Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF, 521K) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Citation Map Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new content in the JCB Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Muller, L. Articles by Lindberg, I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Muller, L. Articles by Lindberg, I. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/1997//625 $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 139, Number 3, , 1997 625-638

Mechanism of the Facilitation of PC2 Maturation by 7B2: Involvement in ProPC2 Transport and Activation but Not Folding

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Louisiana State University Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112

Among the members of the prohormone convertase (PC) family, PC2 has a unique maturation pattern: it is retained in the ER for a comparatively long time and its propeptide is cleaved in the TGN/ secretory granules rather than in the ER. It is also unique by its association with the neuroendocrine protein 7B2. This interaction results in the facilitation of proPC2 maturation and in the production of activatable proPC2 from CHO cells. In the present study, we have investigated the mechanism of this interaction.

ProPC2 binds 7B2 in the ER, but exits this compartment much more slowly than 7B2. We found that proPC2 was also slow to acquire the capacity to bind 7B2, whereas 7B2 could bind proPC2 rapidly after synthesis. This indicated that proPC2 folding was the limiting step in the formation of the complex. Indeed, sensitivity of native proPC2 to N-glycanase F digestion and inhibition of proPC2 folding supported the notion that 7B2 is not involved in the early steps of proPC2 folding, and that proPC2 must fold before binding 7B2. Under experimental conditions that prevent propeptide cleavage, 7B2 expression increased proPC2 transport to the Golgi. This increase exhibited the same kinetics as the facilitation of the removal of the propeptide. Finally, proPC2 activation could be reconstituted in Golgi- enriched subcellular fractions. In vitro, 7B2 was required for proPC2 activation at an acidic pH.

Taken together, our results demonstrate that rather than promoting proPC2 folding, 7B2 acts as a helper protein involved in proPC2 transport and is required in the proPC2 activation process. We propose, therefore, that 7B2 stabilizes proPC2 in a conformation already competent for these two events.

Abbreviations used in this paper: AMC, aminomethylcoumarin; CT peptide, COOH-terminal domain (residues 155–185) of 7B2; PC, prohormone convertase.

THE major posttranslational modifications that result in the production of active peptides are endoproteolytic cleavage of the precursor, followed by exoproteolytic cleavage, and NH₂-terminal acetylation and/or COOH-terminal amidation. The enzymes responsible for endoproteolytic cleavage events have recently been cloned (for review see Seidah and Chretien, 1994; Rouille et al., 1995). These prohormone convertases (PC)¹ are the mammalian homologues of the serine protease subtilisin. Their expression pattern is either ubiquitous, as for furin (Hatsuzawa et al., 1990) and PACE4 (Kiefer et al., 1991), or tissue specific, as for PC1 and PC2, which are restricted to neuroendocrine cells (Seidah et al., 1990, 1991; Smeekens et al., 1991), or PC4, which is restricted to the testis (Nakayama et al., 1992; Seidah et al., 1992). The PCs are synthesized as proenzymes which undergo activation by cleavage of the proregion. The role of this propeptide as an intramolecular chaperone has been established in the case of subtilisin (Zhu et al., 1989), and the same function has been proposed for the propeptides of other enzymes of this family, including the PCs (for review see Siezen et al., 1995). The removal of the proregion of PC1 (Benjannet et al., 1993; Zhou and Lindberg, 1993; Lindberg, 1994; Zhou and Mains, 1994), furin (Molloy et al., 1994; Vey et al., 1994) or PC5 (DeBie et al., 1996), occurs in the ER shortly after synthesis. PC2, however, displays a very different posttranslational processing pattern: it is retained in the ER much longer than the other PCs studied so far, and it is converted to mature PC2 in the TGN or in the secretory granules, and not in the ER (Guest et al., 1992; Benjannet et al., 1993; Shen et al., 1993; Zhou and Mains, 1994). This unique maturation pathway is correlated with the specific association of proPC2 with the neuroendocrine protein 7B2 first shown by Braks and Martens (1994).

7B2 is a secretory protein of 185 amino acids migrating at 27 kD on SDS-PAGE (Martens et al., 1989; Hsi et al., 1982). The 27-kD form is a precursor protein that is cleaved in the TGN (Ayoubi et al., 1990; Paquet et al., 1991, 1994) into two domains. The COOH-terminal domain (residues 155–185) of 7B2 (CT peptide) constitutes a specific inhibitor of PC2 activity (Martens et al., 1994; Lindberg et al., 1995). The region of the CT peptide responsible for this effect has been identified (Van Horssen et al., 1995), and a mechanism for the termination of the inhibition has been proposed (Zhu et al., 1996a). The 21-kD NH₂-terminal domain binds to PC2 (Zhu and Lindberg, 1995). We have identified a proline-rich segment of this NH₂-terminal domain that is responsible for 7B2 binding to proPC2 (Zhu et al., 1996b). We have already shown that binding of 7B2 to PC2 results in the facilitation of proPC2 maturation and that the NH₂-terminal domain alone can mediate this effect (Zhu and Lindberg, 1995). We have also demonstrated that whereas proPC2 secreted from CHO cells could not be activated, coexpression of 7B2 resulted in the secretion of activatable proPC2 (Zhu and Lindberg, 1995). The mechanism of the facilitation of proPC2 maturation by 7B2, however, remains unknown. Based on coimmunoprecipitation experiments and on the homology of 7B2 with proteins of the chaperone 60 family, Braks and Martens (1994) have proposed that 7B2 is a molecular chaperone specific for PC2. These authors considered a chaperone as a protein that binds to and stabilizes another protein, which results in the facilitation of its correct fate in vivo, according to Hendrick and Hartl (1993). This definition, however, does not refer to a particular function but envelops such different functions as folding, oligomeric assembly, transport to a subcellular compartment, or switching between active/inactive conformations (for review see Hendrick and Hartl, 1993). In the present paper, we refer to molecular chaperones according to a more specific definition; i.e., as proteins that interact either transiently with folding intermediates, which results in the facilitation of folding, or more stably with unfolded or aggregated forms of other proteins (for review see Hurtley and Helenius, 1989; Rothman, 1989; Gething and Sambrook, 1992; Hartl, 1996).

7B2 binding to proPC2 can occur in the presence of brefeldin A, suggesting that the association of the two proteins is initiated in a preGolgi compartment (Benjannet et al., 1995; Braks et al., 1996). The demonstration of coimmunoprecipitation of sulfated 7B2 and proPC2 indicate that the two proteins are still associated in the TGN, before cleavage of 7B2 and activation of proPC2 (Benjannet et al., 1995). Thus, 7B2 and proPC2 are transported together from the ER to the TGN. The facilitation of proPC2 conversion by 7B2 in AtT-20 cells could, therefore, result from the action of 7B2 at different steps of the secretory pathway: (a) proPC2 folding in the ER, since folding is a limiting step in protein transport to the Golgi (for review see Lodish, 1988); (b) proPC2 transport from the ER to the Golgi, as both proteins are transported together within the secretory pathway; and (c) proPC2 conversion into mature PC2 in the TGN or in the secretory granules, as we have shown that 7B2 coexpression is required to obtain activatable proPC2 from CHO cell secretion medium (Zhu and Lindberg, 1995). In the present work, we have studied the interaction of proPC2 with 7B2 in these compartments of the secretory pathway by radiolabeling experiments in AtT-20 cells overexpressing either PC2 alone or PC2 and 7B2. We have also performed subcellular fractionation of CHO cells that overexpress proPC2 in order to reconstitute the activation of proPC2 in the presence of recombinant 7B2 in vitro. Our data establish that in AtT-20 cells, 7B2 is not involved in proPC2 folding but increases proPC2 transport to the Golgi. Additionally, using our in vitro system, we demonstrate that 7B2 is required for the productive cleavage of the propeptide, i.e., for the generation of active mature PC2.

	Materials and Methods

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
Antibodies
The antiserum against PC2 (LSU18) was directed against a COOH-terminal peptide of mature PC2. The antiserum against 7B2 (LSU13) was raised against residues 23–39 of 7B2. We have described the specificity of these two antisera elsewhere (Zhu and Lindberg, 1995). The monoclonal antibody MON102 was kindly provided by G. Martens (University of Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands). It was directed against 7B2 amino acids 128–135 (Van Duijnhoven et al., 1991). The antiserum directed against BiP/GRP78 was obtained from Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc. (Santa Cruz, CA). It was directed against amino acids 24–43 of human BiP. Antiserum against calnexin was kindly provided by P. Arvan (Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY), and was directed against the 19-COOH-terminal residues of murine calnexin (Kim et al., 1996).

Cell Culture, Site-directed Mutagenesis, and Transfection
All AtT-20 cells were cultured at 37°C in 5% CO₂. They were maintained in DME containing 10% Nuserum (Becton Dickinson, Mountain View, CA), 2.5% fetal bovine serum (Irvine Scientific, Santa Ana, CA) and the appropriate selection agents, 200 µg/ml G418 (Life Technologies Inc., Gaithersburg, MD) and/or 100 µg/ml hygromycin (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO). Cells were transfected using Lipofectin (Life Technologies) as described (Zhu and Lindberg, 1995). The parental AtT-20 cells and those stably expressing PC2 were kindly provided by R. Mains (Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD) (Zhou and Mains, 1994). The transfection of AtT-20/PC2 cells with a plasmid encoding rat 27-kD 7B2 has already been described (Zhu and Lindberg, 1995). The experiments in which we compared the kinetics of proPC2 maturation were performed with three different clones expressing 7B2 and PC2, using the parental cells as well as a transfected clone that did not overexpress 7B2 as controls. To obtain cell lines that expressed the 27-kD 7B2 and mutated proPC2, AtT-20 cells were first transfected with a pCEP4 plasmid (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) encoding rat 27-kD 7B2. A high-expressing clone was selected and supertransfected with a plasmid pRC/CMV (Invitrogen) encoding PC2 mutated at the three glycosylation sites. The Asn of each glycosylation site was replaced by a Gln. This mutation was obtained by polymerase chain reaction-mediated methods already described (Zhu and Lindberg, 1995). The primers used were: 5'-GGGCCAAGCTTCACTCCCAAAGAAGGATGG-3', 5'-GCCATACAAGTCTGTGGTAG-3', 5'-CTACCACAGACTTGTATGGCCAATGTACTC- TGAGACACTCTGG-3', 5'-CGCGCTCTAGAGTGAAGGCGGAAGC-GTGGCC-3', 5'-AGGTCTCCTCTCCTGGTCGCTTGGACTGTGATG-ACAGCTTGGA-3', 5'-GACCAGGAGAGGAGACCTGAACATCCA-AATGACCTCCCCAATGGGC-3'. The study of the effect of this mutation was performed on two different clones.

The CHO cells stably expressing proPC2 that we used for the subcellular fractionation studies have already been described (Shen et al., 1993). This cell line was amplified for the expression of proPC2 using the dihydrofolate reductase method, but did not produce active enzyme.

Metabolic Labeling, Protein Extraction, and Immunoprecipitation
5 x 10⁵ AtT-20 cells were labeled 40–48 h after seeding in six-well plates. They were labeled with 500 µCi/ml of [³⁵S]methionine and cysteine (Pro-mix; Amersham Corp., Arlington Heights, IL) for 10 min. After the pulse, they were extracted or chased in DME containing 2% fetal bovine serum. The sulfate-labeling experiments were performed in 12-well plates. Cells were labeled with 2 mCi/ml [³⁵S]sulfate (ICN Biomedicals, Inc., Irvine, CA) for 15 min and chased as previously described. In some experiments, cells were treated with 5 mM DTT during the pulse and the chase. They were then washed twice with PBS before a further chase without DTT. To prevent the acidification of the pH in the TGN and the secretory granules, cells were incubated with 1 µM bafilomycin A1 (Kamiya Biomedical Co., Seattle, WA) during the chase.

Before extraction, cells were treated with 1 ml of 0.2 M iodoacetamide in PBS for 10 min on ice. All of the following steps of extraction and immunoprecipitation were performed at 4°C. For immunoprecipitation conducted under native conditions, proteins were extracted with a buffer containing 1% Triton X-100 in 25 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM iodoacetamide, 5 mM EDTA and 0.5 mM p-chloromercuriphenylsulfonic acid (Sigma Chemical Co.) and 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (Boehringer Mannheim Corp., Indianapolis, IN). The extracts were centrifuged for 10 min at 15,000 g. Supernatants were diluted to 0.5% Triton X-100 and stored at –20°C before immunoprecipitation. For immunoprecipitation under denaturing conditions, proteins were extracted as previously described (Zhu and Lindberg, 1995).

Extracts were first incubated for 1 h in the presence of protein A coupled to Sepharose CL-4B (Pharmacia Biotech. Inc., Piscataway, NJ). The supernatants were then incubated for 4 h or overnight in the presence of antisera directed against either PC2 or 7B2. To immunoprecipitate BiP/ GRP78-bound PC2, BiP/GRP78 was first immunoprecipitated under native conditions for 2 h. The immune complexes were boiled in 1% SDS for 5 min before dilution in immunoprecipitation buffer and PC2 immunoprecipitation. The immune complexes were precipitated with protein A coupled to Sepharose CL-4B and washed once with immunoprecipitation buffer, once with 0.5 M NaCl in PBS, and twice with PBS. They were then boiled in Laemmli sample buffer before separation by SDS-PAGE on 8.8 or 12% acrylamide gels. Gels were either treated for fluorography with Amplify (Amersham Corp.) or directly exposed to a phosphoscreen and analyzed with a phosphorimager (Storm; Molecular Dynamics, Sunnyvale, CA) and ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics).

Glycosidase Digestions
Immunoprecipitated PC2 was boiled in 2% SDS in 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, for 5 min and diluted in the digestion buffer. Endoglycosidase H digestion was performed in 100 mM sodium acetate, pH 5.5, in the presence of 10 mU/ml endoglycosidase H (Boehringer Mannheim Corp.). N-glycanase F digestion was performed in 100 mM sodium phosphate, pH 7.4, containing 0.5% Nonidet-P40 in the presence of 4 U/ml N-glycanase F (Boehringer Mannheim Corp.). Control digestions were performed with either of these buffers without enzyme. Incubations were conducted overnight at 37°C. They were stopped by addition of Laemmli sample buffer and boiled 5 min before separation by SDS-PAGE. Digestion of PC2 with N-glycanase F under native conditions was performed directly after PC2 immunoprecipitation. The incubations were conducted in the presence of 8 U/ml enzyme at 37°C for 30–120 min, with either time period providing the same results.

Sucrose Gradient Centrifugation
We investigated PC2 aggregation in the ER by sucrose gradient centrifugation according to Simons and collaborators (1995). Briefly, AtT-20 cells were radiolabeled and proteins were extracted as described previously for native immunoprecipitation and loaded on the top of a continuous sucrose gradient (10–40%) containing 0.1% Triton X-100. The gradients were centrifuged for 7 h at 4°C in a rotor (SW50.1; Beckman Instrs., Fullerton, CA) at 45,000 rpm. PC2 was immunoprecipitated from the fractions and separated by SDS-PAGE. The radioactivity of the gels was analyzed with a phosphorimager.

Subcellular Fractionation and Marker Assays
CHO/PC2 cells were grown in four 850 cm² rollers for each membrane preparation. Rollers were washed with calcium-free PBS on ice. All of the following steps were performed at 4°C. Cells were scraped in calcium-free PBS and pelleted. They were resuspended in 0.25 M sucrose in 10 mM Tris, pH 7.4, and homogenized with a stainless steel ball-bearing homogenizer. The homogenate was centrifuged for 20 min at 7,500 g. The supernatant was pelleted at 56,000 rpm in a rotor (TL 100.4; Beckman Instrs.) for 35 min. Pellets were resuspended in 1.15 M sucrose and loaded on the bottom of a discontinuous sucrose gradient composed of 1.5 ml of 0.86 M sucrose and 1.5 ml of 0.25 M sucrose. The gradient was centrifuged at 46,000 rpm in a rotor (TL 100.4; Beckman Instrs.) for 140 min. Five fractions were collected.

Galactosyl transferase activity was used as a marker for the Golgi membranes. The activity was measured according to Chaney et al. (1989), using [³H]UDP-galactose as a substrate (Amersham Corp.). The molecular chaperone BiP/GRP78 was used as a marker for the ER. The content of each fraction was assayed by immunoblotting.

Immunoblotting
Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE on 8.8% gels. They were then transferred to nitrocellulose membranes that were incubated with antisera as described previously (Shen et al., 1993). Alkaline phosphatase activity was detected using either nitroblue tetrazolium and 5-bromo-4chloro-3indolyl phosphate as substrate or the Vistra Western blot substrate (Amersham Corp.). Membranes were analyzed with a phosphorimager (Storm; Molecular Dynamics) and quantitation of the results was performed with ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics).

Enzyme Assays
PC2 activity was measured using 200 µM Pyr-Glu-Arg-Thr-Lys-Arg-aminomethylcoumarin (AMC) as a substrate as previously described (Lamango et al., 1996). The assay was performed in 100 mM sodium acetate, pH 5, containing 5 mM CaCl₂, 1% Triton X-100 in the presence of a protease inhibitor cocktail composed of 1 µM pepstatin, 0.28 mM tosylphenylalanine chloromethyl ketone (TPCK), 1 µM trans-epoxysuccinic acid (E64), and 0.14 mM tosyllysyl chloromethyl ketone (TLCK). All incubations were conducted at 37°C for time points ranging from 30 min to 4 h. In some experiments, the activity was also measured in the presence of 1 µM 7B2 CT peptide, a specific inhibitor of PC2 activity (Lindberg et al., 1995). The activity was measured in triplicate and assays were reproduced with three different subcellular fraction preparations. Fluorescence of AMC was measured with a fluorometer (Cambridge Technology, Inc., Cambridge, MA). The amount of released product was calculated by reference to the fluorescence of free AMC standard.

	Results

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
7B2 Is Secreted More Slowly Than 7B2 Due to Its Slower Transport to the TGN
Kinetic studies of the release of newly synthesized 7B2 and PC2 show that 7B2 is secreted more rapidly than PC2 when both proteins are stably coexpressed in AtT-20 cells (Zhu and Lindberg, 1995; Table I). In constitutively- secreting cells, the limiting factor in the secretion of proteins is the time required for their folding in the ER (for review see Lodish, 1988), but in neuroendocrine cells, different kinetics of secretion can also be indicative of differences in sorting at the exit from the TGN (for review see Kelly, 1985). To distinguish between these two possibilities, we studied the release of sulfated PC2 and 7B2, as sulfation is a posttranslational modification that specifically takes place in the trans-Golgi (Baeuerle and Huttner, 1987). Sulfated 7B2 and PC2 were released at the same rate into the medium (Table I). The difference between the release of newly synthesized and sulfated 7B2 and PC2 indicates, therefore, that the limiting step of proPC2 secretion is the exit from the ER. On the other hand, newly synthesized 7B2 exits from this compartment more rapidly than PC2. This is in agreement with the difference in half-life between 7B2 and proPC2, which are both cleaved in the TGN/secretory granules: the 7B2 precursor half-life is 15 min, whereas the proPC2 half-life is 100 min in AtT-20 cells that overexpress both proteins (Zhu and Lindberg, 1995). This result is also consistent with the long retention of proPC2 in the ER already described in different cell models (Guest et al., 1992; Benjannet et al., 1993; Shen et al., 1993; Zhou and Mains, 1994), and with the subcellular localization of PC2 in transfected AtT-20 cells (Mains et al., 1995; Creemers et al, 1996), and in anterior pituitary lactotrophs (Muller et al., 1997).

View larger version (53K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 1 7B2 and PC2 do not acquire the capacity to bind each other at the same rate. AtT-20 cells that express 7B2 and PC2 were labeled for 10 min and chased for the indicated time periods. 7B2 and PC2 were coimmunoprecipitated under native conditions using antisera directed against 7B2 and PC2 as indicated. 21 kD indicates the position of the 21-kD NH2-terminal domain of 7B2 and 27 kD indicates the position of the whole 7B2 precursor.

View larger version (103K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 6 Bafilomycin A1 effect on proPC2 and 7B2 maturation and binding. (a) Bafilomycin A1 prevents the removal of the proPC2 propeptide. AtT-20 cells that express proPC2 alone or proPC2 and 7B2 were labeled for 10 min and directly extracted or chased for 120 min before extraction in the presence or absence of 1 µM bafilomycin A1. PC2 was immunoprecipitated. (b) Bafilomycin A1 does not affect 7B2 cleavage and binding to proPC2. AtT-20 cells that express 7B2 and PC2 were labeled for 10 min and directly extracted or chased for 30 min before extraction. 7B2 was immunoprecipitated under native conditions. (c) Bafilomycin A1 does not inhibit transport to the Golgi. AtT-20 cells that express 7B2 and PC2 were labeled for 10 min and chased for 120 min before extraction. PC2 was immunoprecipitated, denatured, and digested under control conditions (C) or with endoglycosidase H (H) or N-glycanase F (F).

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 8 The 7B2-proPC2 complex is not accumulated in the ER but rapidly transported to the Golgi. AtT-20 cells expressing PC2 and 7B2 were labeled for 10 min and chased for the indicated times in the presence of 1 µM bafilomycin A1. PC2 and 7B2 were immunoprecipitated under native conditions, denatured, and digested with endoglycosidase H.

The experiments presented in Fig. 1 also show that 7B2 is cleaved with the same kinetics whether it is bound to proPC2 or not. Cleavage of 7B2 is a marker for 7B2 transport from the ER to the trans-Golgi, as it occurs after sulfation (Paquet et al., 1994). Therefore, proPC2-bound 7B2 is transported to the TGN at the same rate as total 7B2 (Fig. 1). We also observed the same kinetics of processing of 7B2 in AtT-20 cells expressing 7B2 in the absence of proPC2 (results not shown). Therefore, binding of proPC2 has no effect on 7B2 transport kinetics to the TGN. Taken together, these data support the idea that newly synthesized 7B2 binds only to unlabeled proPC2 synthesized before the pulse and accumulated in the ER, and that 7B2 exits this compartment sooner after synthesis than proPC2. Thus, proPC2 requires a longer time period in the ER environment before it can bind to 7B2. This suggested that proPC2 must fold before it can bind to 7B2, whereas 7B2 folding is apparently not a limiting step in the formation of the complex.

7B2 Is Not Involved in ProPC2 Folding
To investigate the chaperone activity of 7B2 on proPC2 folding, several strategies were attempted to establish a proPC2 folding assay. First we used digestion of immunoprecipitated proPC2 by N-glycanase F under native conditions to study proPC2 conformational changes (Fig. 2). The rationale of this experiment is that the conformation changes that occur during folding modify the access of the enzyme to its substrate (Feng et al., 1995). Indeed, when cells were extracted at the end of the pulse, N-glycanase F-digested proPC2 migrated as three bands. When cells were extracted after a 30-min chase, the band that migrated most rapidly was no longer present. We observed the same difference whether cells expressed PC2 alone or with 7B2 (Fig. 2). This indicated that proPC2 undergoes the same conformational changes whether 7B2 is coexpressed or not, and supported the idea that 7B2 is not involved in early proPC2 folding events.

View larger version (26K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 2 7B2 does not modify the pattern of digestion of native proPC2 by N-glycanase F. AtT-20 cells that express PC2 alone or also 7B2 were labeled for 10 min and directly extracted or chased for 30 min before extraction. ProPC2 was immunoprecipitated under native conditions and digested with N-glycanase F as described in Materials and Methods. The reaction was stopped by addition of Laemmli sample buffer and boiled for 5 min before separation of proteins by SDS-PAGE.

Fourthly, we investigated the binding of proPC2 to the molecular chaperones calnexin and BiP/GRP78. These molecular chaperones are localized in the ER where they bind to unfolded proteins and folding intermediates (Gething and Sambrook, 1992; Ou et al., 1993). If 7B2 were a chaperone involved in proPC2 folding, we might expect that its coexpression with PC2 should modify the pattern of association of proPC2 with other chaperones, as folding intermediates sequentially bind to molecular chaperones. ProPC2 binding to calnexin was very low: 5% of the total radio- labeled proPC2 could be coimmunoprecipitated by the calnexin antiserum at the end of the pulse, and it was hardly detected after a 30-min chase (Fig. 3). Coexpression of 7B2 did not modify proPC2 coimmunoprecipitation with calnexin. Binding of proPC2 to BiP was lower than to calnexin; it did not change with time (see Fig. 5 a) and was not affected by 7B2 coexpression.

View larger version (21K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 3 7B2 does not modify the association of proPC2 with calnexin. AtT-20 cells that express PC2 alone (A/P) or also 7B2 (A/P/7) were labeled for 10 min and directly extracted or chased for 30 min before extraction. Calnexin was immunoprecipitated under native conditions. The immune complexes were boiled in 1% SDS for 5 min. They were then diluted in immunoprecipitation buffer and PC2 was immunoprecipitated.

View larger version (39K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 5 Mutation of proPC2 glycosylation sites prevents 7B2 binding. AtT-20 cells that express 7B2 and either wild-type PC2 (WT) or unglycosylated PC2 (3NQ) were labeled for 10 min and chased for the indicated times. (a) Unglycosylated proPC2 stably binds to BiP. BiP/GRP78 was immunoprecipitated under native conditions at the end of the labeling period and after a 30-min chase. The immune complexes were solubilized in 1% SDS at 100°C. They were then diluted in the immunoprecipitation buffer and PC2 was immunoprecipitated. The asterisk indicates the position of unglycosylated proPC2. (b) Unglycosylated proPC2 is neither processed nor secreted. Cells were extracted at the end of the pulse and after a 120-min chase. PC2 was immunoprecipitated under native conditions from the cell extracts and from the media. The asterisk indicate the position of unglycosylated proPC2. (c) Unglycosylated proPC2 does not bind 7B2. 7B2 was immunoprecipitated under native conditions from the extracts of cells that had been chased for 30 min.

DTT treatment prevents the formation of disulfides in newly synthesized proteins (Braakman et al., 1992) but does not affect the secretory pathway (Lodish and Kong, 1993). In AtT-20 cells treated with DTT, proPC2 conversion into PC2 was inhibited (Fig. 4 a). ProPC2 was not secreted, but was degraded within the cells. On the other hand, DTT had no effect on the cleavage nor the secretion of 7B2 (Fig. 4 b). When cells were incubated 30 min in the presence of DTT, the binding of proPC2 to 7B2 was inhibited (Fig. 4 c). 7B2 binding was restored, however, 30 min after the washout of DTT from the medium (Fig. 4 c). Therefore, formation of the disulfide bridges is required before association of 7B2 with proPC2.

View larger version (24K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 4 Effect of DTT on proPC2 and 7B2 maturation and binding. AtT-20 cells that express 7B2 and PC2 were labeled for 10 min and chased for the indicated time periods. Cells treated with 5 mM DTT were in the continuous presence of the drug during the pulse and the chase. (a) DTT prevents proPC2 processing and secretion. Cells were extracted at the end of the pulse and after a 2-h chase. PC2 was immunoprecipitated from the cell extracts (Cells) and from the media (M) under denaturing conditions. (b) DTT does not affect 7B2 processing and secretion. Cells were extracted at the end of the pulse and after a 30-min chase. 7B2 was immunoprecipitated from the cell extracts and from the media under native conditions. (c) DTT reversibly prevents 7B2 binding to proPC2. Cells were first chased in the presence or absence of DTT for 30 min. Cells that had been incubated in the presence of DTT were then washed twice with PBS and further chased for 30 min in the presence or absence of DTT. 7B2 was immunoprecipitated under native conditions.

Taken together, these experiments demonstrate that prevention of the folding of proPC2 results in the loss of 7B2 binding capacity and, thus, that proPC2 must fold before it can bind 7B2. These data are in agreement with the lack of involvement of 7B2 in the early steps of proPC2 folding.

7B2 Increases the Transport Rate of ProPC2 from the ER to the Golgi
We have already shown that the half-life for the conversion of proPC2 decreases considerably in the presence of 7B2 (Zhu and Lindberg, 1995). The results presented above supported the notion that this effect is not mediated by an increase in the proPC2 folding rate. Thus, 7B2 could act by increasing either the rate of transport, or the rate of propeptide cleavage, or both. To study proPC2 transport to the Golgi apparatus, we investigated the acquisition of endoglycosidase H resistance. It should be noted that because of carbohydrate heterogeneity, PC2 never becomes completely resistant to endoglycosidase H digestion. The demonstration of the presence of an endoglycosidase H-resistant form of proPC2/PC2 requires, therefore, a control N-glycanase F digestion (Bennett et al., 1992). Even after release into the medium, only one or two of the three potential glycosylation sites have acquired endoglycosidase H resistance, whereas the others remain sensitive (Mains et al., 1995; Creemers et al., 1996). As the goal of this experiment was to differentiate between 7B2 effects on the transport of proPC2 and on its conversion into PC2, we needed to work under experimental conditions that prevent the cleavage of the PC2 propeptide. This was necessary since previous studies have shown that the conversion of proPC2 into PC2 is very closely related in time to the acquisition of endoglycosidase H-resistance: i.e., these studies could not identify any proPC2 partially resistant to endoglycosidase H nor any mature PC2 completely sensitive to endoglycosidase H (Mains et al., 1995; Creemers et al., 1996; Muller, L., and I. Lindberg, unpublished results).

ProPC2 conversion requires an acidic pH, which corresponds to the TGN and the secretory granules (Shennan et al., 1995; Lamango et al., 1996). To block proPC2 cleavage, we prevented the acidification of the pH in these intracellular compartments with bafilomycin A1 treatment. Bafilomycin A1 is a specific inhibitor of the vacuolar H⁺-ATPase responsible for the acidification of pH in the TGN and secretory granules (Bowman et al., 1988). This treatment completely inhibited the conversion of proPC2 in cells that express proPC2 alone and exhibit a low rate of conversion, as well as in cells that coexpress PC2 and 7B2 and, therefore, possess a much higher rate of processing (Fig. 6 a). This drug did not affect 7B2 cleavage (Fig. 6 b), which is in agreement with the proposed cleavage of 7B2 by furin (Paquet et al., 1994), an enzyme active at neutral pH (Bresnahan et al., 1990; Hatsuzawa et al., 1992; Molloy et al., 1992). Bafilomycin A1 had no effect on the binding of 7B2 to proPC2 (Fig. 6 b). It also did not prevent proPC2 transport from the ER to the Golgi, as demonstrated by the acquisition of endoglycosidase H resistance (Fig. 6 c). After a 2-h chase in the presence of bafilomycin A1, endoglycosidase H–digested PC2 migrated as a doublet (Fig. 6 c). The lower band comigrated with N-glycanase F-digested PC2 and, therefore, corresponded to endoglycosidase H–sensitive PC2. The upper band corresponded to PC2 partially resistant to endoglycosidase H. This result demonstrated that some of the newly synthesized PC2 had acquired complex carbohydrates in the Golgi in the presence of bafilomycin A1. This is in agreement with previous studies that have shown that bafilomycin A1 does not impede intracellular transport to the Golgi, but only between the TGN and the plasma membrane (Umata et al., 1990; Yoshimori et al., 1991).

These experimental conditions allowed us to study the effect of 7B2 on proPC2 transport to the Golgi. Cells expressing PC2 alone or PC2 and 7B2 were treated with bafilomycin A1. ProPC2 was immunoprecipitated, denatured, and digested with endoglycosidase H. Fig. 7 shows that the coexpression of 7B2 with PC2 increased proPC2 acquisition of endoglycosidase H resistance. Acquisition of endoglycosidase H resistance was very low (20% after 120 min) in cells that express PC2 alone, in agreement with the low maturation rate of proPC2 in these cells (Fig. 6 a) (Mains et al., 1995; Zhu and Lindberg, 1995). Coexpression of 7B2 increased the level of endoglycosidase H–resistant PC2 to 65% after a 120-min chase. The kinetics of acquisition of endoglycosidase H resistance paralleled those of proPC2 maturation that we have already described in these cells (Fig. 6 a; Zhu and Lindberg, 1995).

View larger version (23K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 7 7B2 increases proPC2 transport to the Golgi. AtT-20 cells expressing PC2 alone or PC2 and 7B2 were labeled for 10 min and chased for the indicated time periods in the presence of 1 µM bafilomycin A1. PC2 was immunoprecipitated, denatured, and digested with endoglycosidase H. r indicates the position of endoglycosidase H–resistant proPC2, and s the position of endoglycosidase H–sensitive proPC2.

7B2 Induces the Conversion and the Activation of ProPC2 from Golgi-enriched Subcellular Fractions
We have already shown that the coexpression of PC2 with the 21-kD NH₂-terminal domain of 7B2 is required for the production of activatable proPC2 by CHO cells (Zhu and Lindberg, 1995). To study this requirement, we reconstituted proPC2 activation by adding recombinant 7B2 to subcellular fractions from CHO cells that express proPC2 alone. This system allowed us to study in vitro the effect of 7B2 on both the maturation and the activity of PC2.

The homogenate was first centrifuged at 7,500 g for 20 min. The supernatant (S1) was pelleted and the pellet separated by flotation on a sucrose gradient. We characterized the Golgi fraction using galactosyl transferase activity as a marker and the ER fraction using BiP/GRP78 as a marker (Table II). The Golgi fraction contained a small quantity of BiP which could be relevant to a small amount of contamination by ER membranes as well as to the cycling of BiP between the cis-Golgi and the ER (for review see Pelham, 1991; Hammond and Helenius, 1994). The proPC2 content of these fractions was quantitated by immunoblotting (Table II), using proPC2 purified from CHO cell medium as a standard (Lamango et al., 1996). ProPC2 was slightly more concentrated in the Golgi membranes, but the total content was higher in the ER fraction.

View larger version (40K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 9 7B2-induced activation of proPC2 from Golgi membranes. (a) Subcellular fractions (3 µg protein) corresponding to the supernatant of the first centrifugation (S1) and to Golgi- and ER-enriched membranes were incubated at pH 5 at 37°C for 30 min in the presence or absence of 200 nM recombinant 21-kD 7B2 (21 kD) and of 1 µM CT peptide (CT). The reaction was stopped by the addition of Laemmli sample buffer and boiled for 5 min before PC2 immunoblotting. (b) Subcellular fractions (1 µg protein) were incubated under the same conditions as in a and in the presence of 200 µM Pyr-Glu-Arg-Thr-Lys-Arg-AMC. Fluorescence was measured and PC2 specific activity was calculated. Black bars correspond to the control incubations, grey bars to the incubations with the recombinant 21-kD 7B2, and white bars to the incubation with the recombinant 21-kD 7B2 and the CT peptide.

7B2-induced Activation of PC2 is pH and Calcium dependent
We investigated the pH dependency of proPC2 conversion and PC2 activity measurable in the presence of 7B2 in the Golgi fraction. ProPC2 maturation was maximal at pH 5. It was much lower at pH 5.5 and was not detected when the pH was higher than this (Fig. 10 a). This correlated with the enzymatic activity which exhibited a pH optimum of 5 (Fig. 10 a). When the Golgi fraction was incubated in the absence of calcium and in the presence of EDTA, pro PC2 maturation was partly inhibited, and PC2 activity was completely inhibited (Fig. 10 b). These results are consistent with the data available concerning PC2 activity (Bennett et al., 1992; Lindberg et al., 1995; Shennan et al., 1995; Lamango et al., 1996).

View larger version (72K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 10 7B2-induced activation of proPC2 is pH and calcium dependent. (a) Golgi-enriched membranes were incubated at different pH at 37°C in the presence of 200 nM recombinant 21-kD 7B2. The reaction was stopped by the addition of Laemmli sample buffer and boiled for 5 min before PC2 immunoblotting. (b) Golgi-enriched membranes were incubated in the presence or absence of 200 nM recombinant 21-kD 7B2 (21 kD) and of 5 mM calcium at 37°C for 30 min. When calcium was omitted, it was replaced by 2 mM EDTA. The reaction was stopped by the addition of Laemmli sample buffer and boiled for 5 min before PC2 immunoblotting. Alternatively, the same incubations were performed to measure PC2 activity. Activity measurements are presented on the bottom line under the immunoblots as percent of the maximum activity detected.

View larger version (67K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 11 7B2 can protect proPC2 from inactivation at low pH. (a) Golgi-enriched membranes were preincubated (pre) in the presence or absence of 200 nM recombinant 21 kD 7B2 (21 kD) and of 100 mM Na acetate, pH 5, at 37°C. After a 30-min preincubation, the reactions were stopped by the addition of Laemmli sample buffer and boiled for 5 min before PC2 immunoblotting. (b) Membranes which had been preincubated as described in a were then incubated in complete medium containing recombinant 7B2 and 100 mM Na acetate, pH 5, buffer at 37°C. After a 30-min incubation, the reactions were stopped by the addition of Laemmli sample buffer and boiled for 5 min before PC2 immunoblotting. (c) Alternatively, the same preincubations and incubations were performed to measure PC2 activity. Activity measurements correspond to the incubation periods. Results are expressed as percent of the maximum activity measured.

	Discussion

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 
The neuroendocrine protein 7B2 is a PC2-specific binding protein that facilitates proPC2 maturation in vivo (Zhu and Lindberg, 1995) as well as in vitro (Braks and Martens, 1995) and is required for the expression of PC2 activity in the medium of CHO cells (Zhu and Lindberg, 1995). The mechanism of these interactions has, however, not yet been determined. 7B2 could be involved in several steps of proPC2 posttranslational processing: folding in the ER, transport to the Golgi, or conversion into mature PC2.

Binding of 7B2 to ProPC2 Is a Late ER Event
7B2 and proPC2 bind within the secretory pathway (Braks and Martens, 1994). Both proteins are subject to proteolytic processing after their sulfation in the TGN (Benjannet et al., 1993; Paquet et al., 1994). There is, however, some discrepancy as to how these cleavages affect the coimmunoprecipitation of the two proteins (Fig. 1; Benjannet et al., 1995; Braks et al., 1996). These studies all agree on the binding of the 27-kD form of 7B2 to proPC2. Experiments using brefeldin A have demonstrated that this binding occurred before the molecules reach the TGN (Benjannet et al., 1995; Braks et al., 1996). As this fungal metabolite blocks intracellular transport out of the ER and fuses the Golgi saccules with the ER cisternae, it does not constitute an appropriate tool to distinguish ER from Golgi events (for review see Klausner et al., 1992). The coimmunoprecipitation of 7B2 with endoglycosidase H–sensitive proPC2 that we describe here more directly demonstrates that the complex is actually formed in the ER. Sulfation experiments suggest that 7B2 and proPC2 are transported to the TGN as a complex (Benjannet et al., 1995), which is in agreement with our analysis of the endoglycosidase H resistance of the 7B2-bound proPC2. However, the kinetics of cleavage and secretion of 7B2 and PC2 are very different from each other (Guest et al., 1992; Benjannet et al., 1993; Shen et al., 1993; Paquet et al., 1994; Zhou and Mains, 1994; Zhu and Lindberg, 1995). These kinetics are at apparent variance with the hypothesis of the binding of 7B2 to proPC2 in the ER followed by transport of the complex to the Golgi. The comparison between the release of newly synthesized and sulfated 7B2 and PC2 demonstrate that 7B2 and PC2 are not transported from the ER to the Golgi at the same rate after their syntheses. These two proteins, therefore, do not spend the same amount of time in the ER before they can bind to each other. Indeed, our kinetic experiments demonstrate that whereas newly synthesized 7B2 could bind to proPC2 soon after synthesis, newly synthesized proPC2 could not bind to 7B2 before a further chase. The 7B2–proPC2 complex is formed, therefore, in the ER with 7B2 and proPC2 molecules that have not been synthesized at the same time: proPC2 is older than the 7B2 to which it is bound. Finally, analysis of 7B2-bound proPC2 acquisition of endoglycosidase H resistance demonstrated that the complex is not accumulated in the ER but is rapidly transported to the Golgi. Therefore, the association of 7B2 with proPC2 represents a late event in the time period that proPC2 spends in the ER.

7B2 Is Not Involved in ProPC2 Folding
Previous studies of PC2 and 7B2 biosynthesis provided evidence for another important difference between 7B2 and proPC2 exit from the ER: whereas radiolabeled 7B2 exits the ER as a homogenous pool within a short time span, the exit of a radiolabeled population of proPC2 molecules is widely spread in time (Guest et al., 1992; Benjannet et al., 1993; Shen et al., 1993; Paquet et al., 1994; Zhou and Mains, 1994; Zhu and Lindberg, 1995). In this paper we have also shown that whereas proPC2 secretion is sensitive to DTT treatment, 7B2 secretion is not, even though both proteins contain disulfide bridges. These results suggest differing requirements for 7B2 and proPC2 folding in the ER. The time spent in the ER is directly related to the folding of the proteins (for review see Lodish, 1988), and the long period that proPC2 requires in the ER environment could reflect the complex folding of this particular protein.

Like other members of the subtilisin-like convertase family, PC2 is synthesized as a proenzyme. Though the primary structure of the propeptide is poorly conserved between the PCs, its general organization is similar. In the case of subtilisin, the propeptide acts as an intramolecular chaperone (Zhu et al., 1989). This chaperone activity of the propeptide has been extended to the other subtilisin-like enzymes based on structural homologies (Siezen et al., 1995). Because PC2 is retained in the ER longer than the other PCs, it could be hypothesized that it may require some specific intermolecular chaperone activities. 7B2 could fulfill such a function, even though it is a secretory protein. Whereas the molecular chaperones present within the secretory pathway were at first restricted to ER-resident proteins, this notion has been extended, as members of the heat shock protein family cycle between the Golgi and the ER (Hammond and Helenius, 1994; Satoh et al., 1996) and as other secretory proteins, such as the receptor-associated protein (RAP), have been shown to exhibit chaperone activity in the ER (Bu and Rennke, 1996; Willnow et al., 1996). However, our experiments indicate that 7B2 does not modify the aggregation state of proPC2 in the ER nor the sensitivity of native proPC2 to N-glycanase F digestion. 7B2 does not modify the pattern of association of proPC2 with traditional chaperones like BiP/GRP78 or calnexin. We could also demonstrate that prevention of proper proPC2 folding suppresses rather than enhances 7B2 binding. Two additional lines of evidence are in agreement with the lack of involvement of 7B2 in proPC2 folding. First, preincubating subcellular membranes with recombinant 7B2 for increasing periods did not result in an increase of proPC2 activation, suggesting that 7B2 alone could not provide a proper conformation, but could only act on already properly folded proPC2. Second, swapping the PC2 proregion with furin and PC1 propeptide demonstrated that the PC2 propeptide is required for the binding of proPC2 to 7B2, but is not sufficient to confer 7B2 binding to PC1 (Zhu, X., unpublished results), thus suggesting that the propeptide is required for the proper folding of proPC2 (Siezen et al., 1995) rather than directly for 7B2 binding. Taken together, these various lines of evidence lead to the conclusion that 7B2 is not involved in the early steps of proPC2 folding and cannot be considered a bona fide folding chaperone.

7B2 Increases ProPC2 Transport to the Golgi
As 7B2 binds proPC2 in the ER, we investigated the effect of this binding on the exit from the ER and transport to the Golgi under experimental conditions that prevent proPC2 cleavage. Coexpression of 7B2 resulted in increased proPC2 acquisition of endoglycosidase H resistance, which paralleled the facilitation of proPC2 maturation (Zhu and Lindberg, 1995). This effect on proPC2 transport to the Golgi occurred through the binding of proPC2 to 7B2. 7B2 could act by stabilizing proPC2 in a conformation that is more transport competent. Indeed, we could demonstrate that 7B2-bound proPC2 does not accumulate in the ER but exits rapidly after the formation of the complex. Though potential differences in affinity between the antiserum directed against PC2 and that directed against 7B2 do not permit us to quantitate the proportion of proPC2 that reaches the Golgi bound to 7B2, our immunoprecipitation data indicate that the same amounts of total proPC2 and 7B2-bound proPC2 acquire endoglycosidase H resistance. These data imply that in AtT-20 cells, proPC2 reaches the Golgi mainly as a complex with 7B2, which could explain the high efficiency of 7B2 in promoting proPC2 maturation in AtT-20 cells. Studies using several constitutive cell lines that lack 7B2 have demonstrated, however, that proPC2 can, in fact, exit the ER in the absence of 7B2 (Benjannet et al., 1993; Shen et al., 1993). Rather than actually providing a transport-competent conformation to proPC2, which would be indicative of a folding activity, or providing transport competence to proPC2, which is apparently not required in constitutive cell lines, we propose that 7B2 stabilizes a transport-competent conformation of proPC2. This stabilization results in an increase in transport to the Golgi, which would nevertheless occur, albeit at a slower rate, without 7B2.

7B2 Is Required for ProPC2 Activation
Apart from the facilitation of proPC2 maturation, which could be explained by the increased transport of proPC2 only, 7B2 is also required to obtain activatable proPC2 from the medium of CHO cells (Zhu and Lindberg, 1995; Lamango et al., 1996). To study the conditions required for 7B2 effects on proPC2 activatability, we used an in vitro system based on the subcellular fractionation of CHO cells that express PC2 but not 7B2. Adding recombinant 21-kD 7B2 to the membrane fractions at pH 5 in the presence of detergent and calcium resulted in the detection of proPC2 conversion and PC2 activity. This demonstrates the direct involvement of 7B2 in the activation process of proPC2. The greatest quantity of activatable proPC2 was present in the Golgi fraction, which is consistent with our observation that 7B2 binds to folded proPC2. Our in vitro system permitted us to correlate proPC2 activity with the removal of the propeptide. We could observe, however, the formation of some 66-kD mature PC2 without detecting PC2 activity when membranes were incubated in the absence of detergent, thus preventing the presence of 7B2 in the membrane compartments that contain proPC2 (not shown). These experimental conditions resemble a physiological situation in which proPC2 reaches an acidic pH in the TGN with removal of the propeptide in the absence of 7B2. Indeed, proPC2 is released as a mixture of proPC2 and processed PC2 from constitutive cells lacking 7B2 (Benjannet et al., 1993; Shen et al., 1993). This released proPC2/PC2 is neither active nor activatable, however (Shen et al., 1993). In fact, 7B2 coexpression did not modify the kinetics of proPC2 secretion from CHO cells, but increased the ratio of proPC2/PC2 present in the secretion medium (Liu, J., I. Lindberg, and L. Muller, unpublished observations). The same increased ratio of proPC2/PC2 in the presence of 7B2 has been described in BSC40 cells (Benjannet et al., 1995). We have also recently identified a point mutation in the PC2 catalytic domain that uncouples removal of the propeptide from actual activation, i.e., acquisition of enzymatic activity: this mutation results in an increased rate of propeptide removal, but also a lack of 7B2 binding and of enzyme activity (Zhu, X., unpublished observations). Taken together, these data demonstrate that whereas the PC2 propeptide can be cleaved from proPC2 in the absence of 7B2, this cleavage only results in the formation of inactive enzyme. These data support a direct link between 7B2 and proPC2 activation.

Our experimental system of in vitro activation of the proPC2 present in the Golgi membranes of CHO cells, however, does not permit us to determine the mechanistic difference between the conversion of proPC2 to an active or inactive form. The cleavage site of proPC2 propeptide (RKKR) is a consensus site for several PCs, including furin, which is responsible for the cleavage of proproteins in the constitutive pathway. The autocatalytic conversion of proPC2 has been proposed (Matthews et al., 1994), and is by analogy with furin, PC1 and subtilisin most probably intramolecular, but it is not known whether the unproductive cleavage of proPC2, i.e., the cleavage of the propeptide that results in the production of an inactive enzyme, is also autocatalytic, or if another enzyme is involved.

Taken together, our results provide a general scheme of the interaction of 7B2 with proPC2 within the neuroendocrine secretory pathway (Fig. 12). ProPC2 folding is a slow process. Whereas PC2 propeptide might be involved in this folding, 7B2 does not seem to be actively involved in the early steps. This process could consist in the cycling of proPC2 between partially folded intermediates and an unstable folded transport-competent form which could be stabilized by 7B2. This stabilization results in the increase of proPC2 transport to the Golgi. Once the complex has reached the Golgi, proPC2 oligosaccharides undergo their maturation before processing of proPC2 in the TGN/secretory granules. The low pH and high calcium of these intracellular compartments triggers the conversion of proPC2 into mature PC2. The proPC2 bound to 7B2 will undergo an activation process, whereas the free proPC2 will also be processed, most probably in the same subcellular compartments, but will not thereby be activated. Our experiments demonstrate, therefore, that 7B2, which is neither a folding chaperone nor a subunit of the enzymatic complex, can actually induce the activation of proPC2 according to a unique pathway. Our experimental system of proPC2 maturation in vitro from subcellular fractions should permit us to study more precisely the molecular mechanism of PC2 activation in the presence of 7B2.

View larger version (16K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 12 Schematic representation of the steps of proPC2 posttranslational maturation in which 7B2 is involved. (1) 7B2 binds to folded proPC2 but not to unfolded proPC2. (2) The proPC2–7B2 complex formed in the ER is transported to the Golgi at a higher rate than proPC2 is alone (double arrow). (3) 7B2-bound proPC2 can undergo activation when it reaches the TGN/secretory granules which possess the requisite low pH and high calcium environment. PC2 propeptide is represented by the VVVV. Only two of the three potential glycosylation sites of PC2 are represented by the Y. The acquisition of endoglycosidase H resistance by one of the two oligosaccharides is indicated by .

	Acknowledgments

 
We thank J. Finley (Louisiana State University Medical Center) for her expertise with cell culture. We acknowledge J. Liu (Louisiana State University Medical Center) and Y. Fortenberry (Louisiana State University Medical Center) who initiated some of these experiments. We also wish to thank P. Arvan (Albert Einstein College of Medicine) and G. Martens (University of Nijmegen) for gifts of antisera, and E. Etienne (Collège de France, Paris, France) for photographic work.

This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants (DA05084 and DK49703) to I. Lindberg, who was supported by a Research Scientist Development Award (K02 D00204) from National Institute of Drug Abuse (NIDA). X. Zhu was supported by a postdoctoral fellowship (F32 DA05700) from NIDA.

Submitted: 17 June 1997

Revised: 9 September 1997

Address all correspondence to Iris Lindberg, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Louisiana State University Medical Center, 1901 Perdido Street, New Orleans, LA 70112. Tel.: (504) 568-4799. Fax: (504) 568-3370. E-mail: ilindb{at}lsumc.edu

	References

Top Abstract Materials and Methods Results Discussion References

 

Ayoubi TAY, van Duijnhoven HLP, van de Ven WJM, Jenks BG, Roubos EW & Martens GJM. The neuroendocrine polypeptide 7B2 is a precursor protein, J Biol Chem, 1990, 265, 15644–15647.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Baeuerle PA & Huttner WB. Tyrosine sulfation is a trans-Golgi-specific protein modification, J Cell Biol, 1987, 105, 2655–2664.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Benjannet S, Rondeau N, Paquet L, Boudreault A, Lazure C, Chretien M & Siedah NG. Comparative biosynthesis, glycosylation, and efficiency of prosegment cleavage of the prohormone convertases PC1 and PC2, Biochem J, 1993, 294, 735–743.[Medline]

Benjannet S, Savaria D, Chretien M & Seidah NG. 7B2 is a specific intracellular binding protein of the prohormone convertase PC2, J Neurochem, 1995, 64, 2303–2311.[Medline]

Bennett DL, Bailyes EM, Nielsen E, Guest PC, Rutherford NG, Arden SD & Hutton JC. Identification of the type 2 proinsulin processing endopeptidase as PC2, a member of the eukaryotic subtilisin family, J Biol Chem, 1992, 267, 15229–15236.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bowman EJ, Siebers A & Altendorf K. Bafilomycins: a class of inhibitors of membrane ATPases from microorganisms, animal cells, and plant cells, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1988, 85, 7972–7976.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Braakman I, Helenius J & Helenius A. Manipulating disulfide bond formation and protein folding in the endoplasmic reticulum, EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J, 1992, 11, 1717–1722.[Medline]

Braks JAM & Martens GJM. 7B2 is a neuroendocrine chaperone that transiently interacts with prohormone convertase PC2 in the secretory pathway, Cell, 1994, 78, 263–273.[Medline]

Braks JAM & Martens GJM. The neuroendocrine chaperone 7B2 can enhance in vitro POMC cleavage by prohormone convertase PC2, FEBS (Fed Eur Biochem Soc) Lett, 1995, 371, 154–158.[Medline]

Braks JAM, Van Horssen AM & Martens GJM. Dissociation of the complex between the neuroendocrine chaperone 7B2 and prohormone convertase PC2 is not associated with proPC2 maturation, Eur J Biochem, 1996, 238, 505–510.[Medline]

Bresnahan PA, Leduc R, Thomas L, Thorner J, Gibson HL, Brake AJ, Barr PJ & Thomas G. Human fur gene encodes a yeast KEX2-like endoprotease that cleaves pro-beta-NGF in vivo, J Cell Biol, 1990, 111, 2851–2859.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bu G & Rennke S. Receptor-associated protein is a folding chaperone for low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein, J Biol Chem, 1996, 271, 22218–22224.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Chaney W, Sundaram S, Friedman N & Stanely P. The Lec4A CHO glycosylation mutant arises from miscompartmentalization of a Golgi glycosyltransferase, J Cell Biol, 1989, 109, 2089–2096.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Creemers JW, Usac EF, Bright NA, Van de Loo JW, Jansen E, Van de Ven WJM & Hutton JC. Identification of a transferable sorting domain for the regulated pathway in the prohormone convertase PC2, J Biol Chem, 1996, 271, 25284–25291.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

De Bie I, Marcinkiewicz M, Malide D, Lazure C, Nakayama K, Bendayan M & Seidah NG. The isoforms of proprotein convertase PC5 are sorted to different subcellular compartments, J Cell Biol, 1996, 135, 1261–1275.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Feng W, Huth JR, Norton SE & Ruddon RW. Asparagine-linked oligosaccharides facilitate human chorionic gonadotropin β-subunit folding but not assembly of prefolded β with , Endocrinology, 1995, 138, 52–61.[Medline]

Gething MJ & Sambrook J. Protein folding in the cell, Nature (Lond), 1992, 355, 33–45.[Medline]

Guest PC, Arden SD, Bennett DL, Clark A, Rutherford NG & Hutton JC. The post-translational processing and intracellular sorting of PC2 in the islets of Langerhans, J Biol Chem, 1992, 267, 22401–22406.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hamond C & Helenius A. Quality control in the secretory pathway: retention of a misfolded viral membrane glycoprotein involves cycling between the ER, intermediate compartment, and Golgi apparatus, J Cell Biol, 1994, 126, 41–52.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hartl FU. Molecular chaperones in cellular protein folding, Nature (Lond), 1996, 381, 571–580.[Medline]

Hatsuzawa K, Hosaka M, Nakagawa T, Nagase M, Shoda A, Murakami K & Nakayama K. Structure and expression of mouse furin, a yeast Kex2-related protease. Lack of processing of coexpressed prorenin in GH4C1 cells, J Biol Chem, 1990, 265, 22075–22078.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Hatsuzawa K, Nagahama M, Takahashi K, Takada K, Murakami K & Nakayama K. Purification and characterization of furin, a Kex2-like processing endoprotease, produced in Chinese hamster ovary cells, J Biol Chem, 1992, 1267, 16094–16099.

Helenius A. How N-linked oligosaccharides affect glycoprotein folding in the endoplasmic reticlum, Mol Biol Cell, 1994, 5, 253–265.[Medline]

Hendrick JP & Hartl FU. Molecular chaperone functions of heat-shock proteins, Annu Rev Biochem, 1993, 62, 349–384.[Medline]

Hsi KL, Seidah NG, De Serres G & Chretien M. Isolation and NH2-terminal sequence of a novel porcine anterior pituitary polypeptide. Homology to proinsulin, secretin and Rous sarcoma virus transforming protein TVFV60, FEBS (Fed Eur Biochem Soc) Lett, 1982, 147, 261–266.

Hurtley SM & Helenius A. Protein oligomerization in the endoplasmic reticulum, Annu Rev Cell Biol, 1989, 5, 277–307.

Kelly RB. Pathways of protein secretion in eukaryotes, Science (Wash DC), 1985, 230, 25–32.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kiefer MC, Tucker JE, Joh R, Landsberg KE, Saltman D & Barr PJ. Identification of a second human subtilisin-like protease gene in the fes/fps region of chromosome 15, DNA Cell Biol, 1991, 10, 757–769.[Medline]

Kim PS, Kwon OY & Arvan P. An endoplasmic reticulum storage disease causing congenital goiter with hypothyroidism, J Cell Biol, 1996, 133, 517–527.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Klausner RD, Donaldson JG & Lippincott-Schwartz J. Brefeldin A: insights into the control of membrane traffic and organelle structure, J Cell Biol, 1992, 116, 1071–1080.[Free Full Text]

Lamango NS, Zhu X & Lindberg I. Purification and enzymatic characterization of recombinant prohormone convertase 2: stabilization of activity by 21 kD 7B2, Arch Biochem Biophys, 1996, 330, 238–250.[Medline]

Lindberg I. Evidence for the cleavage of the PC1/PC3 prosegment in the endoplasmic reticulum, Mol Cell Neurosci, 1994, 5, 263–268.[Medline]

Lindberg I, Van den Hurk WH, Bui C & Batie CJ. Enzymatic characterization of immunopurified prohormone convertase 2. Potent inhibition by a 7B2 peptide fragment, Biochemistry, 1995, 34, 5486–5493.[Medline]

Lodish HF. Transport of secretory and membrane glycoproteins from the rough endoplasmic reticulum to the Golgi. A rate-limiting step in protein maturation and secretion, J Biol Chem, 1988, 263, 2107–2110.[Free Full Text]

Lodish HF & Kong N. The secretory pathway is normal in dithiothreitol-treated cells, but disulfide-bonded proteins are reduced and reversibly retained in the endoplasmic reticulum, J Biol Chem, 1993, 268, 20598–20605.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mains RE, Milgram SL, Keutman HT & Eipper BA. The NH2-terminal proregion of peptidylglycine alpha-amidating monooxygenase facilitates the secretion of soluble proteins, Mol Endocrinol, 1995, 9, 3–13.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Martens GJ, Bussemakers MJ & Jenks BG. The novel pituitary polypeptide 7B2 is a highly-conserved protein coexpressed with proopiomelanocortin, Eur J Biochem, 1989, 181, 75–79.[Medline]

Martens GJM, Braks JAM, Eib DW, Zhou Y & Lindberg I. The neuroendocrine polypeptide 7B2 is an endogenous inhibitor of prohormone convertase PC2, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1994, 91, 5784–5787.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Matthews G, Shennan KIJ, Seal AJ, Taylor NA, Colman A & Docherty K. Autocatalytic maturation of the prohormone convertase PC2, J Biol Chem, 1994, 269, 588–592.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Molloy SS, Bresnahan PA, Leppla SH, Klimpel KR & Thomas G. Human furin is a calcium-dependent serine endoprotease that recognizes the sequence Arg-X-X-Arg and efficiently cleaves anthrax toxin protective antigen, J Biol Chem, 1992, 267, 16396–16402.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Molloy SS, Thomas L, Van Slyke JK, Stenberg PE & Thomas G. Intracellular trafficking and activation of the furin proprotein convertase: localization to the TGN and recycling from the cell surface, EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J, 1994, 13, 18–33.[Medline]

Muller L, Barret A, Picart R, Seidah NG & Tougard C. Immunocytochemical localization of the prohormone convertases PC1 and PC2 in rat prolactin cells, J Histochem Cytochem, 1997, 45, 1–8.[Free Full Text]

Nakayama K, Kim WS, Torii S, Hosaka M, Nakagawa T, Ikemizu J, Baba T & Murakami K. Identification of the fourth member of the mammalian endoprotease family homologous to the yeast Kex2 protease, J Biol Chem, 1992, 267, 5897–5900.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ou W-J, Cameron PH, Thomas DY & Bergeron JJM. Association of folding intermediates of glycoproteins with calnexin during protein maturation, Nature (Lond), 1993, 364, 771–776.[Medline]

Paquet L, Rondeau N, Seidah NG, Lazure C, Chretien M & Mbikay M. Immunological identification and sequence characterization of a peptide derived from the processing of neuroendocrine protein 7B2, FEBS (Fed Eur Biochem Soc) Lett, 1991, 294, 23–26.

Paquet L, Bergeron F, Boudreault A, Seidah NG, Chretien M, Mbikay M & Lazure C. The neuroendocrine precursor 7B2 is a sulfated protein proteolytically processed by a ubiquitous furinlike convertase, J Biol Chem, 1994, 269, 19279–19285.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Pelham HR. Recycling of proteins between the endoplasmic reticulum and Golgi complex, Curr Opin Cell Biol, 1991, 3, 585–591.[Medline]

Rothman JE. Polypeptide chain binding proteins: catalysts of protein folding and related processes in cells, Cell, 1989, 59, 591–601.[Medline]

Rouille Y, Duguay SJ, Lund K, Furuta M, Gong Q, Lipkind G, Oliva AA Jr, Chan SJ & Steiner DF. Proteolytic processing mechanisms in the biosynthesis of neuroendocrine peptides: the subtilisin-like proprotein convertases, Front Neuroendocrinol, 1995, 16, 322–361.[Medline]

Satoh M, Hirayoshi K, Yokota S, Hosokawa N & Nagata K. Intracellular interaction of collagen-specific stress protein HSP47 with newly synthesized procollagen, J Cell Biol, 1996, 133, 469–483.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Seidah NG, Gaspar L, Mion P, Marcinkiewicz M, Mbikay M & Chretien M. cDNA sequence of two distinct pituitary proteins homologous to Kex2 and furin gene products: tissue-specific mRNAs encoding candidates for pro-hormone processing proteinases, DNA Cell Biol, 1990, 9, 415–424.[Medline]

Seidah NG, Marcinkiewicz M, Benjannet S, Gaspar L, Beaubien G, Mattei MG, Lazure C, Mbikay M & Chretien M. Cloning and primary sequence of a mouse candidate prohormone convertase PC1 homologous to PC2, furin, and Kex2: distinct chromosomal localization and messenger RNA distribution in brain and pituitary compared to PC2, Mol Endocrinol, 1991, 5, 111–122.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Seidah NG, Day R, Hamelin J, Gaspar A, Collard MW & Chretien M. Testicular expression of PC4 in the rat: molecular diversity of a novel germ cell-specific Kex2/subtilisin-like proprotein convertase, Mol Endocrinol, 1992, 6, 1559–1570.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Seidah NG & Chretien M. Pro-protein convertases of subtilisin/kexin family, Methods Enzymol, 1994, 244, 171–188.

Shen FS, Lindberg I & Seidah NG. Biosynthesis of the prohormone convertase PC2 in chinese hamster ovary cells and in rat insulinoma cells, J Biol Chem, 1993, 268, 24910–24915.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Shennan KIJ, Taylor NA, Jermany JL, Matthews G & Docherty K. Difference in pH optima and calcium requirements for maturation of the prohormone convertases PC2 and PC3 indicates different intracellular locations for these events, J Biol Chem, 1995, 270, 1402–1407.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Siezen RJ, Creemers JWM & Van de Ven WJM. Homology modeling of the catalytic domain of human furin: a model for the eukaryotic subtilisin-like proprotein convertases, Eur J Biochem, 1994, 222, 255–266.[Medline]

Siezen, R.J., J.A.M. Leunissen, and U. Shinde. 1995. Homology analysis of the propeptides of subtilisin-like serine proteases (subtilases). In Intramolecular Chaperones and Protein Folding. U. Shinde and N. Inouye, editors. R.G. Landes Company, Austin, TX. 233–256.

Simons JF, Ferro-Novick S, Rose MD & Helenius A. BiP/Kar2p serves as a molecular chaperone during carboxypeptidase Y folding in yeast, J Cell Biol, 1995, 130, 41–49.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Smeekens SP, Avruch AS, LaMendola J, Chan SJ & Steiner DF. Identification of a cDNA encoding a second putative prohormone convertase related to PC2 in At20 cells and islets of Langerhans, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1991, 88, 340–344.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Umata T, Moriyama Y, Futai M & Mekada E. The cytotoxic action of diphtheria toxin and its degradation in intact Vero cells are inhibited by bafilomycin A1, a specific inhibitor of vacuolar-type H(+)-ATPase, J Biol Chem, 1990, 265, 21940–21945.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Van Duijnhoven HL, Verschusen MC, Timmer ED, Vissers PM, Groeneveld A, Ayoubi TA, Van den Ouweland AM & Van de Ven W J. Application of recombinant DNA technology in epitope mapping and targeting. Development and characterization of a panel of monoclonal antibodies against the 7B2 neuroendocrine protein, J Immunol Methods, 1991, 142, 187–198.[Medline]

Van Horssen AM, Van den Hurk WH, Bailyes EM, Hutton JC, Martens GJM & Lindberg I. Identification of the region within the neuroendocrine polypeptide 7B2 responsible for the inhibition of prohormone convertase PC2, J Biol Chem, 1995, 270, 14292–14296.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vey M, Schafer W, Berghofer S, Klenk HD & Garten W. Maturation of the trans-Golgi network protease furin: compartmentalization of propeptide removal, substrate cleavage, and COOH-terminal truncation, J Cell Biol, 1994, 127, 1829–1842.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Willnow TE, Rohlman A, Horton J, Otani H, Braun JR, Hammer RE & Herz J. RAP, a specialized chaperone, prevents ligand-induced ER retention and degradation of LDL receptor-related endocytotic receptors, EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J, 1996, 15, 2632–2639.[Medline]

Yoshimori T, Yamamoto A, Moriyama Y, Futai M & Tashiro Y. Bafilomycin A1, a specific inhibitor of vacuolar-type H(+)-ATPase, inhibits acidification and protein degradation in lysosomes of cultured cells, J Biol Chem, 1991, 266, 17707–17712.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhou Y & Lindberg I. Purification and characterization of the prohormone convertase PC1(PC3), J Biol Chem, 1993, 268, 5615–5623.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhou A & Mains RE. Endoproteolytic processing of POMC and prohormone convertases 1 and 2 in neuroendocrine cells overexpressing PC1 or PC2, J Biol Chem, 1994, 269, 17440–17447.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhu X, Ohta Y, Jordan F & Inouye M. Prosequence of subtilisin can guide the refolding of denatured subtilisin in an intermolecular process, Nature (Lond), 1989, 339, 483–484.[Medline]

Zhu X & Lindberg I. 7B2 facilitates the maturation of proPC2 in neuroendocrine cells and is required for the expression of enzymatic activity, J Cell Biol, 1995, 129, 1641–1650.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhu X, Rouille Y, Lamango NS, Steiner DF & Lindberg I. Internal cleavage of the inhibitory 7B2 carboxyl-terminal peptide by PC2: a potential mechanism for its inactivation, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1996a, 93, 4919–4924.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Zhu X, Lamango NS & Lindberg I. Involvement of a polyproline helix-like structure in the interaction of 7B2 with prohormone convertase 2, J Biol Chem, 1996b, 271, 23582–23587.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Facebook

Reddit

Technorati

Twitter

This article has been cited by other articles:

• Katz, L. S., Gosmain, Y., Marthinet, E., Philippe, J. (2009). Pax6 Regulates the Proglucagon Processing Enzyme PC2 and Its Chaperone 7B2. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29: 2322-2334 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Gyamera-Acheampong, C., Mbikay, M. (2009). Proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 4 in mammalian fertility: a review. Hum Reprod Update 15: 237-247 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lee, S.-N., Lindberg, I. (2008). 7B2 Prevents Unfolding and Aggregation of Prohormone Convertase 2. Endocrinology 149: 4116-4127 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Rehfeld, J. F., Bundgaard, J. R., Hannibal, J., Zhu, X., Norrbom, C., Steiner, D. F., Friis-Hansen, L. (2008). The Cell-Specific Pattern of Cholecystokinin Peptides in Endocrine Cells Versus Neurons Is Governed by the Expression of Prohormone Convertases 1/3, 2, and 5/6. Endocrinology 149: 1600-1608 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Nillni, E. A. (2007). Regulation of Prohormone Convertases in Hypothalamic Neurons: Implications for ProThyrotropin-Releasing Hormone and Proopiomelanocortin. Endocrinology 148: 4191-4200 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lee, S.-N., Peng, B., Desjardins, R., Pintar, J. E, Day, R., Lindberg, I. (2007). Strain-specific steroidal control of pituitary function. J Endocrinol 192: 515-525 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Lee, S.-N., Hwang, J. R., Lindberg, I. (2006). Neuroendocrine Protein 7B2 Can Be Inactivated by Phosphorylation within the Secretory Pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 281: 3312-3320 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Kacprzak, M. M., Than, M. E., Juliano, L., Juliano, M. A., Bode, W., Lindberg, I. (2005). Mutations of the PC2 Substrate Binding Pocket Alter Enzyme Specificity. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 31850-31858 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Marzban, L., Trigo-Gonzalez, G., Verchere, C. B. (2005). Processing of Pro-Islet Amyloid Polypeptide in the Constitutive and Regulated Secretory Pathways of {beta} Cells. Mol. Endocrinol. 19: 2154-2163 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Laurent, V., Jaubert-Miazza, L., Desjardins, R., Day, R., Lindberg, I. (2004). Biosynthesis of Proopiomelanocortin-Derived Peptides in Prohormone Convertase 2 and 7B2 Null Mice. Endocrinology 145: 519-528 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Jiang, G., Zhang, B. B. (2003). Glucagon and regulation of glucose metabolism. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 284: E671-E678 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Laurent, V., Kimble, A., Peng, B., Zhu, P., Pintar, J. E., Steiner, D. F., Lindberg, I. (2002). Mortality in 7B2 null mice can be rescued by adrenalectomy: Involvement of dopamine in ACTH hypersecretion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 10.1073/pnas.261715099v1 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Fortenberry, Y., Hwang, J.-R., Apletalina, E. V., Lindberg, I. (2002). Functional Characterization of ProSAAS. SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES WITH 7B2. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 5175-5186 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Mazurkiewicz, J. E., Corliss, D., Slominski, A. (2000). Spatiotemporal Expression, Distribution, and Processing of POMC and POMC-derived Peptides in Murine Skin. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 48: 905-914 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Apletalina, E. V., Muller, L., Lindberg, I. (2000). Mutations in the Catalytic Domain of Prohormone Convertase 2 Result in Decreased Binding to 7B2 and Loss of Inhibition with 7B2 C-terminal Peptide. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 14667-14677 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Janzik, I., Macheroux, P., Amrhein, N., Schaller, A. (2000). LeSBT1, a Subtilase from Tomato Plants. OVEREXPRESSION IN INSECT CELLS, PURIFICATION, AND CHARACTERIZATION. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 5193-5199 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Toure, B. B., Munzer, J. S., Basak, A., Benjannet, S., Rochemont, J., Lazure, C., Chretien, M., Seidah, N. G. (2000). Biosynthesis and Enzymatic Characterization of Human SKI-1/S1P and the Processing of Its Inhibitory Prosegment. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 2349-2358 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Damholt, A. B., Buchan, A. M. J., Holst, J. J., Kofod, H. (1999). Proglucagon Processing Profile in Canine L Cells Expressing Endogenous Prohormone Convertase 1/3 and Prohormone Convertase 2. Endocrinology 140: 4800-4808 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Zhou, A., Webb, G., Zhu, X., Steiner, D. F. (1999). Proteolytic Processing in the Secretory Pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 20745-20748 [Full Text]  
• Muller, L., Zhu, P., Juliano, M. A., Juliano, L., Lindberg, I. (1999). A 36-Residue Peptide Contains All of the Information Required for 7B2-mediated Activation of Prohormone Convertase 2. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 21471-21477 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Zhou, A., Martin, S., Lipkind, G., LaMendola, J., Steiner, D. F. (1998). Regulatory Roles of the P Domain of the Subtilisin-like Prohormone Convertases. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 11107-11114 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Zhu, X., Muller, L., Mains, R. E., Lindberg, I. (1998). Structural Elements of PC2 Required for Interaction with Its Helper Protein 7B2. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 1158-1164 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Hwang, J. R., Siekhaus, D. E., Fuller, R. S., Taghert, P. H., Lindberg, I. (2000). Interaction of Drosophila melanogaster Prohormone Convertase 2 and 7B2. INSECT CELL-SPECIFIC PROCESSING AND SECRETION. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 17886-17893 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Muller, L., Cameron, A., Fortenberry, Y., Apletalina, E. V., Lindberg, I. (2000). Processing and Sorting of the Prohormone Convertase 2 Propeptide. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 39213-39222 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Creemers, J. W. M., van de Loo, J.-W. H. P., Plets, E., Hendershot, L. M., Van de Ven, W. J. M. (2000). Binding of BiP to the Processing Enzyme Lymphoma Proprotein Convertase Prevents Aggregation, but Slows Down Maturation. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 38842-38847 [Abstract] [Full Text]  
• Laurent, V., Kimble, A., Peng, B., Zhu, P., Pintar, J. E., Steiner, D. F., Lindberg, I. (2002). Mortality in 7B2 null mice can be rescued by adrenalectomy: Involvement of dopamine in ACTH hypersecretion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 3087-3092 [Abstract] [Full Text]  

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF, 521K) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Citation Map Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new content in the JCB Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Muller, L. Articles by Lindberg, I. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Muller, L. Articles by Lindberg, I. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?