|
||
© The Rockefeller University Press,
0021-9525/1998//499 $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 142, Number 2,
, 1998 499-509
Articles |
Bassoon, a Novel Zinc-finger CAG/Glutamine-repeat Protein Selectively Localized at the Active Zone of Presynaptic Nerve Terminals



Institute for Cellular Biochemistry and Clinical Neurobiology, University of Hamburg, D-20246 Hamburg, Germany;
Institute for Human Genetics, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany; || Institute for Pharmacology and Toxicology, Medical Faculty, Otto von Guericke University, D-39120 Magdeburg, Germany; and ¶ Department of Neurobiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, South Birmingham, Alabama 35213-0021
The molecular architecture of the cytomatrix of presynaptic nerve terminals is poorly understood. Here we show that Bassoon, a novel protein of >400,000 Mr, is a new component of the presynaptic cytoskeleton. The murine bassoon gene maps to chromosome 9F. A comparison with the corresponding rat cDNA identified 10 exons within its protein-coding region. The Bassoon protein is predicted to contain two double-zinc fingers, several coiled-coil domains, and a stretch of polyglutamines (24 and 11 residues in rat and mouse, respectively). In some human proteins, e.g., Huntingtin, abnormal amplification of such poly-glutamine regions causes late-onset neurodegeneration. Bassoon is highly enriched in synaptic protein preparations. In cultured hippocampal neurons, Bassoon colocalizes with the synaptic vesicle protein synaptophysin and Piccolo, a presynaptic cytomatrix component. At the ultrastructural level, Bassoon is detected in axon terminals of hippocampal neurons where it is highly concentrated in the vicinity of the active zone. Immunogold labeling of synaptosomes revealed that Bassoon is associated with material interspersed between clear synaptic vesicles, and biochemical studies suggest a tight association with cytoskeletal structures. These data indicate that Bassoon is a strong candidate to be involved in cytomatrix organization at the site of neurotransmitter release.
Key Words: trinucleotide repeats mouse bassoon gene presynaptic terminals rat brain synapses
Abbreviations used in this paper: aa, amino acid; LIM, lin-11/ISL-1/mec-3-like; MAGUK, membrane-associated guanylate kinase homologue; PSD, postsynaptic density.
CHEMICAL synapses are sites of cell–cell contact between neurons mediating interneuronal communication. Both the presynaptic terminal and the postsynaptic compartment comprise a highly specialized cytoskeleton underlying the synaptic membranes (Burns and Augustine, 1995). This cortical cytoskeleton, together with cell adhesion molecules and components of the extracellular matrix, act to keep pre- and postsynaptic compartments in register (Hall and Sanes, 1993; Burns and Augustine, 1995; Garner and Kindler, 1996). At the postsynaptic side, an electron-dense meshwork of fine filaments, the postsynaptic density (PSD)1, underlies the membrane, and is thought to anchor and cluster neurotransmitter receptors. Molecules involved in this function include rapsyn/43K protein at the cholinergic neuromuscular junction (Froehner, 1991), gephyrin at glycinergic synapses, and SAP90/PSD-95, chapsyn-110/PSD-93, and SAP102 at glutamatergic central synapses (Garner and Kindler, 1996; Kirsch et al., 1996; Kennedy, 1997).
The presynaptic nerve terminal is the principal site of regulated neurotransmitter release. The region of the presynaptic plasmalemma over which synaptic vesicles dock, fuse, and release neurotransmitter is called the active zone (Landis et al., 1988). Typically, several hundred synaptic vesicles are localized in the vicinity of the active zone (Burns and Augustine, 1995). Although a number of proteins that are involved in synaptic vesicle fusion and endocytosis have been identified and characterized (Südhof, 1995; De Camilli and Takei, 1996), the cellular mechanisms restricting synaptic vesicle fusion to the active zone remain unclear. It is reasonable to assume that the cytomatrix at the active zone is intimately involved in determining the sites of synaptic vesicle fusion.
To date, only few cytomatrix proteins have been identified that may play a role in this process. One candidate protein is synapsin I, which has been reported to link synaptic vesicles to the presynaptic cytoskeleton (Landis et al., 1988; Hirokawa et al., 1989). Further candidates are members of the family of membrane-associated guanylate kinase homologues (MAGUKs), the Rab3 effector protein Rim, and the presynaptic cytomatrix component Piccolo. MAGUKs, including synapse-associated proteins SAP90/ PSD-95, SAP97, and chapsyn-110/PSD-93, are found in distinct presynaptic terminals, and bind and cluster presynaptic ion channels in vitro (Kistner et al., 1993; Kim et al., 1995; Müller et al., 1995; Kim et al., 1996). In addition, presynaptic MAGUK expression appears to be essential for the proper assembly of the neuromuscular synapse in Drosophila (Budnik et al., 1996; Thomas et al., 1997a; Thomas et al., 1997b). However, to date no specific function in synaptic vesicle docking and fusion could be assigned to MAGUKs. Rim is a large presynaptic zinc-finger protein that interacts with Rab3 in its GTP (but not GDP)-bound form and, when transfected into PC12 cells, enhances regulated exocytosis in an Rab3-dependent manner (Wang et al., 1997). Piccolo, a recently identified 420-kD cytoskeleton-associated protein, has been detected primarily within presynaptic nerve terminals of asymmetric type I synapses (Cases-Langhoff et al., 1996), but to date its function is unknown. Both Rim and Piccolo are highly enriched in synaptic junctional protein preparations (Cases-Langhoff et al., 1996; Wang et al., 1997).
In this study we have identified a novel protein that is found in the presynaptic compartments of rat brain synapses. It appears exquisitely localized to the area just proximal to the active zone. We refer to this protein as Bassoon, a novel member of the ensemble of presynaptic proteins that are involved in orchestrating events at the nerve terminal. Bassoon has two double-zinc finger domains known to be involved in protein–protein interactions (Sanchez-Garcia, 1994), three presumptive coiled-coil regions, and a stretch of 11 (mouse)–24 (rat) glutamine residues, most of them encoded by CAG repeats. This latter feature is shared, for example, with Huntingtin or the ataxins (for review see Reddy and Housman, 1997). Abnormal expansion of the CAG/ glutamine repeats in these genes/proteins is involved in a number of human genetic disorders, including Huntington's disease or autosomal dominant cerebellar ataxias, that are characterized by late onset of degeneration of particular groups of neurons (Reddy and Housman, 1997).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
gt11 expression library with polyclonal antibodies generated against a rat brain synaptic junction preparation as described previously (Kistner et al., 1993; Langnaese et al., 1996). Overlapping cDNA clones were obtained by several rounds of screening of 
gt10 (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) and
ZAP II (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) adult rat brain cDNA libraries with the 32P-labeled sap7f cDNA or mouse genomic clones. Parts of the mouse genomic Bassoon DNA were isolated by screening a 129 SVJ mouse genomic
FIXII library (Stratagene) with rat Bassoon probes. Deoxyoligonucleotides were derived from exon 4 sequences (5'-TGTTTTAGGAGTCCCAGGAGGCA-3'; 5'-TGAAGCAGAAAGGGCCACAGGGG-3'), and were used to identify P1 phages containing the bassoon gene by PCR (129 SVJ mouse genomic P1 library; Genome Systems Inc., St. Louis, MO). Exon-containing fragments were identified with rat Bassoon cDNA probes on Southern blots, isolated from agarose gels, and subcloned into pBluescript (Stratagene). Hybridization to
-phage bound to Hybond N filters was carried out at 65°C in Rapid-hyb buffer (Amersham Corp., Arlington Heights, IL) as described by the supplier. Sequencing of the cDNA clones subcloned into pBluescript vectors was performed using the fluorescent dye dideoxy termination method in combination with an automated DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, CA). Sequences were analyzed with the GCG program package (Genetics Computer Group, Inc., Madison, WI).
Antibody Production
The cDNA insert of sap7f (733 bp) was subcloned into the unique EcoRI site of the bacterial expression vector pGEX-
1T (Pharmacia Biotech Sverige, Uppsala, Sweden). A 75-kD glutathione S-transferase (GST)- Bassoon fusion protein was expressed in Escherichia coli XL Blue and purified on glutathione-sepharose 4B as described by the manufacturer (Pharmacia Biotech Sverige). The fusion protein was used to generate Bassoon antibodies in mice and rabbits. The IgG fraction of rabbit antisera was isolated using GammaBind Plus SepharoseTM (Pharmacia Biotech Sverige) following the instructions of the manufacturer. The monoclonal antibody mab7f was produced by the Univeristy of Alabama at Birmingham hybridoma facilities. Antibodies against Piccolo were generated as described previously (Cases-Langhoff et al., 1996). Rabbit antiserum against synapsin I was provided by Dr. M. Mäder, Göttingen, Germany. Monoclonal antibody against synaptophysin was purchased from Boehringer Mannheim (Mannheim, Germany).
RNA Preparation, Northern Analysis, and In Situ Hybridization
Isolation of total RNA from several rat tissues as well as Northern blotting and hybridization with 32P-labeled sap7f cDNA probes was performed as described (Langnaese et al., 1997).
In situ hybridization experiments were performed as described previously (Langnaese et al., 1997) with a 40-mer antisense oligonucleotide derived from the Bassoon cDNA (5'-ACAGCGGTGTCGTCTTCCTCCAAGTTGTCTTCCTCGGCGC-3'). Identical results were obtained with three independent oligonucleotides. Controls including competition with 100-fold excess of unlabeled oligonucleotide, RNAase treatment of sections before hybridization or hybridization with sense probe did not yield any specific signal (see Fig. 1 C). Hybridization signals were visualized with a Fujix BAS 3000 Bio Imager (Fuji Photo Film Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan).
|
Isolation of Subcellular Protein Fractions and Immunoblot Analysis
Tissue fractionation was carried out essentially as described by Carlin et al. (1980) with some modifications: brains of 30-d-old rats were homogenized in homogenization buffer (5 mM Hepes, pH 7.4; 320 mM sucrose) containing a protease inhibitor cocktail (Boehringer Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany); cell debris and nuclei were removed by 1,000 g centrifugation. The supernatant was spun for 20 min at 13,000 g, resulting in supernatant S2 and pellet P2 (crude membrane fraction). S2 was centrifuged at 100,000 g for 1 h, and the resulting supernatant was taken as cytoplasmic fraction (S100). The P2 pellet was further fractionated by centrifugation in a sucrose step gradient as described by Carlin et al. (1980). For isolation of the synaptic junctional proteins (PSD fraction), the synaptosomal fraction of the first gradient was diluted with 320 mM sucrose (60 ml/10g wet tissue) and an equal volume of 1% Triton X-100, 320 mM sucrose, and 12 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.1. The suspension was kept on ice for 15 min, and was centrifuged for 30 min at 32,800 g. The pellet was resuspended in 320 mM sucrose, 1 mM NaHCO3 (6 ml/10 g wet tissue), and an equal volume of 1% Triton X-100. 320 mM sucrose was added, and synaptic junctional proteins were pelleted by a 2-h centrifugation at 201,800 g. All steps were carried out at 4°C.
Extraction experiments of P2 pellets with various agents as specified in Table I were performed in the following way: P2 pellets were resuspended in homogenization buffer, aliquoted into six samples (200 µg protein each), and centrifuged at 15,000 g for 20 min. Each pellet was then resuspended in 0.5 ml of one of the extraction buffers, incubated for 15 min at 4°C by gentle shaking, and centrifuged again for 15 min at 100,000 g. The resulting pellets were washed in homogenization buffer and dissolved in 80 µl gel-loading buffer (Laemmli, 1970). The supernatants were precipitated with trichloro acetic acid, and the resulting pellets were dissolved in 80 µl loading buffer. For SDS-PAGE, 20 µl/lane of each fraction were loaded. Proteins were separated on 5–20% polyacrylamide gels under fully reducing conditions, and were transferred onto nitrocellulose. For immunodetection, Western blots were incubated overnight with primary antibody and processed using the ECL detection system (Amersham Buchler, Braunschweig, Germany).
|
Immunohistochemistry of Tissue Sections
30-d-old male rats were used for immunohistochemical studies. Tissue preparation for microscopic analysis was done as described (Richter et al., 1996). Sections were incubated for 2 d at room temperature with mab7f Bassoon antibody (1:5,000 dilution) in combination with rabbit antiserum against synapsin I (1:500 dilution). After three washes with PBS, application of secondary antibodies coupled to Cy3 or Cy2 followed for 1 h at room temperature. Secondary antibodies were diluted 1:250 when coupled to Cy3, and 1:100 when coupled to Cy2. Both possible combinations of secondary antibodies, i.e., anti-rabbit Cy2/anti-mouse Cy3 and anti-rabbit Cy3/anti-mouse Cy2, were used to exclude fluorescent dye effects and yielded identical results. Analysis was done by confocal microscopy (TCS4D; Leica Mikrosysteme GmbH) and scans in several consecutive layers were saved as single images.
Immunoelectron Microscopy
30-d-old male rats were used for immunohistochemical studies. Tissue preparation for electron microscopic analysis was done as described by Richter et al. (1996). To test for nonspecific immunolabeling, sections were incubated exactly as described above, but in the absence of the first antibody, with preimmune rabbit serum or with an antibody solution that was preincubated with the fusion protein (2.3 mg/ml). In no case was any nonspecific immunoreactivitiy observed.
Localization of Bassoon in isolated synaptic structures with gold-conjugated antibodies was done using a modified protocol of De Camilli et al. (1983b). In brief, cortex and cerebellum from P30 rat brain were homogenized in homogenization buffer (0.25 M sucrose, 25 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 2 mM EGTA in 10 mM phosphate buffer, pH 7.4) and centrifuged for 10 min at 1,000 g to remove nuclei and cell debris. The supernatant (5 ml) was mixed with 35 ml fixation buffer (3% paraformaldehyde, 0.1% glutardialdehyde in 5 mM phosphate buffer), kept on ice for 30 min, and spun at 13,000 g for 45 min. The resulting pellet was rehomogenized in 0.6 ml of 5 mM phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), mixed with an equal volume of prewarmed 2% agarose in 5 mM phosphate buffer, and gently poured into coverslip frames. The agarose blocks were cut into 60-µm slices using a vibratom (Leica Inc., Deerfield, IL) and incubated for 30 min at room temperature in PBS containing 5% BSA and 0.1% CWF skin gelatin (Aurion) to block nonspecific binding. After this preincubation, sections were incubated overnight with rabbit anti-Bassoon antibody diluted 1:100 in PBS containing 0.1% BSA-C (Aurion, Wageningen, The Netherlands) and 0.2% sodium azide at room temperature. The sections were rinsed in BSA-C/PBS (3 x 10 min) and incubated with 50-fold diluted anti-rabbit IgG gold conjugate (5 nm; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO) in BSA-C/PBS for 4 h. After extensive washing in PBS, sections were postfixed in 2% glutardialdehyde in PBS (15 min), and in 1% osmium tetroxide in PBS for 1 h. Further preparation for electron microscopic analysis was performed as described by Richter et al. (1996). The ultrathin sections were examined with a Leo912 electron microscope (Leo Elektronenmikroskopie GmbH, Oberkochen, Germany) and imaged with a Megascan 2K CCD camera (Gatan, Inc., Plasanton, CA) using the digital micrograph Gatan 2.5 software.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
13 kb in the brain, but not in liver, heart, skeletal muscle, or C6 glioma cells (Fig. 1 A), nor in testis, kidney, spleen, or thymus (data not shown). To determine the transcript distribution in the brain, in situ hybridization experiments were performed with a 35S- labeled antisense oligonucleotide probe. As shown in Fig. 1 B, sap7f transcripts are widely expressed in the rat brain with highest levels in the cerebellum, the hippocampal formation, the piriform cortex, and the cerebral cortex. Application of 100-fold excess of unlabeled oligonucleotide specifically blocked hybridization signals (Fig. 1 C).
Starting with sap7f cDNA as probe, a set of overlapping clones spanning the entire protein coding region and parts of the untranslated regions of the corresponding mRNA was isolated from rat brain cDNA libraries (Fig. 2 A). Moreover, recombinant
- and P1-phages were isolated containing the murine bassoon gene, and its exon–intron organization was determined by comparing mouse genomic DNA and rat cDNA. The gene has at least 13 exons, 10 of which harbor the entire open reading frame for Bassoon (Fig. 2 B). The positions of these introns with respect to the protein sequence are indicated in Fig. 3 A. Interestingly, approximately half of the cDNA sequence is contained in the large exon 5 (6.6 kb). The gene displays a rather compact structure in the region of exons 4–11 containing only introns <2 kb. In contrast, exons 1, 2, and 3 are spaced by larger introns. The 5' end of the gene has not yet been identified. Using FISH, the bassoon gene has been mapped to mouse chromosome 9F (data not shown).
|
|
420 kD. The overall sequence identity of the two proteins is 96%. The putative initiation site for translation in rat and mouse (CCACCAUGG) favorably coincide with the consensus motif described for vertebrates (Kozak, 1987). In rat cDNA the putative start codon is preceded by an in-frame stop codon. Comparison of nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences to public databases showed that Bassoon has no significant overall similarity to any known protein. However, computer analysis of the predicted amino acid sequence revealed that Bassoon harbors two zinc-finger domains (aas 162–223 and 457–518 in rat), each with two zinc-finger motifs. The two Bassoon motifs share a higher degree of sequence identity with each other (47%) than with the zinc fingers of any other protein included in public databases (Fig. 3 B). The most closely related double zinc fingers are those of rabphilin, the rabphilin-related protein Noc2, and the Rab3a-interacting molecule Rim. Between aas 568 and 588 of the rat sequence, a region of three consecutive heptad repeats occurs. The corresponding region of murine Bassoon contains two additional repeats of this motif (consensus sequence: K-A-S-P-Q-A/T-A/T/K). Proximal to the COOH terminus (rat aa 3775–3799), a stretch of 24 consecutive glutamine residues is predicted (Fig. 3 A). Nineteen of these glutamines—14 consecutive ones—are encoded by CAG triplets. Interestingly, the number of glutamines in murine Bassoon (11 residues; Fig. 3 A) differs from that in rat. A computer-assisted examination of secondary structure of Bassoon predicts long
-helical regions. In particular for three regions high probabilities for coiled-coil structures are predicted (Figs. 2 A and 3 A).
To characterize the protein encoded by the Bassoon transcript, rabbit polyclonal antisera and a mouse monoclonal antibody, mab7f, were generated against a recombinant fusion protein containing the sap7f-encoded polypeptide fragment. On immunoblots of rat brain membrane fractions, these antisera detect two major protein bands of >400 and 350 kD (Fig. 4). In addition, a number of smaller immunoreactive bands are detectable. We assume that mature Bassoon migrates at >400 kD, while the other protein bands are proteolytic degradation products. This assumption is based on several observations: (a) the apparent molecular mass of >400 kD favorably coincides with the calculated Mr of
420,000; (b) Two rabbit antisera and mab7f recognize a similar protein pattern on immunoblots (not shown), and yield identical results in immunohistochemistry (see below); (c) Both the number of bands <400 kD and their relative intensity as compared with that of the largest polypeptide varied from preparation to preparation (data not shown). (d) Northern analyses using probes derived from different regions of the Bassoon cDNA did not detect additional Bassoon transcripts in the adult brain, suggesting that the smaller polypeptides are not products from alternatively processed transcripts.
|
The above biochemical data suggest that Bassoon is a synaptic protein. This hypothesis was tested by performing double-fluorescence immunocytochemistry on primary cultures of hippocampal neurons using Bassoon antibodies in combination with antibodies against synaptic marker proteins. As shown in Fig. 5, A and B, Bassoon displays a punctate distribution on hippocampal neurons cultured for 21 d in vitro that is virtually identical to that of the synaptic vesicle protein synaptophysin (Wiedenmann and Franke, 1985). Also, Piccolo, a component of the presynaptic cytomatrix primarily of asymmetric type I synapses (Cases-Langhoff et al., 1996), is essentially co-distributed with Bassoon in processes of hippocampal neurons (Fig. 5, C and D). These observations support the view that Bassoon is a synaptic protein.
|
|
|
To assess the nature of Bassoon interaction with the presynaptic element, biochemical extraction studies were performed with various agents on the brain P2 crude membrane fraction. Neither high-salt conditions, nonionic detergents like Triton X-100 or Octylglucoside, nor zwitter ionic detergents such as CHAPS, are able to solubilize significant amounts of Bassoon (Table I). In contrast, combinations of CHAPS and high salt result in a partial solubilization of the protein. Combinations of nonionic detergents and high salt also lead to partial solubilization of Bassoon (data not shown); however, under these conditions enhanced proteolysis is observed to hinder the reliable interpretation of the results. One molar Tris-HCl that partly solubilizes spectrin from the cortical cytoskeleton (Hayes et al., 1991) does not release Bassoon. On the other hand, alkaline conditions that typically bring peripheral membrane proteins into solution also solubilize Bassoon, as do the chaotropic salt potassium rhodanite, urea, or the ionic detergent SDS. These results indicate that Bassoon is not an integral membrane protein, but tightly interacts with preparations of the membrane-associated cortical cytoskeleton.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Lessons from the Primary Structure of Bassoon
Bassoon is a very large polypeptide consisting of 3938 (rat) and 3942 (mouse) amino acid residues that do not belong to any known protein family. Nonetheless, Bassoon contains a number of sequence motifs that allow some speculation concerning its functions. Two double zinc-finger motifs are located in the amino-terminal part of Bassoon. Multiple classes of zinc finger–containing proteins have been described that are involved either in protein–nucleic acid or protein–protein interactions. The Bassoon zinc-finger motifs show some structural features related to LIM (lin-11/ISL-1/mec-3-like) domains, a steadily growing family of structural motifs involved in protein–protein interactions (Sánchez-Garcia, 1994). Typically, LIM domains appear as double zinc fingers with a finger loop size of 17 ± 1 residues and a spacing of two amino acid residues between the two fingers. With sizes of 16 (first loop) and 14 amino acids (second loop), the putative zinc fingers in Bassoon almost match this LIM motif size. The spacing between the two finger entities is four instead of two residues. Although Bassoon lacks a conserved coordinating histidine in the first finger structure as well as some other characteristic amino acid residues characteristic for LIM domain proteins, the structural features described above suggest a role for the zinc finger motif in protein–protein interactions. This protein–protein interaction is underscored by the fact that the Bassoon zinc-finger motifs show highest similarity to the zinc fingers of rabphilin (Shirataki et al., 1993), a protein known to interact with and regulate the activity of the synaptic vesicle–associated small GTPase Rab3 (for review see Südhof, 1997). Interestingly, Rim, another potential regulator of Rab3, also interacts with its target via a zinc-finger domain (Wang et al., 1997). The sizes of the zinc-finger loops of rabphilin, its relative Noc2 (Kotake et al., 1997), and Rim differ even more from those of typical LIM-type domains than the lengths of Bassoon zinc fingers. However, all four proteins share the four–amino acid residue spacing between the two finger structures (see Fig. 3 B). Thus, the zinc fingers of Bassoon may interact with vesicle-associated proteins in the presynapse, and may potentially be involved in regulating the synaptic vesicle cycle.
Superhelix-forming coiled-coil domains are another class of structural entities involved in inter- or intramolecular protein–protein interactions (Lupas, 1996). By computer analysis, Bassoon is predicted to have three coiled-coil–forming domains of various lengths that may play a role in the interaction of Bassoon with other presynaptic proteins. Another remarkable feature is the region of heptad repeats (K-A-S-P-Q-A/T-X) that varies in length between rat (three copies) and mouse (five copies) Bassoon. The repeats may serve as phosphorylation sites for proline-directed protein kinases, including stress-activated and mitogen-activated protein kinases (for review see Cohen, 1997). Proline-directed protein kinases are known to phosphorylate and thereby regulate a number of cellular substrates, including cytoskeletal components such as neurofilament proteins in response to various kinds of extracellular signals (Cohen, 1997; Giasson and Mushynski, 1997).
Intriguingly, proximal to the COOH-terminal end of Bassoon is a polyglutamine region encoded by multiple CAG codons. Also, this polyglutamine stretch is variable in length between the two species. The presence of expanded CAG repeats in a number of genes has been described, and has been directly implicated in dominantly inherited neurodegenerative disorders characterized by anticipation (for review see Reddy and Housman, 1997; Ross, 1997). These disorders include Huntington's disease caused by CAG expansion in the HD gene; spinobulbar muscular atrophy where the androgen receptor gene is affected; dentatorubral-pallidoluysian atrophy, and several types of spinocerebellar ataxias (Reddy and Housman, 1997; Ross, 1997). At present it is unclear whether the CAG repeats in the BASSOON gene are associated with any neurodegenerative disorder. Mapping of the mouse bassoon gene to chromosome 9F did not immediately suggest a candidate gene, but clearly will facilitate the characterization and mapping of the human BASSOON gene–an important first step in assessing its involvement in debilitating diseases.
Bassoon is Concentrated at the Presynaptic Active Zone
Bassoon exhibits a widespread synaptic distribution throughout the adult rat brain. High levels of Bassoon transcripts are observed in several brain regions including the hippocampus and the cerebellum. We have analyzed several types of synapses in these two brain regions for the distribution of Bassoon at the ultra-structural level. The most striking feature is the restricted distribution of Bassoon immunoreactivity within presynaptic terminals. This is most obvious in the large mossy fiber boutons in the stratum lucidum of the hippocampal CA3 region. These large fusiform expansions, filled with synaptic vesicles and mitochondria, are studded with excitatory synapses (Llinás and Walton, 1990; Amaral and Witter, 1994). Bassoon immunoreactivity is unevenly localized within these nerve terminals, and appears to be concentrated at regions of the presynaptic bouton that are juxtaposed to the PSD. This restricted localization contrasts with the much-wider distribution of other presynaptic proteins such as synapsin I (De Camilli et al., 1983a), synaptophysin (Wiedenmann and Franke, 1985; Kagotani et al., 1991), syntaxin (Garcia et al., 1995), and SNAP-25 (Garcia et al., 1995), and suggests a role for Bassoon in events occurring near or at the active zone. Immunogold localization studies on isolated synaptic structures support this view. Bassoon is found interspersed between a subpopulation of synaptic vesicles proximal to the synaptic cleft. However, no or very few Bassoon molecules appear to be associated directly with the presynaptic membrane facing the synaptic junction.
Electron microscopic studies of the presynapse have revealed the presence of a fine filamentous network anchored to the junctional plasmalemma (Landis et al., 1988; Hirokawa et al., 1989). In synaptic junction preparations, frequently vesicle-containing presynaptic structures that are not wrapped by a plasma membrane are observed. We assume that these structures represent the presynaptic cytomatrix that sticks to the junctional membrane as a gel-like amorphous network. Bassoon molecules are included in this cytomatrix.
In a recent study we described another presynaptic protein called Piccolo (Cases-Langhoff et al., 1996). This 420-kD protein is also found in a wide variety of presynaptic terminals throughout rat brain. This observation, as well as the colocalization of Piccolo and Bassoon in cultured hippocampal neurons shown here, implies that both proteins can occur in an overlapping, if not identical, set of synapses. Interestingly, the subsynaptic localization of Piccolo in asymmetric type I synapses, e.g., in hippocampal mossy fiber terminals, is virtually identical to that described here for Bassoon, suggesting that both proteins are concentrated near the active zone of the same synapse.
Immunogold localization studies presented here and in a previous paper (Cases-Langhoff et al., 1996) raise the question as to whether Bassoon and Piccolo may directly interact with synaptic vesicles. Immunoreactivity of both proteins is found in the light membrane fraction (see Fig. 4) which includes a major fraction of synaptic vesicles. Preliminary experiments suggest that Bassoon is present in crude conventional vesicle preparations as described by Huttner et al. (1983). There is, however, no enrichment of Bassoon immunoreactivity in this fraction, and at present we cannot exclude that Bassoon partitions into this fraction as a contamination (Sanmartí-Vila, unpublished observation). In any case, association with detergent-insoluble cytomatrix is much stronger than with detergent-soluble membrane fractions.
Possible Functional Implications
The restricted localization of Bassoon and Piccolo suggests that they serve specific functions at synaptic junctions. Both proteins are components of the presynaptic cytomatrix. As such they may play a role in the structural and functional organization of the synaptic vesicle cycle, i.e., the release of neurotransmitter by calcium-triggered exocytosis, the endocytotic retrieval of vesicles and the refilling with neurotransmitter (for review of the synaptic vesicle cycle see Südhof, 1995; De Camilli and Takei, 1996).
Synapsins are presynaptic proteins thought to anchor synaptic vesicles to actin filaments (Hirokawa et al., 1989). The exact localization of synapsin-associated synaptic vesicles within the presynaptic terminal is still a matter of debate (compare Pieribone et al., 1995; Rosahl et al., 1995). One hypothesis implies that synapsin I is associated with the reserve pool of vesicles that are localized in a zone distal from the transmitter release site, whereas vesicles in the proximal zone are devoid of synapsin I (Pieribone et al., 1995; Takei et al., 1995). We have shown that within the presynaptic terminal, Bassoon and Piccolo are concentrated adjacent to the synaptic cleft. This distribution is complementary to that proposed for synapsin I. Adopting the abovementioned hypothesis, Bassoon and Piccolo may be associated with synaptic vesicles of the release pool, and thus exert their functions (e.g., in synaptic vesicle cycling) in a compartment spatially distinct from that of synapsin I action.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 426, Kr1255/4-1) and the Fonds der Chemischen Industrie to E.D. Gundelfinger, and by the National Institutes of Health (P50 HD32901) and the Keck Foundation to C.C. Garner.
Submitted: 10 April 1998
Revised: 12 June 1998
S. tom Dieck, L. Sanmartí-Vila, and K. Langnaese contributed equally to this work. The present address of Heike Wex is Department of Human Genetics, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029-6514.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Amaral, D.G., and M.P. Witter. 1994. Hippocampal Formation. In The Rat Nervous System. G. Paxinos, editor. Academic Press Limited, London, United Kingdom. 443–494.
Budnik V, Koh YH, Guan B, Hartmann B, Hough C, Woods D & Gorczyca M. Regulation of synapse structure and function by the Drosophila tumor suppressor gene dlg, Neuron, 1996, 17, 627–640.[Medline]
Burns ME & Augustine GJ. Synaptic structure and function: dynamic organization yields architectural precision, Cell, 1995, 83, 187–194.[Medline]
Carlin RK, Grab DJ, Cohen RS & Siekevitz P. Isolation and characterization of postsynaptic densities from various brain regions: enrichment of different types of postsynaptic densities, J Cell Biol, 1980, 86, 831–843.
Cases-Langhoff C, Voss B, Garner AM, Appeltauer U, Takei K, Kindler S, Veh RW, De Camilli P, Gundelfinger ED & Garner CC. Piccolo, a novel 420 kDa protein associated with the presynaptic cytomatrix, Eur J Cell Biol, 1996, 69, 214–223.[Medline]
Cohen P. The search for physiological substrates of MAP and SAP kinases in mammalian cells, Trends Cell Biol, 1997, 7, 353–361.[Medline]
De Camilli P, Cameron R & Greengard P. Synapsin I (protein I), a nerve terminal-specific phosphoprotein. I. Its general distribution in synapses of the central and peripheral nervous system demonstrated by immunofluorescence in frozen and plastic sections, J Cell Biol, 1983a, 96, 1337–1354.
De Camilli P, Harris SM, Huttner WB & Greengard P. Synapsin I (protein I), a nerve terminal-specific phosphoprotein. II. Its specific association with synaptic vesicles demonstrated by immunocytochemistry in agarose-embedded synaptosomes, J Cell Biol, 1983b, 96, 1355–1373.
De Camilli P & Takei K. Molecular mechanisms in synaptic vesicle endocytosis and recycling, Neuron, 1996, 16, 481–486.[Medline]
Froehner SC. The submembrane machinery for nicotinic acetylcholine receptor clustering, J Cell Biol, 1991, 114, 1–7.
Garcia EP, McPherson PS, Chilcote TJ, Takei K & De Camilli P. rbSec1A and B colocalize with syntaxin 1 and SNAP-25 throughout the axon, but are not in a stable complex with syntaxin, J Cell Biol, 1995, 129, 105–120.
Garner, C.C., A. Garner, B. Voss, U. Appeltauer, and E.D. Gundelfinger. 1993. Identifying novel synapse associated proteins. In Neuronal Cytoskeleton– Morphogenesis, Transport and Synaptic Transmission. N. Hirokawa, editor. Japan Scientific Societies Press, Tokyo, Japan. 317–329.
Garner CC & Kindler S. Synaptic proteins and the assembly of synaptic junctions, Trends Cell Biol, 1996, 6, 429–433.[Medline]
Giasson BI & Mushynski WE. Study of proline-directed protein kinases involved in phosphorylation of the heavy neurofilament subunit, J Neurosci, 1997, 17, 9466–9472.
Goslin, K., and G. Banker. 1991. Rat hippocampal neurons in low-density culture. In Culturing Nerve Cells. G. Banker and K. Goslin, editors. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. 251–281.
Hall, Z.W., and J.R. Sanes. 1993. Synaptic structure and development: the neuromuscular junction. Cell. 72 (Suppl):99–121.
Hayes NVL, Rayner DA & Baines AJ. Purification and properties of p103, a novel 103-kDa component of postsynaptic densities, J Neurochem, 1991, 57, 397–405.[Medline]
Hirokawa N, Sobue K, Kanda K, Harada A & Yorifuji H. The cytoskeletal architecture of the presynaptic terminal and molecular structure of synapsin 1, J Cell Biol, 1989, 108, 111–126.
Huttner WB, Schiebler W, Greengard P & De Camilli P. Synapsin I (protein I), a nerve terminal-specific phosphoprotein. III. Its association with synaptic vesicles studied in a highly purified synaptic vesicle preparation, J Cell Biol, 1983, 96, 1374–1388.
Kagotani Y, Picart R, Barret A, Wiedenmann B, Huttner WB & Tixier-Vidal A. Subcellular localization of secretogranin II and synaptophysin by immunoelectron microscopy in differentiated hypothalamic neurons in culture, J Histochem Cytochem, 1991, 39, 1507–1518.[Abstract]
Kennedy M. The postsynaptic density at glutamatergic synapses, Trends Neurosci, 1997, 20, 264–268.[Medline]
Kim E, Niethammer M, Rothschild A, Jan YN & Sheng M. Clustering of shaker-type K+ channels by interaction with a family of membrane-associated guanylate kinases, Nature, 1995, 378, 85–88.[Medline]
Kim E, Cho K, Rothschild A & Sheng M. Heteromultimerization and NMDA receptor-clustering activity of chapsyn-110, a member of the PSD-95 family of proteins, Neuron, 1996, 17, 103–113.[Medline]
Kirsch J, Meyer G & Betz H. Synaptic targeting of ionotropic neurotransmitter receptors, Mol Cell Neurosci, 1996, 8, 93–98.[Medline]
Kistner U, Wenzel BM, Veh RW, Cases-Langhoff C, Garner AM, Appeltauer U, Voss B, Gundelfinger ED & Garner CC. SAP90, a rat presynaptic protein related to the product of the Drosophilatumor suppressor gene dlg-A, J Biol Chem, 1993, 268, 4580–4583.
Kotake K, Ozaki N, Mizuta M, Sekiya S, Inagaki N & Seino S. Noc2, a putative zinc-finger protein involved in exocytosis in endocrine cells, J Biol Chem, 1997, 272, 29407–29410.
Kozak M. An analysis of 5'-noncoding sequences from 699 vertebrate messenger RNAs, Nucl Acids Res, 1987, 15, 8125–8148.
Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4, Nature, 1970, 227, 680–685.[Medline]
Landis DMD, Hall AK, Weinstein LA & Reese TS. The organization of cytoplasm at the presynaptic active zone of a central nervous system synapse, Neuron, 1988, 1, 201–209.[Medline]
Langnaese K, Beesley PW & Gundelfinger ED. Synaptic membrane glycoproteins gp65 and gp55 are new members of the immunoglobulin superfamily, J Biol Chem, 1997, 272, 821–827.
Langnaese K, Seidenbecher C, Wex H, Seidel B, Hartung K, Appeltauer U, Garner A, Voss B, Mueller B, Garner CC & Gundelfinger ED. Protein components of a rat brain synaptic junctional protein preparation, Mol Brain Res, 1996, 42, 118–122.[Medline]
Lichter, P., and T. Cremer. 1992. Chromosome analysis by non-isotopic in situ hybridization. In Human Cytogenetics: A Practical Approach. 2nd ed., Vol. 1. D.E. Rooney, and B.H. Czepulkowski, editors. IRL Press at Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom. 157–192.
Llinás, R.R., and K.D. Walton. 1990. Cerebellum. In The Synaptic Organization of the Brain. G.M. Shepherd, editor. Oxford University Press, New York.
Lupas A. Coiled coils: new structures and new functions, Trends Biochem Sci, 1996, 21, 375–382.[Medline]
Lupas A, Van Dyke M & Stock J. Predicting coiled coils from protein sequences, Science, 1991, 252, 1162–1164.
Müller BM, Kistner U, Veh RW, Cases-Langhoff C, Becker B, Gundelfinger ED & Garner CC. Molecular characterization and spatial distribution of SAP 97, a novel presynaptic protein homologous to SAP 90 and the Drosophiladiscs-large tumor suppressor protein, J Neurosci, 1995, 15, 2354–2366.[Abstract]
Müller BM, Kistner U, Kindler S, Chung WJ, Kuhlendahl S, Fenster SD, Lau LF, Veh RW, Huganir RL, Gundelfinger ED & Garner CC. SAP102, a novel postsynaptic protein that interacts with NMDA Receptor complexes in vivo, Neuron, 1996, 17, 255–265.[Medline]
Pieribone VA, Shupliakov O, Brodin L, Hilfiker-Rothenfluh S, Czernik AJ & Greengard P. Distinct pools of synaptic vesicles in neurotransmitter release, Nature, 1995, 375, 493–497.[Medline]
Reddy SP & Housman DE. The complex pathology of trinucleotide repeats, Curr Opin Cell Biol, 1997, 9, 364–372.[Medline]
Richter K, Hamprecht B & Scheich H. Ultrastructural localization of glycogen phosphorylase predominantly in astrocytes of the gerbil brain, Glia, 1996, 17, 263–273.[Medline]
Rosahl TW, Spillane D, Missler M, Herz J, Selig DK, Wolff JR, Hammer RE, Malenka RC & Südhof TC. Essential functions of synapsins I and II in synaptic vesicle regulation, Nature, 1995, 375, 488–493.[Medline]
Ross C. Intranuclear neuronal inclusions: a common pathogenic mechanism for glutamine-repeat neurodegenerative diseases? , Neuron, 1997, 19, 1147–1150.[Medline]
Sánchez-García I. The LIM domain: a new structural motif found in zinc-finger-like proteins, Trends Genet, 1994, 10, 315–320.[Medline]
Seidenbecher CI, Richter K, Rauch U, Fässler R, Garner CC & Gundelfinger ED. Brevican, a chondroitin sulfate proteoglycan of rat brain, occurs as secreted and cell surface glycosylphosphatidylinositol- anchored isoforms, J Biol Chem, 1995, 270, 27206–27212.
Shirataki H, Kaibuchi K, Sakoda T, Kishida S, Yamaguchi T, Wada K, Miyazaki M & Takai Y. Rabphilin-3A, a putative target protein for smg p25A/rab3A p25 small GTP-binding protein related to synaptotagmin, Mol Cell Biol, 1993, 13, 2061–2068.
Sikorski AF, Terlecki G, Zagon IS & Goodman SR. Synapsin I-mediated interaction of brain spectrin with synaptic vesicles, J Cell Biol, 1991, 114, 313–318.
Südhof TC. The synaptic vesicle cycle: a cascade of protein-protein interactions, Nature, 1995, 375, 645–653.[Medline]
Südhof TC. Function of Rab3 GDP-GTP exchange, Neuron, 1997, 18, 519–522.[Medline]
Takei Y, Harada A, Takeda S, Kobayashi K, Terada S, Noda T, Takahashi T & Hirokawa N. Synapsin I deficiency results in the structural change in the presynaptic terminals in the murine nervous system, J Cell Biol, 1995, 131, 1789–1800.
Thomas U, Phannavong B, Müller B, Garner CC & Gundelfinger ED. Functional expression of rat synapse-associated proteins SAP97 and SAP102 in Drosophiladlg-1 mutants: effects on tumor suppression and synaptic bouton structure, Mech Dev, 1997a, 62, 161–174.[Medline]
Thomas U, Kim E, Kuhlendahl S, Koh YH, Gundelfinger ED, Sheng M, Garner CC & Budnik V. Synaptic clustering of the cell adhesion molecule fasciclin II by discs- large and its role in the regulation of presynaptic structure, Neuron, 1997b, 19, 787–799.[Medline]
Wang Y, Okamoto M, Schmitz F, Hofmann K & Südhof TC. Rim is a putative Rab3 effector in regulating synaptic-vesicle fusion, Nature, 1997, 388, 593–598.[Medline]
Wiedenmann B & Franke WW. Identification and localization of synaptophysin, an integral membrane glycoprotein of Mr38.000 characteristic of presynaptic vesicles, Cell, 1985, 41, 1017–1028.[Medline]
Ziff EB. Enlightening the postsynaptic density, Neuron, 1997, 19, 1163–1174.[Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|