To characterize further the function of Mdm1p, new mutant mdm1 alleles that confer temperature-sensitive growth and defects in organelle inheritance but produce stable Mdm1p structures were isolated. Microscopic analysis of the new mdm1 mutants revealed three phenotypic classes: Class I mutants showed defects in both mitochondrial and nuclear transmission; Class II alleles displayed defective mitochondrial inheritance but had no effect on nuclear movement; and Class III mutants showed aberrant nuclear inheritance but normal mitochondrial distribution. Class I and II mutants also exhibited altered mitochondrial morphology, possessing primarily small, round mitochondria instead of the extended tubular structures found in wild-type cells. Mutant mdm1 alleles affecting nuclear transmission were of two types: Class Ia and IIIa mutants were deficient for nuclear movement into daughter buds, while Class Ib and IIIb mutants displayed a complete transfer of all nuclear DNA into buds. The mutations defining all three allelic classes mapped to two distinct domains within the Mdm1p protein. Genetic crosses of yeast strains containing different mdm1 alleles revealed complex genetic interactions including intragenic suppression, synthetic phenotypes, and intragenic complementation. These results support a model of Mdm1p function in which a network comprised of multimeric assemblies of the protein mediates two distinct cellular processes.
Abbreviations used in this paper: FOA, 5-fluoro-orotic acid; SPB, spindle pole body.
CYTOPLASMIC organelles are propagated by growth and division of preexisting organelles (Palade, 1983; Yaffe, 1991; Warren and Wickner, 1996), so an essential feature of cell proliferation is the inheritance of organelles by daughter cells. Organelle inheritance is thought to depend on functions of the cytoskeleton. Such a role for cytoskeletal components has been suggested by microscopic studies that revealed colocalization of organelles with microtubules (Heggeness et al., 1978; Ball and Singer, 1982; Couchman and Rees, 1982), intermediate filaments (David-Ferreira and David-Ferreira, 1980; Mose-Larsen et al., 1982; Chen, 1988), or actin microfilaments (Wang and Goldman, 1978; Kachar and Reese, 1988) in various types of cells. In addition, studies in vitro have indicated possible functions of microtubule-based motor proteins (Vale, 1987) or unconventional myosins (Adams and Pollard, 1986; Allan, 1995) in facilitating organelle movement. However, many details of the activity and roles of particular cytoskeletal components in mediating organelle movement and distribution in living cells remain obscure.
Nuclear and mitochondrial inheritance in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends on Mdm1p, an intermediate filament-like protein that defines a series of punctate structures distributed throughout the yeast cytoplasm (McConnell and Yaffe, 1992, 1993). The punctate Mdm1p structures disappear at 37°C in cells harboring the temperature-sensitive mdm1-1 mutation (McConnell and Yaffe, 1992), and this disappearance coincides with a failure to transmit mitochondria from the mother portion of the cell into the growing bud. Additionally, the mdm1-1 lesion causes a disorientation of the mitotic spindle such that nuclear division occurs entirely within the mother portion of the cell (McConnell et al., 1990). These defects indicate that the Mdm1p network has a central function in facilitating organelle inheritance; however, the mechanism of Mdm1p function is unknown (Berger and Yaffe, 1996).
To explore Mdm1p function further, we have generated new mdm1 mutant alleles that cause defects in organelle inheritance but yield stable Mdm1p punctate structures even during incubation of cells at the nonpermissive temperature. These novel alleles have facilitated a genetic dissection of Mdm1p functions in nuclear and mitochondrial inheritance.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
spores from crosses of strain MYY291 with strains MYY700 through MYY721. Yeast culture media were prepared, and standard genetic manipulations were carried out as previously described (Rose et al., 1990). Plasmid DNA was prepared in Escherichia coli strain DH5
.
|
Mutagenized, plasmid-borne copies of MDM1 that conferred temperature-sensitive growth on cells that harbored no other copy of MDM1 were identified by a "plasmid shuffling" protocol similar to that described by Sikorski and Boeke (1991). Briefly, MYY404-1b cells were transformed with the pool of mutagenized pMDM1 DNA. Loss of the plasmid YCp50-MDM1 containing the URA3 gene and the wild-type copy of MDM1 was selected by culturing on medium containing 5-fluoro-orotic acid (FOA).1 Cells resistant to FOA were tested for growth at 37°C, and 75 independently derived, temperature-sensitive isolates were identified. Plasmids encoding various MDM1 alleles were recovered and amplified in bacterial cells.
New mutant versions of MDM1 were integrated at the chromosomal MDM1 locus of haploid cells by a two-step gene replacement strategy. DNA sequences encoding mdm1 alleles were excised from plasmid pMDM1 by digestion with SphI and NheI and subcloning into the SphI and NheI sites in the yeast integrating vector YIp5 (Struhl et al., 1979). The YIp5 constructs were linearized at the unique BglII site in the MDM1 gene; linearized plasmids were transformed into MYY290; and Ura+ transformants were isolated. Correct integration of YIp5 at the MDM1 locus was confirmed by PCR analysis and by Southern blotting.
Excision of YIp5 and wild-type MDM1 sequences was selected by plating cells on medium containing FOA. The resulting Ura– isolates were tested for growth on YPD medium at 37°C, and temperature-sensitive strains were identified as candidate mutants. Temperature-sensitive growth of the resulting strains was shown to be caused by mutations in MDM1 by the following analyses. Recessive mutants were complemented by transformation with unmutagenized MDM1 (pMDM1). Dominant mutants were mated to MYY403 (mdm1-1); the resulting diploids were sporulated; and all meiotic progeny were shown to be temperature sensitive for growth. Further, a 2:2 ratio of segregation of temperature sensitivity was observed in meiotic progeny derived from a cross of mdm1 mutants to the wild-type strain MYY291. The presence of a single copy of MDM1 (as well as the absence of YIp5 sequences) was verified by PCR and Southern blot analyses of genomic DNA isolated from each mutant.
New mutant alleles of MDM1 were characterized by DNA sequence analysis as follows. Genomic DNA was isolated from mutant cells harboring each allele. Asymmetric PCR (McCabe, 1990) was performed using different ratios of the primers 5'-CTCAGCTCTTTGGTTCAG-3' and 5'-GGCTGAAGAAGTGTACC-3' flanking the MDM1 ORF to create predominantly single-stranded products corresponding to either the coding or noncoding strand of MDM1. Nucleotide sequences of the PCR products were determined by dideoxy sequencing. All mutations were verified by sequencing both coding and noncoding strands derived from independent PCR reactions.
Phenotypic Analysis
Fluorescence and immunofluorescence microscopy to visualize mitochondria, microtubules, nuclei, and Mdm1p structures was performed as previously described (McConnell et al., 1990; McConnell and Yaffe, 1992). To visualize bud scars in conjunction with indirect immunofluorescence, cells were incubated in a solution of 10 µg/ml Calcofluor (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) for 10 min before the final wash step. In some experiments, cell populations were synchronized in the cell cycle by treatment with the yeast mating pheromone
-factor as previously described (McConnell et al., 1990). Electron microscopy was performed as described previously (Sogo and Yaffe, 1994).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The dominant or recessive character of the new mdm1 alleles was determined by examining the growth of heterozygous (MDM1/mdm1) diploids obtained by crossing the mutant strains to the wild-type parent of opposite mating type. Six of the heterozygous diploid strains failed to grow at 37°C and therefore harbored dominant mutations, while the remaining four diploid strains grew at 37°C and therefore contained recessive alleles (Table II). The growth defects conferred by the recessive haploid alleles could be complemented by transformation of the strains with a centromere-based vector containing the wild-type MDM1 gene.
|
|
|
A distinct, novel nuclear phenotype was displayed by several other alleles (Class Ib and Class IIIb). In these strains, a significant fraction of the cells incubated at the nonpermissive temperature exhibited all of the nuclear DNA localized to the bud (Fig. 3, A and B). Double-label experiments in which cells were stained with both DAPI (to reveal DNA) and Calcofluor (to label bud scars on the mother portion of the cells) confirmed that daughter buds were, in fact, receiving all of the nuclear DNA in these cells (Fig. 3 C). Visualization of microtubules in Class Ib and Class IIIb cells by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that many of the nuclei in the buds possessed unelongated mitotic spindles (Fig. 3 C), indicating aberrant positioning of the premitotic spindle apparatus.
|
|
To examine in greater detail the interactions between different mdm1 mutant alleles, all possible diploid combinations of the 10 new alleles were generated, and phenotypes of the resulting diploids were analyzed. Cells were examined for growth at 37°C and by fluorescence microscopy for mitochondrial and nuclear distribution. The consequent mutant phenotypes revealed by this analysis indicated a complex pattern of interactions (Fig. 5 A). First, certain combinations of dominant alleles yielded an apparently additive (and expected) phenotype. For example, the combination of either dominant Class II mutation with the dominant Class IIIb mutation, mdm1-227, produced diploids displaying a Class Ib phenotype. Second, some combinations of alleles yielded unexpected synthetic phenotypes. For example, the diploid obtained by crossing the recessive Class Ia mutant, mdm1-199, with the dominant Class II mutant, mdm1-202, displayed a Class Ib phenotype. Third, certain crosses led to intragenic suppression in which a phenotype caused by a dominant mutation was not observed in the diploid. An example of such intragenic suppression was the cross of the dominant Class II mutant, mdm1-202, with the dominant Class IIIa mutant, mdm1-200, resulting in a Class IIIb diploid that displayed no defect in mitochondrial distribution (suppression of the mitochondrial defect). A final type of interaction was intragenic complementation, in which the combination of two different alleles eliminated mutant phenotypes observed in one or both of the parental strains. An example of such complementation emerged from the mating of recessive Class IIIa mutant, mdm1-217, with recessive Class IIIb mutant, mdm1-228, to yield a diploid strain with wild-type growth and normal organelle distribution (Fig. 5 B).
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Class I and Class III mdm1 mutations cause aberrant positioning of the mitotic spindle leading to defective nuclear transmission. Different alleles conferring this phenotype display two strikingly different consequences: type "a" alleles (similar to the original mdm1-1 allele) show nuclear DNA entirely confined to the mother portion of the cell; while type "b" alleles show the complete transfer of all nuclear DNA into daughter buds. In a fraction of cells of both types, nuclear division occurs to yield two nuclei confined to either the mother or bud, respectively. Similar nuclear phenotypes have been observed for several other mutations that affect the positioning of the mitotic spindle. Type "a" phenotypes have been reported for cells with specific mutations in β-tubulin (tub2-401; Sullivan and Huffaker, 1992) and actin (act1-4; Palmer et al., 1992), as well as in dynein (dhc1/dyn1 [Eshel et al., 1993; Li et al., 1993; Yeh et al., 1995] and jnm1 [McMillan and Tatchell, 1994]), Act3p/Act5p (Clark and Meyer, 1994; Muhua et al., 1994), and Num1p (Kormanec et al., 1991; Farkasovsky and Kuntzel, 1995). A type "b" phenotype has been described for cells with the esp1 mutation (McGrew et al., 1992). All of these mutations affect proteins that are either components of the mitotic spindle or appear to interact with either spindle poles or astral microtubules. Mdm1p may interact with one or more of these components, and evidence for such interaction may emerge from further genetic analysis of particular Class III alleles.
The intragenic interactions observed among various mdm1 alleles support a model of Mdm1p assembly into multimeric structures and suggest that the nature or composition of these multimeric assemblies influences the activity of the Mdm1p network. Intragenic complementation of some recessive organelle inheritance defects suggests that functions defective in one allele can sometimes be supplied by a second allele in trans. In addition, complex genetic phenomena involving various allelic pairs, such as intragenic suppression and synthetic phenotypes, imply complex physical interactions between Mdm1p subunits, such that a domain of one molecule may influence the activity of a nearby region of a partner subunit in a multimeric complex. This model of Mdm1p as a multimeric complex is consistent with biochemical data indicating the aggregation of Mdm1p in cellular extracts (McConnell and Yaffe, 1992) and the assembly of purified Mdm1p into intermediate filament-like structures in vitro (McConnell and Yaffe, 1993).
One model for Mdm1p function is that this protein forms a matrix or scaffold-like network in the cytoplasm that is used to position and orient cellular structures. In particular, the spindle pole bodies (SPBs) and mitochondria could be tethered to this scaffolding at particular times during the cell cycle. Changes in mitochondrial distribution or spindle position might involve selective binding and release along the Mdm1p network. A mutation that affects organelle distribution might act either by weakening binding or by preventing appropriate release. For example, if positioning of the mitotic spindle normally involves binding of the maternal SPB to Mdm1p structures and release of the daughter SPB to be carried into the bud, different effects of mdm1 mutations on nuclear position could be explained either by failure to release the daughter SPB (type "a" alleles) or failure to bind the maternal SPB (type "b" alleles). Similarly, mitochondrial distribution and morphology might reflect the binding of the mitochondrial outer membrane or outer membrane-associated proteins to Mdm1p structures. Either loss of such binding or an unregulated or strengthened interaction with Mdm1p could produce the changes in mitochondrial morphology and distribution observed in Class I and Class II mdm1 alleles. The isolation and analysis of allele-specific suppressors, particularly of Class II and Class III alleles, should lead to the identification of proteins that interact with Mdm1p to mediate its functions in nuclear and mitochondrial inheritance.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported by grant GM44614 from the National Institutes of Health and grant MCB-9305338 from the National Science Foundation.
Submitted: 7 May 1997
Revised: 13 June 1997
Please address all correspondence to Dr. Michael P. Yaffe, Department of Biology, 0347, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093-0347. Tel.: (619) 534-4769; Fax: (619) 534-4403; E-mail: myaffe{at}ucsd.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Adams RJ & Pollard TD. Propulsion of organelles isolated from Acanthamoeba along actin filaments by myosin-I, Nature (Lond), 1986, 322, 754–756.[Medline]
Allan V. Membrane traffic motors, FEBS (Fed Eur Biochem Soc) Lett, 1995, 369, 101–106.
Ball EH & Singer SJ. Mitochondria are associated with microtubules and not with intermediate filaments in cultured fibroblasts, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1982, 79, 123–126.
Berger KH & Yaffe MP. Mitochondrial distribution and inheritance, Experientia (Basel), 1996, 52, 1111–1116.
Chen LB. Mitochondrial membrane potential in living cells, Annu Rev Cell Biol, 1988, 4, 155–181.
Clark SW & Meyer DI. ACT3: a putative centractin homologue in S. cerevisiaeis required for proper orientation of the mitotic spindle, J Cell Biol, 1994, 127, 129–138.
Couchman JR & Rees DA. Organelle-cytoskeleton relationships in fibroblasts: mitochondria, Golgi apparatus, and endoplasmic reticulum in phases of movement and growth, Eur J Cell Biol, 1982, 27, 47–54.[Medline]
David-Ferreira KL & David-Ferreira JF. Association between intermediate-sized filaments and mitochondria in rat Leidyg cells, Cell Biol Int Rep, 1980, 4, 655–662.[Medline]
Eshel D, Urrestarazu S, Vissers S, Jauniax J-C, Van Vliet-Reedijk JC, Planta RJ & Gibbons IR. Cytoplasmic dynein is required for normal nuclear segregation in yeast, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1993, 90, 11172–11176.
Farkasovsky M & Kuntzel H. Yeast Num1p associates with the mother cell cortex during S/G2phase and affects microtubular function, J Cell Biol, 1995, 131, 1003–1014.
Heggeness MH, Simon M & Singer SJ. Association of mitochondria with microtubules in cultured cells, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1978, 75, 3863–3866.
Kachar B & Reese TS. The mechanism of cytoplasmic streaming in Characean algal cells: sliding of endoplasmic reticulum along actin filaments, J Cell Biol, 1988, 106, 1545–1552.
Kormanec J, Schaaff-Gerstenschlager I, Zimmermann FK, Perecko D & Kuntzel H. Nuclear migration in Saccharomyces cerevisiaeis controlled by the highly repetitive 313 kDa NUM1 protein, Mol Gen Genet, 1991, 230, 277–287.[Medline]
Li Y-Y, Yeh E, Hays T & Bloom K. Disruption of mitotic spindle orientation in a yeast dynein mutant, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1993, 90, 10096–10100.
McCabe, P.C. 1990. Production of single-stranded DNA by asymmetric PCR. In PCR Protocols. M.A. Innis, D.H. Gelfand, J.J. Sninsky, and T.J. White, editors. Academic Press, San Diego. 76–83.
McConnell SJ & Yaffe MP. Nuclear and mitochondrial inheritance in yeast depends on novel cytoplasmic structures defined by the MDM1 protein, J Cell Biol, 1992, 118, 385–395.
McConnell SJ & Yaffe MP. Intermediate filament formation by a yeast protein essential for organelle inheritance, Science (Wash DC), 1993, 260, 687–689.
McConnell SJ, Stewart LC, Talin A & Yaffe MP. Temperature-sensitive yeast mutants defective in mitochondrial inheritance, J Cell Biol, 1990, 111, 967–976.
McGrew JT, Goetsch L, Byers B & Baum P. Requirement for ESP1 in the nuclear division of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , Mol Biol Cell, 1992, 3, 1443–1454.[Abstract]
McMillan JN & Tatchell K. The JNM1 gene in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiaeis required for nuclear migration and spindle orientation during the mitotic cell cycle, J Cell Biol, 1994, 125, 143–158.
Mose-Larsen P, Bravo R, Fey SJ, Small JV & Celis JE. Putative association of mitochondria with a subpopulation of intermediate-sized filaments in cultured human skin fibroblasts, Cell, 1982, 31, 681–692.[Medline]
Muhua L, Karpova TS & Cooper JA. A yeast actin-related protein homologous to that in vertebrate dynactin complex is important for spindle orientation and nuclear migration, Cell, 1994, 78, 669–679.[Medline]
Palade G. Membrane biogenesis: an overview, Methods Enzymol, 1983, 96, 29–40.
Palmer RE, Sullivan DS, Huffaker T & Koshland D. Role of astral microtubules and actin in spindle orientation and migration in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , J Cell Biol, 1992, 119, 583–593.
Rose, M.D., F. Winston, and P. Hieter. 1990. Methods in Yeast Genetics: A Laboratory Course Manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
Sikorski RS & Hieter P. A system of shuttle vectors and yeast host strains designed for efficient manipulation of DNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , Genetics, 1989, 122, 19–27.
Sikorski RS & Boeke JD. In Vitromutagenesis and plasmid shuffling: from cloned gene to mutant yeast, Methods Enzymol, 1991, 194, 302–318.[Medline]
Smith BJ & Yaffe MP. A mutation in the yeast heat-shock factor gene causes temperature-sensitive defects in both mitochondrial protein import and the cell cycle, Mol Cell Biol, 1991, 11, 2647–2655.
Sogo LF & Yaffe MP. Regulation of mitochondrial morphology and inheritance by Mdm10p, a protein of the mitochondrial outer membrane, J Cell Biol, 1994, 126, 1361–1373.
Struhl K, Stinchcomb DT, Scherer S & Davis RW. High frequency transformation of yeast: autonomous replication of hybrid DNA molecules, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1979, 76, 1035–1039.
Sullivan DS & Huffaker TC. Astral microtubules are not required for anaphase B in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , J Cell Biol, 1992, 119, 379–388.
Vale RD. Intracellular transport using microtubule-based motors, Annu Rev Cell Biol, 1987, 3, 347–378.
Wang E & Goldman RD. Functions of cytoplasmic fibers in intracellular movements in BHK-21 cells, J Cell Biol, 1978, 79, 708–726.
Warren G & Wickner W. Organelle inheritance, Cell, 1996, 84, 395–400.[Medline]
Yaffe MP. Organelle inheritance in the yeast cell cycle, Trends Cell Biol, 1991, 1, 160–164.[Medline]
Yeh E, Skibbens RV, Cheng JW, Salmon ED & Bloom K. Spindle dynamics and cell cycle regulation of dynein in the budding yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , J Cell Biol, 1995, 130, 687–700.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|