Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF, 43K) Alert me when this article is cited Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JCB Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/1997//1061 $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 139, Number 4, , 1997 1061

Correction

Mandai et al. Vol. 139, No. 2, Oct. 20, 1997. Pages 517–528.In the above-mentioned manuscript, "kilodalton" was mistakenly inserted in place of "K_d" in three instances. On p. 522, first column, line 13, the sentence should read "The K_d value was calculated to be the order of 10^–7 M." Similar errors appear on p. 525, second column, one line from the bottom, and on p. 526, first column, line 6.

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Full Text (PDF, 43K) Alert me when this article is cited Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JCB Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                            What's this?