|
||
© The Rockefeller University Press,
0021-9525/1999//1323 $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 144, Number 6,
, 1999 1323-1336
Regular Articles |
PTPµ Regulates N-Cadherin–dependent Neurite Outgrowth
Cell adhesion is critical to the establishment of proper connections in the nervous system. Some receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs) have adhesion molecule–like extracellular segments with intracellular tyrosine phosphatase domains that may transduce signals in response to adhesion. PTPµ is a RPTP that mediates cell aggregation and is expressed at high levels in the nervous system. In this study, we demonstrate that PTPµ promotes neurite outgrowth of retinal ganglion cells when used as a culture substrate. In addition, PTPµ was found in a complex with N-cadherin in retinal cells. To determine the physiological significance of the association between PTPµ and N-cadherin, the expression level and enzymatic activity of PTPµ were perturbed in retinal explant cultures. Downregulation of PTPµ expression through antisense techniques resulted in a significant decrease in neurite outgrowth on an N-cadherin substrate, whereas there was no effect on laminin or L1-dependent neurite outgrowth. The overexpression of a catalytically inactive form of PTPµ significantly decreased neurite outgrowth on N-cadherin. These data indicate that PTPµ specifically regulates signals required for neurites to extend on an N-cadherin substrate, implicating reversible tyrosine phosphorylation in the control of N-cadherin function. Together, these results suggest that PTPµ plays a dual role in the regulation of neurite outgrowth.
Key Words: neurite outgrowth protein tyrosine phosphatase cadherin cell adhesion retina
Abbreviations used in this paper: CAM, cell adhesion molecule; GFP, green fluorescent protein; RGC, retinal ganglion cell; RPTP, receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase.
THE development of the nervous system is a complex process requiring the formation of a large number of specific connections by a variety of neuronal cell types and target tissues. Some of the factors that regulate axonal pathfinding include contact-mediated growth promoting or repulsive molecules, as well as diffusible attractant and repulsive factors (reviewed by Tessier-Lavigne and Goodman, 1996). Contact-dependent guidance is thought to be mediated by a series of adhesive events between the growth cone, the specialized region at the distal tip of a growing axon, and molecules expressed on other cells or in matrices that form the "substrate" for migration. Presumably, the growth cone responds to these cues by initiation of a local signal that ultimately regulates the direction of axonal extension. The role of adhesion molecules in contact-dependent guidance has been extensively studied, yet the signaling events involved in this process are not well understood. The present study investigates the role of a unique cell adhesion molecule, the receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase mu (PTPµ),1 in contact-dependent signaling and neurite outgrowth. PTPµ is expressed in several regions of the central nervous system during development and is capable of mediating adhesion, which suggests it could be one of the adhesion molecules that plays a role in neurite outgrowth.
Due to the complexity of the developing nervous system, many studies, including the one described here, have used in vitro model systems to gain a better understanding of the mechanisms that regulate axonal growth. A number of nervous system–derived cell surface proteins have been isolated, but only a subset of these have been shown to promote neurite outgrowth when used as a substrate in vitro. These proteins are subdivided into three major classes: the integrins and their ligands the extracellular matrix molecules (ECM), cadherins, and the immunoglobulin superfamily of cell adhesion molecules (CAMs). Neuronal cells express several integrin receptors and will extend neurites on a subset of ECM molecules including laminin, vitronectin, thrombospondin, janusin, and tenascin (Reichardt et al., 1990; Neugebauer et al., 1991; Reichardt and Tomaselli, 1991; Lochter and Schachner, 1993; Culp et al., 1997). The cadherins are calcium-dependent adhesion molecules and only N- and R-cadherin have been shown to promote neurite outgrowth (Bixby and Zhang, 1990; Redies and Takeichi, 1993). In addition, some Ig superfamily molecules mediate cell–cell adhesion and have also been shown to promote neurite outgrowth (Brummendorf and Rathjen, 1993; Burden-Gulley and Lemmon, 1995). L1 and NCAM are two examples of Ig superfamily CAMs that are abundantly expressed in the developing and adult nervous systems, and are capable of promoting neurite outgrowth (reviewed in Burden-Gulley and Lemmon, 1995; Brummendorf and Rathjen, 1998).
A number of receptor protein tyrosine phosphatases (RPTPs) resemble Ig superfamily CAMs such as NCAM, and appear to directly mediate adhesion or associate with other adhesion molecules (reviewed in Brady-Kalnay and Tonks, 1995; Streuli, 1996; Neel and Tonks, 1997; Brady-Kalnay, 1998). The coupling of CAM-like extracellular domains and phosphatase enzymatic activity within one molecule suggests that changes in the adhesive state of the phosphatase could potentially alter enzymatic activity. One such RPTP, PTPµ, is characterized by an extracellular segment that contains one MAM domain (meprins, A5, mu), one Ig domain, and four fibronectin type III repeats (Gebbink et al., 1991). Expression of PTPµ induced the aggregation of nonadhesive cells (Brady-Kalnay et al., 1993; Gebbink et al., 1993), and both the MAM domain (Zondag et al., 1995) and the Ig domain (Brady-Kalnay and Tonks, 1994a) have been shown to play a role in PTPµ-mediated cell–cell adhesion. Together, these studies demonstrated that the binding is homophilic (i.e., the "ligand" for PTPµ is an identical PTPµ molecule on an adjacent cell).
The juxtamembrane domain of PTPµ has 20% amino acid identity to the conserved intracellular domain of the cadherins (Brady-Kalnay and Tonks, 1994b). The cytoplasmic segment of cadherins binds to catenins that link this complex to the actin cytoskeleton (Gumbiner, 1995; Aberle et al., 1996). Previously, we showed that PTPµ associates with the cadherin/catenin complex (Brady-Kalnay et al., 1995; Hiscox and Jiang, 1998), specifically with N-, E-, and R-cadherins (also called cadherin-4; Brady-Kalnay et al., 1998). In addition, the intracellular segment of PTPµ was demonstrated to bind directly to the intracellular domain of E-cadherin (Brady-Kalnay et al., 1995), and the COOH-terminal 38 amino acids of E-cadherin were required for this interaction (Brady-Kalnay et al., 1998). However, a role for PTPµ in the regulation of cadherin function has not yet been shown.
The PTPµ protein is abundant in many parts of the central nervous system (Gebbink et al., 1991; Brady-Kalnay et al., 1995; Sommer et al., 1997; Brady-Kalnay, 1998) and is developmentally regulated in the retina. The retina is one of the best characterized and experimentally tractable systems for studying both cell–cell adhesion and development. The retina is comprised of a number of different cell types, and the molecular interactions of multiple CAMs are known to regulate retinal histogenesis and axonal pathfinding (Silver and Rutishauser, 1984; Matsunaga et al., 1988a,b; Brittis et al., 1995; Brittis and Silver, 1995). In the retina, PTPµ is primarily expressed on retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) whose sole function is to communicate via their neuronal processes with the brain. RGC axons migrate along the surfaces of neuronal and glial cells in the brain during development, thus using the CAMs on the surfaces of these cells as a substrate for neuronal migration.
Due to the homophilic binding nature of PTPµ, its developmental pattern of expression in the retina, and interaction with cadherins in other tissues, we tested the hypothesis that PTPµ regulates neurite outgrowth. In this report, we used an in vitro retina explant model system to study neurite outgrowth. We provide evidence that PTPµ is capable of promoting neurite outgrowth and cell migration when used as a culture substrate. The neurite outgrowth activity was specific to PTPµ since antibodies against PTPµ completely inhibited outgrowth on a PTPµ substrate. In addition, PTPµ was found in a complex with N-cadherin in retinal tissues and RGC neurites. To determine the physiological significance of an association between PTPµ and N-cadherin, the expression level and enzymatic activity of PTPµ were perturbed in retinal explants. Downregulation of PTPµ expression through antisense techniques resulted in a significant decrease in neurite outgrowth on an N-cadherin substrate, whereas there was no effect on laminin or L1-dependent neurite outgrowth. The overexpression of a catalytically inactive form of PTPµ significantly decreased neurite outgrowth on N-cadherin, thus illustrating the importance of the enzymatic activity of the PTPµ phosphatase in this process. These data indicate that PTPµ specifically regulates signals required for neurites to extend on an N-cadherin substrate, implicating reversible tyrosine phosphorylation in the control of N-cadherin function. Together, these results suggest that PTPµ plays a dual role in the regulation of neurite outgrowth during retinal development.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Purification of PTPµ from Brain
Adult rat brains were minced and homogenized (Bellco Biotechnology) in a solution of 0.32 M sucrose in 50 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl (TBS), pH 8.0, containing protease inhibitors 5 mM EDTA, 10 µg/ml turkey trypsin inhibitor, 2 mM benzamidine hydrochloride, and 200 µM phenylmethylsulfonylfluoride. The homogenate was layered onto a 0.8 M, 1.2 M sucrose gradient and centrifuged at 25,000 rpm for 45 min (SW28 rotor; Beckman Instruments, Inc.). The membrane layer was diluted with TBS and respun at 50,000 rpm for 30 min (Ti 70.1 rotor; Beckman Instruments, Inc.). The pellet was then extracted with 1% sodium deoxycholate in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. The membrane extract was respun at 50,000 rpm for 30 min and the supernatant was incubated overnight at 4°C with CNBr Sepharose 4B beads (Pharmacia LKB Biotechnology) that had been covalently coupled with the SK15 PTPµ antibody. The beads were washed extensively with 50 mM Tris-HCl containing 0.5% sodium deoxycholate and 0.5% NP-40, pH 8.0, followed by 10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. The protein was eluted from the column with 0.1 M diethylamine, pH 11.5, and neutralized with 2 M Tris-HCl, pH 3.6. For SDS-PAGE, sample buffer (4% SDS, 20% glycerol, 0.2 M dithiothreitol, bromphenol blue, 0.12 M Tris, pH 6.8) was added and boiled for 5 min at 95°C. L1 and N-cadherin were purified from chick brains using previously described procedures (Lemmon et al., 1989; Bixby and Zhang, 1990).
Protein purity was checked by two different methods. First, the eluted protein fractions were separated by 4–15% SDS-PAGE (gradient Tris-HCl gels; Bio-Rad Laboratories) and the gel was silver stained. In a second procedure, the eluted fractions were immunoblotted as previously described (Brady-Kalnay et al., 1995).
Dish Preparation and Culture of Retinal Explants and Dissociated Cells
35-mm tissue culture dishes (Falcon Labware) were coated with nitrocellulose in methanol (Lagenaur and Lemmon, 1987) and allowed to dry. A small amount of protein (2–4 µg) was spread across the center of the dishes, and they were incubated 30 min at room temperature. Remaining binding sites on the nitrocellulose were blocked with 2% BSA in PBS, and the dishes were rinsed with RPMI-1640 medium.
Retinal explant cultures were made according to a previously described procedure (Halfter et al., 1983; Drazba and Lemmon, 1990). In brief, embryonic day 8 (stage 32.5–33 according to Hamburger and Hamilton, 1951) White Leghorn chick eyes were dissected and the retina was flattened with the photoreceptor side down onto black nitrocellulose filters (0.45-µm pore size; Vanguard International, Inc.) that had previously been incubated in 0.05% concanavalin A to enhance attachment of the retina to the filter. The filter was then cut into 350-µm wide strips perpendicular to the optic fissure using a McIlwain tissue chopper. Strips were inverted onto substrate-coated culture dishes so that the ganglion cell layer was directly adjacent to the substratum. Cells were cultured in RPMI-1640 medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum/2% chick serum/penicillin-streptomycin-fungizone and incubated at 37°C in 95% air/5% CO2.
Neurite outgrowth on PTPµ, N-cadherin, and L1 substrates was inhibited by the addition of culture supernatant from the BK2 (anti–PTPµ), NCD2 (anti–N-cadherin), and 8D9 (anti–L1) hybridoma cells, respectively, into the medium at the time of plating retinal explants as described above. The medium was supplemented with fetal bovine serum and chick serum to maintain equivalent levels of growth factors to controls. Neurite outgrowth was examined at 24, 48, and 72 h after plating.
Dissociated retina cultures were prepared from E6 embryos using the procedure above, except that the retinas were incubated in 0.25% trypsin and 0.1% EDTA (Mediatech Cellgro) for 20 min at 37°C. The retinas were dissociated by trituration and resuspended in RPMI-1640/10% tryptose phosphate broth/4% fetal bovine serum/1% chick serum/gentamycin, and then cultured in 12-well plates (Falcon Labware). E6 retinas were used because a large percentage of the cells are still mitotic at this age, which is an important requirement for retroviral-mediated gene transfer. Expression of the exogenous gene was repressed by culturing infected cells in the presence of 3 µg/ml tetracycline (see below).
Immunolabeling of Retina Sections and Cultured Explants
For immunohistochemical labeling of retina sections, eyes from E8 chicks were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, 0.01% glutaraldehyde in PEM buffer (80 mM Pipes, 5 mM EGTA, 1 mM MgCl2, 3% sucrose), pH 7.4. The tissue was rinsed and cryoprotected with 20% sucrose in PBS and frozen in OCT medium (EM Sciences). Cryostat sections were cut at 7-µm intervals, adhered to gelatin coated slides, and stored at –20°C. Sections were permeabilized and blocked with 1% Triton, 20% goat serum in PBS, and then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies diluted into block buffer (20% goat serum, 1% BSA, 0.5% saponin in PBS). After extensive rinsing, sections were incubated with fluorescein-conjugated secondary antibodies, rinsed extensively with PBS, and then coverslipped with IFF mounting medium (0.5 M Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, containing 20% glycerol and 1 mg/ml p-phenylenediamine). Immunolabeled sections were examined using a 40x objective on an Axiophot microscope (Carl Zeiss, Inc.), and images captured using a Hamamatsu-cooled CCD camera.
For immunocytochemical labeling of retinal explant cultures, the cultures were fixed as above, and then rinsed with PBS and incubated with block buffer. Cultures were incubated with primary antibodies in block buffer overnight at 4°C. After rinsing with PBS, the cultures were blocked with TNB reagent (supplied in TSA-direct kit; NEN Life Science Products) for 30 min, and then incubated with fluorophore or HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies diluted in TNB for 1 h at room temperature. After extensive rinsing with TNT buffer (0.1 M Tris, 0.15 M NaCl, 0.05% Tween-20), the cells were incubated with the tyramide-FITC reagent in 1x amplification diluent for 10 min to deposit FITC onto the HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies. After TNT rinses, the cultures were coverslipped with IFF mounting medium and examined using a 40x objective on a microscope (405M; Carl Zeiss, Inc.).
Antibody cross-linking ("patching") experiments were done by incubating live retinal cultures with a polyclonal antibody against the extracellular domain of PTPµ (494) for 40 min at 37°C. The cultures were then rinsed, fixed, and permeabilized as above. The cells were processed for immunocytochemistry as above using a monoclonal antibody against N-cadherin (NCD2) or NCAM (5e) and the appropriate secondary antibodies. The double-labeled samples were examined using a 100x Neofluar objective (1.3 numerical aperture) on a confocal microscope (LSM-410; Carl Zeiss, Inc.).
Immunoprecipitations
Antibodies were covalently coupled to CNBr Sepharose 4B (Pharmacia LKB Biotechnology) using the manufacturer's protocol, or Protein A beads using a previously described protocol (Brady-Kalnay et al., 1995). E8 retinas were homogenized with a tissue tearor (200; PRO Scientific Inc.) in lysis buffer (1% Triton, 20 mM Tris, pH 7.6, 2 mM CaCl2, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM benzamidine hydrochloride, 5 µg/ml aprotinin, 5 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 0.1 mM ammonium molybdate, 0.2 mM phenyl arsine oxide), and incubated on ice for 45 min. Triton-insoluble material was removed by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm, and the lysate was incubated with antibody-coupled beads overnight at 4°C. The beads were washed extensively with lysis buffer, and then boiled in sample buffer and separated by 6% SDS-PAGE. Proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membrane and immunoblotted as described (Brady-Kalnay et al., 1995).
Construction and Expression of the PTPµ Retroviruses
The retroviral system used is a tetracycline-repressible promoter-based ("tet-off") system (Paulus et al., 1996). Using the pBPSTR1 vector generously provided by Dr. Steven Reeves (Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA), the following constructs were generated: antisense PTPµ, sense PTPµ, and a c
s mutant form of PTPµ. A PTPµ antisense plasmid was generated that contained PTPµ coding sequence (base pairs 2449– 4358) in the opposite orientation to the promoter. The sense plasmid contained almost the entire coding sequence of PTPµ (base pairs 1–4350; i.e., it only lacked the last two amino acids and the stop codon). This was done to create an in-frame fusion with the green fluorescence protein (GFP) at the COOH terminus that we call PTPµGFP. This plasmid was generated by digesting full length PTPµ in bluescript (Brady-Kalnay et al., 1993) and ligating it into pEGFP-N3 from Clonetech. The mutant form of PTPµ containing the cysteine-to-serine mutation at residue 1095 was generated by PCR, and a BglII/BspE1 fragment was subcloned to replace that same fragment in the wild-type form of PTPµ in the vector PTPµ/pEGFP-N3. The resulting plasmid, c
s mutant PTPµGFP, was sequenced to confirm that the single amino acid mutation was present. The c
s mutation renders the phosphatase catalytically inactive (Barford et al., 1994). The pEGFP plasmids containing either wild-type or mutant PTPµ were subcloned into the tetracycline-regulatable retroviral vector, pBPSTR1. A replication-defective amphotrophic retrovirus was made by transfecting the PA317 helper cell line (CRL-9078; American Type Culture Collection) with the respective PTPµ-containing plasmids. Control virus was generated by transfecting PA317 helper cells with the pBPSTR1 plasmid alone. The virus was added to cells in the presence or absence of 3 µg/ml tetracycline. When tetracycline was added, expression of the viral gene was inhibited. Reduction in endogenous PTPµ expression was verified by immunoblotting lysates from infected cells with antibodies to PTPµ. The density of the bands on the immunoblot films was measured using the MetaMorph image analysis program (Universal Imaging Corp.).
Infection of Retinal Explants with Retrovirus
Retroviral-mediated gene transfer requires that the infected cells are still mitotic in order to incorporate and express the retroviral gene. RGC neurons begin to drop out of cell division at E2–3 at a region just dorsotemporal to the optic fissure, and the wave of maturation continues outward from this region in a spatiotemporal fashion (Halfter et al., 1983; Prada et al., 1991). To infect the greatest number of cells for these experiments, retinas from viral-free E3.5–4 chicks (stage 20–23) (Spafas Inc.) were used. At this age, robust neurite outgrowth occurred on N-cadherin, laminin, and L1 substrates, but not on PTPµ. Therefore, PTPµ could not be used as a test substrate for these experiments. The dissection and plating procedure is as described above except that the retinas were cut at 250-µm intervals. Explant strips from each retina were laid in alternating fashion onto two similar substrate-coated dishes, with four explants per dish, then 28 µg of polybrene and 1 ml of virus-containing medium were added for a 6–18-h incubation at 37°C. After incubation in virus, the medium was exchanged with normal culture medium. Cultures were examined at
24 and 48 h after plating, and neurite outgrowth from each explant was photographed.
Quantitation of Neurite Outgrowth
To quantify the neurite outgrowth, the 35-mm negatives were scanned and the digitized images were analyzed using the MetaMorph image analysis program. Lengths of the five longest neurites per explant were measured perpendicular to the explant tissue. To measure the number of neurites per explant, the region of neurite outgrowth was outlined to define the region of interest, the neurites were highlighted using the threshold function, and the total number of highlighted pixels per region of interest was calculated. This method provided a means to compare density between control and test conditions on each substrate. The neurite length and density measurements were analyzed by Fisher's PLSD, Scheffe, and Student's t test (Statview 4.51; Abacus Concepts, Inc.), and similar results were obtained with each of these tests for each experiment. The data from all like experiments were combined and plotted (Cricketgraph III; Computer Associates International, Inc.).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
200 kD, and two fragments of
105 kD (predominantly extracellular form) and 100 kD (the intracellular domain, transmembrane region, and a short stretch of the extracellular domain) were observed (Fig. 2 A, arrows). These fragments have been shown to be due to normal proteolytic processing of the protein into noncovalently associated extracellular and intracellular fragments, respectively (Brady-Kalnay and Tonks, 1994a). The eluted PTPµ protein was examined by immunoblotting to confirm that the preparation was not contaminated by other CAMs that promote neurite outgrowth (Fig. 2 B). The samples included purified proteins from brain: PTPµ (two different preparations), N-cadherin, NCAM, and L1. N-cadherin, NCAM, and L1 were detected in the appropriate purified protein lanes, but were absent from the PTPµ preparations. PTPµ was only detected in the PTPµ preparations. These results clearly show that the PTPµ purified using these stringent conditions was not contaminated with N-cadherin, L1, or NCAM, three CAMs that are highly expressed in brain and have been previously demonstrated to promote neurite outgrowth (Rutishauser, 1983; Lagenaur and Lemmon, 1987; Bixby and Zhang, 1990).
|
|
|
|
|
To examine whether PTPµ associates with N-cadherin, the major cadherin in retina, immunoprecipitation experiments were done using E8 retina lysates. Similar results were obtained using E4 retinas (data not shown). Both the full-length (200 kD) and cleaved (100 kD) forms of PTPµ were immunoprecipitated by antibodies to PTPµ (Fig. 6 B, lanes 2 and 3), but not by mouse IgG (Fig. 6 B, lane 1). When immunoprecipitates of PTPµ were probed on immunoblots with antipancadherin antibodies, an association with N-cadherin was detected (Fig. 6 D, lanes 2 and 3). In the reciprocal experiment, N-cadherin was immunoprecipitated by antibodies to N-cadherin (Fig. 6 D, lane 4), but was not detected when mouse IgG was used for immunoprecipitation (lane 1). N-cadherin immunoprecipitates contained the 200-kD full-length form of PTPµ (Fig. 6 B, lane 4), and the 100-kD fragment of PTPµ that was also present in the PTPµ immunoprecipitates (lanes 2 and 3).
The results from the immunoprecipitation experiments indicated that PTPµ associates with N-cadherin. Since PTPµ is expressed at high levels within RGC neurons, it is likely that an association with N-cadherin occurs within these cells. To verify that PTPµ interacts with cadherins in RGC neurons, an antibody cross-linking experiment was performed using neurites from E8 chick retinal explants growing on the control substrate laminin. In Fig. 7, A–B and E–F, the cells were fixed and processed for immunocytochemistry using the 494 polyclonal antibody against PTPµ (A and E) and a monoclonal antibody against either N-cadherin (B) or NCAM (F). In the absence of PTPµ cross-linking, N-cadherin, NCAM, and PTPµ were present in a continuous fashion along the length of the axons and growth cones. For the cross-linking experiments, the explants were cultured for 24 h to allow significant RGC neurite outgrowth, and the live cultures were incubated with a polyclonal antibody against the extracellular domain of PTPµ (494) to permit clustering of PTPµ protein on the cell surface (patching; Fig. 7, C and G). The cells were then fixed and processed for immunocytochemistry with antibodies to N-cadherin (Fig. 7 D) or NCAM (H). The PTPµ protein was cross-linked into patches along the neurites (Fig. 7, C and G). Importantly, N-cadherin protein also became concentrated into the PTPµ patch sites (Fig. 7 D). Extensive colocalization was observed between PTPµ and N-cadherin, suggesting a stoichiometric association between these proteins in neurites. In contrast, another abundantly expressed cell adhesion molecule, NCAM, did not become concentrated into PTPµ patch sites (Fig. 7 H). The results of these experiments show that PTPµ and N-cadherin associate in the RGC neurites, and provide a basis for examination of the function of that association in neurite outgrowth.
|
|
50% reduction in PTPµ expression in the neurites when they are immunolabeled with antibodies to PTPµ (data not shown). Therefore, there is a substantial reduction in the PTPµ phosphatase overall, but some residual expression of PTPµ in all of the neurites in the explant population. The photograph shown (Fig. 9, C–D) is representative of the median level of neurite outgrowth. Quantitation of all of the results indicated that neurite lengths were reduced by 53% and overall neurite density was reduced by 74% in cultures expressing PTPµ antisense in comparison with cells expressing control virus. In contrast, PTPµ antisense had no effect on either length or density of neurites growing on the control substrates laminin (Figs. 9, A–B, and 10, A–B), or L1 (Figs. 9, E–F, and 10, A–B; Table I). Since the length and density of outgrowth on laminin and L1 in the presence of PTPµ antisense virus was similar to that observed previously (Lemmon et al., 1992), it seems unlikely that the PTPµ antisense virus altered RGC differentiation. In addition, no difference in the level of axon fasciculation was observed in cultures infected with control versus PTPµ antisense virus on any substrate examined. More importantly, the ability of neurons to extend neurites on other substrates suggests that the PTPµ antisense virus was not toxic for the neurons themselves and did not have nonspecific effects on neurite outgrowth in general. These results suggest that PTPµ is specifically involved in regulating N-cadherin–mediated neurite outgrowth.
|
|
|
s mutant, which encoded the full-length PTPµ protein tagged at the COOH terminus with GFP, preserved the adhesive function of the extracellular segment but rendered the phosphatase catalytically inactive. E4 retinas were infected with a retrovirus encoding the c
s mutant form of PTPµ, and cultured on an N-cadherin substrate. Explants infected with the c
s mutant virus displayed a dramatic and significant decrease (
50%) in neurite outgrowth on N-cadherin in comparison with sister explants infected with control virus (Fig. 10, C–D; Table I). These results were similar to those obtained in cultures infected with PTPµ antisense virus (Fig. 10, A–B; Table I). Overexpression of full-length PTPµ coupled to GFP did not alter neurite outgrowth on N-cadherin (Fig. 10, C–D; Table I). These results indicate that PTPµ tyrosine phosphatase activity is a key regulatory component for proper N-cadherin function. | Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Axonal pathfinding, fasciculation, target recognition, and synapse formation are all processes that require contact-mediated recognition of cell surface cues. The diversity of the CAMs and other molecules involved in axonal pathfinding reflects the staggering array of decisions an individual axon must make along the way to its target. Many of the guidance molecules are members of the immunoglobulin superfamily. These include CAMs like L1 and NCAM, tyrosine kinases such as Eph family members and FGF receptors and even some RPTPs; for example, DLAR, DPTP69D, and now PTPµ. Presumably, these molecules mediate specific recognition events at different points during axonal outgrowth and pathfinding. CAMs are not solely involved in adhesion of neurons to one another; they also participate in signal transduction. The interaction of a growth cone with a particular CAM can lead to rapid and specific changes in growth cone morphology (Burden-Gulley et al., 1995). This implies the adhesion molecules are sending signals that result in a transient change in the underlying cytoskeleton (Burden-Gulley and Lemmon, 1996) that guide a neuron toward its target (Lin and Forscher, 1993; Bentley and O'Connor, 1994).
RPTPs Are Involved in Axonal Guidance
Previous inhibitor studies suggested that tyrosine phosphatases are involved in the control of neurite outgrowth in general and on CAM substrates (Bixby and Jhabvala, 1992; Beggs et al., 1994; Ignelzi et al., 1994). Recent studies suggest that regulation of tyrosine phosphorylation by RPTPs affects axonal growth possibly by "steering" growth cones along the appropriate pathway (Desai et al., 1997). In Drosophila, two CAM-like RPTPs are expressed in the central nervous system, and knockout experiments have demonstrated that they play critical roles in development. Mutant embryos for the Drosophila RPTPs, DLAR and DPTP69D, display an inability of specific motorneurons to recognize guidance cues that allow them to innervate appropriate target muscles (Desai et al., 1996; Krueger et al., 1996). In addition, a LAR homologue in leech was shown to accumulate in a subset of axonal growth cones and play a guidance role during outgrowth of these axonal processes (Gershon et al., 1998). Together with the present study, these data provide the first evidence that RPTPs could be directly involved in axonal pathfinding and suggest that tyrosine phosphorylation is a key regulator of axonal guidance and choice point recognition.
In the present study, we demonstrated that PTPµ plays a role in neurite outgrowth at physiological levels of protein expression. This data is important because previous studies on the ability of PTPµ to mediate aggregation were performed when PTPµ was massively overexpressed (Brady-Kalnay et al., 1993). We have now demonstrated that PTPµ promotes neurite outgrowth from RGC neurons, presumably through a homophilic binding mechanism. PTPµ may have several important roles in nervous system development. First, it may act as a cell–cell adhesion molecule necessary for maintenance of nervous system integrity. This could occur through homophilic binding of PTPµ on the surfaces of two apposing axons to promote axon fasciculation, a process required for nerve formation. A similar role has been suggested for other CAMs such as L1 (Lemmon et al., 1989; Tang et al., 1992) and NCAM (Rutishauser et al., 1978). Second, PTPµ may act as a permissive molecule for axonal growth. The expression of PTPµ by axons, astrocytes (our unpublished data) and other nonneuronal cells makes this role a likely possibility. A contact attraction role for PTPµ is a third possibility, such that PTPµ actively guides axons during pathfinding. For example, PTPµ may be expressed at specific choice points where axons must choose the appropriate pathway. RGC growth cones encounter several choice points during outgrowth to their target, the optic tectum (Tessier-Lavigne, 1995). The mechanisms regulating this stereotypical innervation pattern are only partly understood, but involve tyrosine phosphorylation (Cox et al., 1990; Drescher et al., 1997). A fourth possible function of PTPµ is as a sensor molecule. For example, changes in the adhesive state of the extracellular environment may be transmitted through PTPµ via regulation of its catalytic domain. PTPµ may then directly regulate the phosphorylation state of a number of cytosolic proteins, including components of the cadherin/catenin complex. This idea is supported by the inhibition of N-cadherin–mediated neurite outgrowth when RGC neurons overexpress a catalytically inactive form of PTPµ.
Cadherins Are Regulated by Tyrosine Phosphorylation
A likely target of the PTPµ enzyme is a component of the N-cadherin complex, which was previously postulated to be a substrate of PTPµ (Brady-Kalnay et al., 1995, 1998). The association of cadherins and catenins with receptor and nontransmembrane PTPs has now been observed by many groups (Brady-Kalnay et al., 1995; Balsamo et al., 1996, 1998; Fuchs et al., 1996; Kypta et al., 1996; Aicher et al., 1997; Cheng et al., 1997; Brady-Kalnay et al., 1998; Hiscox and Jiang, 1998). The juxtamembrane domains of PTP
(Fuchs et al., 1996) and PCP2 (Cheng et al., 1997) interact with β catenin. A LAR-like RPTP associates with the cadherin/catenin complex in PC12 cells (Kypta et al., 1996) and the intracellular domain of LAR was shown to bind directly to β catenin and plakoglobin in vitro (Aicher et al., 1997). The PTP1B cytoplasmic phosphatase was shown to interact with the N-cadherin/catenin complex and dephosphorylate β catenin (Balsamo et al., 1996), a process required for N-cadherin–mediated adhesion and actin linkage (Balsamo et al., 1998). Therefore, it is likely that regulation of the cadherin/catenin complex by PTPs will be an important mechanism of control in many cell types, including neurons.
Tyrosine phosphorylation of the cadherin/catenin complex correlates with suppression of cadherin-mediated adhesion (Matsuyoshi et al., 1992; Behrens et al., 1993; Hamaguchi et al., 1993), adherens junction disassembly/ loss of cytoskeletal association (Warren and Nelson, 1987; Volberg et al., 1991, 1992), invasion and malignant progression (Kemler, 1993; Birchmeier, 1995). Tyrosine phosphorylation of the cadherin/catenin complex can be catalyzed by pp60src, EGF receptor, c-erbB2, or hepatocyte growth factor receptor (Tsukita et al., 1991; Hoschuetzky et al., 1994; Ochiai et al., 1994; Shibamoto et al., 1994). These data indicate that one of the mechanisms the cell uses to regulate the function of the cadherin/catenin complex is tyrosine phosphorylation. In the present study, PTPµ associated with N-cadherin in lysates from retina as demonstrated by immunoprecipitation techniques. A similar association was demonstrated in RGC neurites through antibody cross-linking and immunocytochemistry techniques. In addition, the ability of neurites to migrate on N-cadherin was significantly impaired when PTPµ expression was downregulated. These results provide evidence that N-cadherin–mediated neurite outgrowth requires functional PTPµ. The inhibition of N-cadherin–mediated neurite outgrowth due to overexpression of the catalytically inactive form of PTPµ further supports the idea that cadherins or their associated proteins need to be dephosphorylated to function in adhesion (Brady-Kalnay et al., 1995, 1998). Therefore, PTPµ tyrosine phosphatase activity is a key regulatory component of the N-cadherin/catenin complex. In contrast, PTPµ downregulation did not alter neurite outgrowth on L1 or laminin control substrates. These results suggest that the effects of PTPµ downregulation were specific to N-cadherin–mediated neurite outgrowth and not due to general alterations in cellular phosphotyrosine that could nonspecifically affect neurite outgrowth.
Perspectives on the Developmental Role of PTPµ in the Retinotectal System
Our data demonstrate that PTPµ can promote neurite outgrowth, which is consistent with a role for PTPµ in neuronal pathfinding. This promotion of neurite outgrowth could be mimicking the ability of certain neurons to respond to signaling events initiated by PTPµ. The inability of PTPµ to promote neurite outgrowth from retinas earlier than E6 suggests that a threshold level of PTPµ expression on axons may be required for PTPµ to independently promote neurite outgrowth through a homophilic mechanism. At earlier ages, PTPµ may play other specific roles; for example, regulation of N-cadherin–dependent adhesion that is required for morphogenetic movements or axonal pathfinding events. N-cadherin is one of the key molecules involved in many aspects of retinal function from histogenesis and lamination to neurite outgrowth and synapse formation (Matsunaga et al., 1988; Redies and Takeichi, 1993; Fannon and Colman, 1996). PTPµ may regulate N-cadherin function by modulating signals that allow neurons to respond to N-cadherin–mediated adhesion.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
Submitted: 15 June 1998
Revised: 3 February 1999
Address correspondence to Susann Brady-Kalnay, Department of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH 44106-4960. Tel.: (216) 368-0330. Fax: (216) 368-3055. E-mail: smb4{at}po.cwru.edu
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Aberle H, Schwartz H & Kemler R. Cadherin–catenin complex: protein interactions and their implications for cadherin function, J Cell Biochem, 1996, 61, 514–523.[Medline]
Aicher B, Lerch MM, Muller T, Schilling J & Ulrich A. Cellular redistribution of protein tyrosine phosphatases LAR and PTP
by inducible proteolytic processing, J Cell Biol, 1997, 138, 681–696.
Balsamo J, Leung TC, Ernst H, Zanin MKB, Hoffman S & Lilien J. Regulated binding of a PTP1B-like phosphatase to N-cadherin: control of cadherin-mediated adhesion by dephosphorylation of β catenin, J Cell Biol, 1996, 134, 801–813.
Balsamo J, Arregui C, Leung TC & Lilien J. The nonreceptor protein tyrosine phosphatase PTP1B binds to the cytoplasmic domain of N-cadherin and regulates the cadherin–actin linkage, J Cell Biol, 1998, 143, 523–532.
Barford D, Flint AJ & Tonks NK. Crystal structure of human protein tyrosine phosphatase 1B, Science, 1994, 263, 1397–1404.
Beggs HE, Soriano P & Maness PF. N-CAM-dependent neurite outgrowth is inhibited in neurons from fyn-minus mice, J Cell Biol, 1994, 127, 825–833.
Behrens J, Vakaet L, Friis R, Winterhager E, Van Roy F, Mareel M & Birchmeier W. Loss of epithelial differentiation and gain of invasiveness correlates with tyrosine phosphorylation of the E-cadherin/β catenin complex in cells transformed with a temperature-sensitive v-src gene, J Cell Biol, 1993, 120, 757–766.
Bentley D & O'Connor TP. Cytoskeletal events in growth cone steering, Curr Opin Neurobiol, 1994, 4, 43–48.[Medline]
Birchmeier W. E-cadherin as a tumor (invasion) suppressor gene, Bioessays, 1995, 17, 97–99.[Medline]
Bixby JL & Jhabvala P. Inhibition of tyrosine phosphorylation potentiates substrate-induced neurite growth, J Neurobiol, 1992, 23, 468–480.[Medline]
Bixby JL & Zhang R. Purified N-cadherin is a potent substrate for the rapid induction of neurite outgrowth, J Cell Biol, 1990, 110, 1253–1260.
Brady-Kalnay S, Flint AJ & Tonks NK. Homophilic binding of PTPµ, a receptor-type protein tyrosine phosphatase, can mediate cell–cell aggregation, J Cell Biol, 1993, 122, 961–972.
Brady-Kalnay S & Tonks NK. Identification of the homophilic binding site of the receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase PTPµ, J Biol Chem, 1994a, 269, 28472–28477.
Brady-Kalnay SM & Tonks NK. Protein tyrosine phosphatases: from structure to function, Trends Cell Biol, 1994b, 4, 73–76.[Medline]
Brady-Kalnay SM, Rimm DL & Tonks NK. The receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase PTPµ associates with cadherins and catenins in vivo. , J Cell Biol, 1995, 130, 977–986.
Brady-Kalnay SM & Tonks NK. Protein tyrosine phosphatases as adhesion receptors, Curr Opin Cell Biol, 1995, 7, 650–657.[Medline]
Brady-Kalnay SM, Mourton T, Nixon JP, Pietz GE, Kinch M, Chen H, Brackenbury R, Rimm DL, Del Vecchio RL & Tonks NK. Dynamic interaction of PTPµ with multiple cadherins in vivo, J Cell Biol, 1998, 141, 287–296.
Brady-Kalnay, S. 1998. Ig superfamily phosphatases. In Ig Superfamily Molecules in the Nervous System. Vol. 6. P. Sonderegger, editor. Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 133–159.
Brittis PA, Lemmon V, Rutishauser U & Silver J. Unique changes of ganglion cell growth cone behavior following cell adhesion molecule perturbations: a time-lapse study of the living retina, Mol Cell Neurosci, 1995, 6, 433–449.[Medline]
Brittis PA & Silver J. Multiple factors govern intraretinal axon guidance: a time-lapse study, Mol Cell Neurosci, 1995, 6, 413–432.[Medline]
Brummendorf T & Rathjen FG. Axonal glycoproteins with immunoglobulin- and fibronectin type III–related domains in vertebrates: structural features, binding activities, and signal transduction, J Neurochem, 1993, 61, 1207–1219.[Medline]
Brummendorf, T., and F. Rathjen. 1998. Molecular interactions involving immunoglobulin superfamily adhesion proteins. In Ig Superfamily Molecules in the Nervous System. Vol. 6. P. Sonderegger, editor. Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, Netherlands. 23–56.
Burden-Gulley SM & Lemmon V. Ig superfamily adhesion molecules in the vertebrate nervous system; binding partners and signal transduction during axon growth, Semin Dev Biol, 1995, 6, 79–87.
Burden-Gulley SM & Lemmon V. L1, N-cadherin and laminin induce distinct distribution patterns of cytoskeletal elements in growth cones, Cell Motil Cytoskelet, 1996, 35, 1–23.[Medline]
Burden-Gulley SM, Payne HR & Lemmon V. Growth cones are actively influenced by substrate-bound adhesion molecules, J Neurosci, 1995, 15, 4370–4381.[Abstract]
Cheng J, Wu K, Armanini M, O'Rourke N, Dowbenko D & Lasky LA. A novel protein-tyrosine phosphatase related to the homotypically adhering
and µ receptors, J Biol Chem, 1997, 272, 7264–7277.
Cox EC, Muller B & Bonhoeffer F. Axonal guidance in the chick visual system: posterior tectal membranes induce collapse of growth cones from the temporal retina, Neuron, 1990, 4, 31–37.[Medline]
Culp, L.A., K.L. O'Connor, and R. Lechner. 1997. Extracellular matrix adhesion: biological, molecular and pathogenic mechanisms. In Principles of Medical Biology. Vol. 7B. JAI Press Inc., Greenwich, CT. 573–607.
Desai C, Gindhart JG, Goldstein LSB & Zinn K. Receptor tyrosine phosphatases are required for motor axon guidance in the Drosophilaembryo, Cell, 1996, 84, 599–609.[Medline]
Desai CJ, Sun Q & Zinn K. Tyrosine phosphorylation and axon guidance: of mice and flies, Curr Opin Neurobiol, 1997, 7, 70–74.[Medline]
Drazba J & Lemmon V. The role of cell adhesion molecules in neurite outgrowth on Müller cells, Dev Biol, 1990, 138, 82–93.[Medline]
Drescher U, Bonhoeffer F & Muller BK. The Eph family in retinal axon guidance, Curr Opin Neurobiol, 1997, 7, 75–80.[Medline]
Fannon AM & Colman DR. A model for central synaptic junctional complex formation based on the differential adhesive specificities of the cadherins, Neuron, 1996, 17, 423–434.[Medline]
Fuchs M, Muller T, Lerch MM & Ulrich A. Association of human protein-tyrosine phosphatase
with members of the armadillo family, J Biol Chem, 1996, 271, 16712–16719.
Gebbink M, van Etten I, Hateboer G, Suijkerbuijk R, Beijersbergen R, van Kessel A & Moolenaar W. Cloning, expression and chromosomal localization of a new putative receptor-like protein tyrosine phosphatase, FEBS Lett, 1991, 290, 123–130.[Medline]
Gebbink MFBG, Zondag GCM, Wubbolts RW, Beijersbergen RL, van Etten I & Moolenaar WH. Cell–cell adhesion mediated by a receptor-like protein tyrosine phosphatase, J Biol Chem, 1993, 268, 16101–16104.
Gebbink MFBG, Zondag GCM, Koningstein GM, Feiken E, Wubbolts RW & Moolenaar WH. Cell surface expression of receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase RPTPµ is regulated by cell–cell contact, J Cell Biol, 1995, 131, 251–260.
Gershon TR, Baker MW, Nitabach M & Macagno ER. The leech receptor protein tyrosine phosphatase HmLAR2 is concentrated in growth cones and is involved in process outgrowth, Development (Camb), 1998, 125, 1183–1190.[Abstract]
Gumbiner BM. Signal transduction by β-catenin, Curr Opin Cell Biol, 1995, 7, 634–640.[Medline]
Halfter W, Newgreen DF, Sauter J & Schwarz U. Oriented axon outgrowth from avian embryonic retinae in culture, Dev Biol, 1983, 95, 56–64.[Medline]
Hamaguchi M, Matsuyoshi N, Ohnishi Y, Gotoh B, Takeichi M & Nagai Y. pp60v-src causes tyrosine phosphorylation and inactivation of the N-cadherin catenin cell adhesion system, EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J, 1993, 12, 307–314.[Medline]
Hamburger V & Hamilton H. A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo, J Morphol, 1951, 88, 49–92.
Hatta K & Takeichi M. Expression of N-cadherin adhesion molecules associated with early morphogenetic events in chick development, Nature, 1986, 320, 447–449.[Medline]
Hiscox S & Jiang WG. Association of PTPµ with catenins in cancer cells: a possible role for E-cadherin, Int J Oncology, 1998, 13, 1077–1080.[Medline]
Hoschuetzky H, Aberle H & Kemler R. β catenin mediates the interaction of the cadherin catenin complex with epidermal growth factor receptor, J Cell Biol, 1994, 127, 1375–1380.
Ignelzi MA, Miller DR, Soriano P & Maness PF. Impaired neurite outgrowth of src-minus cerebellar neurons on the cell adhesion molecule L1, Neuron, 1994, 12, 873–884.[Medline]
Inuzuka H, Miyatani S & Takeichi M. R-cadherin: a novel Ca2+dependent cell–cell adhesion molecule expressed in the retina, Neuron, 1991, 7, 69–79.[Medline]
Kemler R. From cadherins to catenins: cytoplasmic protein interactions and regulation of cell adhesion, TIG (Trends Genet), 1993, 9, 317–321.
Krueger NX, Van Vactor D, Wan HI, Gelbart WM, Goodman CS & Saito H. The transmembrane tyrosine phosphatase DLAR controls motor axon guidance in Drosophila. , Cell, 1996, 84, 611–622.[Medline]
Kypta R, Su H & Reichardt L. Association between a transmembrane protein tyrosine phosphatase and the cadherin-catenin complex, J Cell Biol, 1996, 134, 1519–1529.
Lagenaur C & Lemmon V. An L1-like molecule, the 8D9 antigen, is a potent substrate for neurite extension, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1987, 84, 7753–7757.
Lemmon V, Burden SM, Payne HR, Elmslie GJ & Hlavin ML. Neurite growth on different substrates: permissive versus instructive influences and the role of adhesive strength, J Neurosci, 1992, 12, 818–826.[Abstract]
Lemmon V, Farr K & Lagenaur C. L1 mediated axon outgrowth occurs via a homophilic binding mechanism, Neuron, 1989, 2, 1597–1603.[Medline]
Lemmon V & McLoon S. The appearance of an L1-like molecule in the chick primary visual pathway, J Neurosci, 1986, 6, 2987–2994.[Abstract]
Lin CH & Forscher P. Cytoskeletal remodeling during growth cone– target interactions, J Cell Biol, 1993, 121, 1369–1383.
Lochter A & Schachner M. Tenascin and extracellular matrix glycoproteins: from promotion to polarization of neurite outgrowth in vitro, J Neurosci, 1993, 13, 3986–4000.[Abstract]
Matsunaga M, Hatta K, Nagafuchi A & Takeichi M. Guidance of optic nerve fibres by N-cadherin adhesion molecules, Nature, 1988a, 334, 62–64.[Medline]
Matsunaga M, Hatta K & Takeichi M. Role of N-cadherin cell adhesion molecules in the histogenesis of neural retina, Neuron, 1988b, 1, 289–295.[Medline]
Matsuyoshi N, Hamaguchi M, Taniguchi S, Nagafuchi A, Tsukita S & Takeichi M. Cadherin-mediated cell–cell adhesion is perturbed by v-src tyrosine phosphorylation in metastatic fibroblasts, J Cell Biol, 1992, 118, 703–714.
Mey J & Thanos S. Development of the visual system of the chick—a review, J Hirnforsch, 1992, 33, 673–702.[Medline]
Mi Z, Weng W, Hankin MH, Narayanan V & Lagenaur CF. Maturational changes in cell surface antigen expression in the mouse retina and optic pathway, Dev Brain Res, 1998, 106, 145–154.[Medline]
Neel BG & Tonks NK. Protein tyrosine phosphatases in signal transduction, Curr Opin Cell Biol, 1997, 9, 193–204.[Medline]
Neugebauer KM, Emmett CJ, Venstrom KA & Reichardt LF. Vitronectin and thrombospondin promote retinal neurite outgrowth; developmental regulation and role of integrins, Neuron, 1991, 6, 345–358.[Medline]
Ochiai A, Akimoto S, Kanai Y, Shibata T, Oyama T & Hirohashi S. c-erbB-2 gene product associates with catenins in human cancer cells, Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 1994, 205, 73–78.[Medline]
Paulus W, Baur I, Boyce FM, Breakfield XO & Reeves SA. Self-contained, tetracycline-regulated retroviral vector system for gene delivery to mammalian cells, J Virol, 1996, 70, 62–67.[Abstract]
Prada C, Puga J, Perez-Mendez L, Lopez R & Ramirez G. Spatial and temporal patterns of neurogenesis in the chick retina, Eur J Neurosci, 1991, 3, 559–569.[Medline]
Redies C & Takeichi M. N- and R-cadherin expression in the optic nerve of the chicken embryo, Glia, 1993, 8, 161–171.[Medline]
Reichardt, L.F., B. Bossy, S. Carbonetto, I. de Curtis, C. Emmett, D.E. Hall, M.J. Ignatius, F. Lefcort, E. Napolitano, T. Large, et al. 1990. Neuronal receptors that regulate axon growth. In Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology. Vol. 55. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. 341–350.
Reichardt LF & Tomaselli KJ. Extracellular matrix molecules and their receptors: functions in neural development, Annu Rev Neurosci, 1991, 14, 531–570.[Medline]
Rutishauser U. Molecular and biological properties of a neural cell adhesion molecule, Cold Spring Harbor Symp Quant Biol, 1983, 48, 501–514.
Rutishauser U, Thiery J-P, Brackenbury R & Edelman GM. Adhesion among neural cells of the chick embryo. III. Relationship of the surface molecule CAM to cell adhesion and the development of histotypic patterns, J Cell Biol, 1978, 79, 371–381.
Serra-Pages C, Saito H & Streuli M. Mutational analysis of proprotein processing, subunit association, and shedding of the LAR transmembrane protein tyrosine phosphatase, J Biol Chem, 1994, 269, 23632–23641.
Shibamoto S, Hayakawa M, Takeuchi K, Hori T, Oku N, Miyazawa K, Kitamura N, Takeichi M & Ito F. Tyrosine phosphorylation of β catenin and plakoglobin enhanced by hepatocyte growth factor and epidermal growth factor in human carcinoma cells, Cell Adhes Commun, 1994, 1, 295–305.[Medline]
Silver J & Rutishauser U. Guidance of optic axons in vivo by a preformed adhesive pathway on neuroepithelial endfeet, Dev Biol, 1984, 106, 485–499.[Medline]
Sommer L, Rao M & Anderson DJ. RPTP
and the novel protein tyrosine phosphatase RPTP
are expressed in restricted regions of the developing nervous system, Dev Dyn, 1997, 208, 48–61.[Medline]
Streuli M. Protein tyrosine phosphatases in signaling, Curr Opin Cell Biol, 1996, 8, 182–188.[Medline]
Streuli M, Krueger N, Ariniello P, Tang M, Munro J, Blattler W, Adler D, Disteche C & Saito H. Expression of the receptor-linked protein tyrosine phosphatase LAR: proteolytic cleavage and shedding of the CAM-like extracellular region, EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J, 1992, 11, 897–907.[Medline]
Tang J, Landmesser L & Rutishauser U. Polysialic acid influences specific pathfinding by avian motoneurons, Neuron, 1992, 8, 1031–1044.[Medline]
Tessier-Lavigne M. Eph receptor tyrosine kinases, axon repulsion, and the development of topographic maps, Cell, 1995, 82, 345–348.[Medline]
Tessier-Lavigne M & Goodman CS. The molecular biology of axon guidance, Science, 1996, 274, 1123–1133.
Tsui HT, Pope WB, Kim CS & Klein WL. Transient expression of adheron molecules during chick retinal development, J Neurobiol, 1992, 23, 720–738.[Medline]
Tsukita S, Oishi K, Akiyama T, Yamanashi Y, Yamamoto T & Tsukita S. Specific proto-oncogene tyrosine kinases of srcfamily are enriched in cell-to-cell adherens junctions where the level of tyrosine phosphorylation is elevated, J Cell Biol, 1991, 113, 867–879.
Volberg T, Geiger B, Dror R & Zick Y. Modulation of intercellular adherens-type junctions and tyrosine phosphorylation of their components in RSV-transformed cultured chick lens cells, Cell Regul, 1991, 2, 105–120.[Medline]
Volberg T, Zick Y, Dror R, Sabanay I, Gilon C, Levitzki A & Geiger B. The effect of tyrosine-specific protein phosphorylation on the assembly of adherens-type junctions, EMBO (Eur Mol Biol Organ) J, 1992, 11, 1733–1742.[Medline]
Warren SL & Nelson WJ. Nonmitogenic morphoregulatory action of pp60v-src on multicellular epithelial structures, Mol Cell Biol, 1987, 7, 1326–1337.
Zondag G, Koningstein G, Jiang YP, Sap J, Moolenaar WH & Gebbink M. Homophilic interactions mediated by receptor tyrosine phosphatases µ and
, J Biol Chem, 1995, 270, 14247–14250.
This article has been cited by other articles:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|