Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF, 132K) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Citation Map Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new content in the JCB Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kahana, J. A. Articles by Cleveland, D. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kahana, J. A. Articles by Cleveland, D. W. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/1999//1205 $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 146, Number 6, , 1999 1205-1210

Beyond Nuclear Transport

Jason A. Kahana^a and Don W. Cleveland^a

^a Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research and Departments of Medicine and Neuroscience, University of California at San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, California 92093-0660
Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Departments of Medicine and Neuroscience, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, Department 0660, La Jolla, CA 92093.(858) 534-7659(858) 534-7811

dcleveland{at}ucsd.edu

© 1999 The Rockefeller University Press

IT'S not easy being a nuclear transport factor. During the G1, S, and G2 phases of the cell cycle, the nucleocytoplasmic transport machinery must tirelessly zigzag between the nucleus and cytoplasm while directing other proteins to the correct subcellular compartment. When M phase finally arrives, and the nucleus breaks down, do these proteins finally get to take a break? Apparently not. In the case of the Ran-GTPase and its associated nuclear transport factors, there is no rest for the weary. Instead, Ran and its associated proteins shift their focus from nuclear transport to the regulation of microtubule dynamics. Recent findings by several groups have shown that the GTP-bound form of Ran is necessary for the nucleation and organization of microtubule structures during M phase. Moreover, the implication that the active form of Ran is concentrated in the vicinity of chromosomes suggests that these findings may resolve the long-standing question of how chromosomes can influence spindle assembly in the absence of microtubule-nucleating organelles (i.e., as in plant mitosis or mammalian meiosis).

	Ran and Nuclear Transport

Top Ran and Nuclear Transport Microtubule Nucleation by Ran... Manipulation of Ran-GTP Levels... How Does Ran-GTP Function... A Model for Ran-GTP–driven... Partitioning of Ran-GTP during... References

 
Ran is an abundant GTP-binding protein that is required for the trafficking of proteins and RNA in and out of the nucleus (Moore and Blobel 1993). In general, it forms a complex with nuclear transport signal (NLS) receptors and their cargoes and directs their movement through nuclear pores. Like other small GTP-binding proteins (e.g., Ras), Ran's GTP hydrolysis activity and guanine nucleotide affinity are modulated by accessory factors. GTP hydrolysis is stimulated by a GTPase-activating protein known as Ran-GAP1 (Bischoff et al. 1994) and its accessory factor RanBP1 (Bischoff et al. 1995), while replacement of GDP with GTP is accomplished by the guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) RCC1 (Bischoff and Ponstingl 1995; Ohtsubo et al. 1989). Together, these proteins comprise an enzymatic cycle by which Ran binds GTP, hydrolyzes it to GDP (due to the activity of Ran-GAP1), releases the GDP (due to RCC1 activity), and rebinds GTP (due to the presence of a relatively high GTP concentration in the cell).

Ran's function as a nuclear transport factor depends upon the nature of its bound guanine nucleotide. Specificity of binding (i.e., to import or export receptors) and direction of movement is determined by whether Ran is bound to GTP or GDP. Ran-GDP typically associates with nuclear import receptors (e.g., importin /β) and directs their movement from the cytoplasm into the nucleus. Conversely, Ran-GTP generally associates with nuclear export receptors (e.g., CRM1) and directs movement of their cargoes from the cytoplasm into the nucleus (see Koepp and Silver 1996; Mattaj and Englmeier 1998).

According to this scheme, the Ran protein should be predominantly bound to GTP while in the nucleus and to GDP while in the cytoplasm. This is achieved by compartmentalization of Ran's GAP and GEF. Whereas Ran is localized throughout the cell, RCC1 is bound to chromatin in the nucleus (Ohtsubo et al. 1989), while Ran-GAP1 and RanBP1 are found exclusively in the cytoplasm (Matunis et al. 1996; Richards et al. 1996). Consequently, Ran-GDP is prevalent in the cytoplasm due to stimulation of GTPase activity by Ran-GAP1 and RanBP1, whereas Ran-GTP is prevalent in the nucleus due to the nucleotide exchange activity of RCC1 (Fig. 1 A) (Koepp and Silver 1996; Mattaj and Englmeier 1998). Thus, the localization of the GAP and GEF is paramount in regulating the proper function of Ran in nuclear transport.

View larger version (23K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 1 Localization of the Ran GAP and GEF leads to compartmentalization of Ran-GTP vs. Ran-GDP. (A) During interphase, nuclear localization of RCC1 (green) and cytoplasmic localization of RanGAP1 and RanBP1 (red) yield a distribution of Ran-GDP (yellow) in the cytoplasm and Ran-GTP (blue) in the nucleus. (B) During mitosis or meiosis, chromatin-associated RCC1 establishes a gradient of Ran-GTP that is concentrated at the surface of the chromosomes.

	Microtubule Nucleation by Ran and Its Associated Factors

Top Ran and Nuclear Transport Microtubule Nucleation by Ran... Manipulation of Ran-GTP Levels... How Does Ran-GTP Function... A Model for Ran-GTP–driven... Partitioning of Ran-GTP during... References

Well beyond this initial suggestion, a series of recent papers have converged upon the discovery that Ran and its cohorts are key components of aster formation and spindle assembly, especially for spindles assembled in the absence of centrosomes. An initial insight into this process came from the identification (Nakamura et al. 1998) of a novel mammalian Ran-binding protein, RanBPM, that could elicit microtubule polymerization. Isolated on the basis of its interaction with Ran-GTP in a two-hybrid assay, RanBPM has been shown to associate with centrosomes, the microtubule-nucleating centers of mammalian cells. Interestingly, it has been observed that overexpression of RanBPM can induce ectopic aster formation in transfected cells. Such asters are structurally similar to normal centrosomal asters in that they contain centrosomal proteins such as -tubulin at their foci. Moreover, inhibition of RanBPM or Ran activity can prevent in vitro aster formation from a mixture of purified centrosomes and tubulin. Taken together, these results suggest that Ran and RanBPM somehow act together to effect microtubule nucleation.

	Manipulation of Ran-GTP Levels Leads to Alterations in Aster Formation in Xenopus Extracts

Top Ran and Nuclear Transport Microtubule Nucleation by Ran... Manipulation of Ran-GTP Levels... How Does Ran-GTP Function... A Model for Ran-GTP–driven... Partitioning of Ran-GTP during... References

 
It has long been known that asters will readily grow from sperm centrioles in Xenopus egg extracts arrested in meiotic metaphase II. Surprisingly, this centriole-mediated process has now been found to be Ran-GTP–dependent. Reduction in the relative levels of Ran-GTP by immunodepletion of RCC1 (Ohba et al. 1999) or by addition of a mutant form of Ran that favors GDP binding (T24N; see Table ; Carazo-Salas et al. 1999; Kalab et al. 1999; Ohba et al. 1999; Wilde and Zheng 1999), severely inhibits aster formation from centrioles. Therefore, the GTP-bound form of Ran is necessary for centriole-dependent aster formation in these extracts.

	How Does Ran-GTP Function in Microtubule Assembly?

Top Ran and Nuclear Transport Microtubule Nucleation by Ran... Manipulation of Ran-GTP Levels... How Does Ran-GTP Function... A Model for Ran-GTP–driven... Partitioning of Ran-GTP during... References

 
Although it can induce aster assembly in Xenopus extracts, Ran-GTP does not stimulate microtubule polymerization from purified tubulin subunits (Wilde and Zheng 1999). Thus, there must exist additional factors that more directly affect polymerization properties. The most plausible candidate now known for such an effector is RanBPM, which both associates with centrosomes and Ran-GTP in mammalian cells. In the absence of centrosomes, the simplest view is that a soluble (i.e., non-centrosomal) portion of RanBPM (or an as yet undiscovered relative) may associate with Ran-GTP generated by chromosomal RCC1, thereby promoting microtubule polymerization adjacent to chromosomes.

Is there a role for GTP hydrolysis by Ran in microtubule assembly? It has been suggested that during nuclear transport, the nucleotide-bound state of Ran acts simply as a switch to delineate the direction of movement and that the energy of GTP hydrolysis is not strictly required (Richards et al. 1997; Schwoebel et al. 1998). The observation that forms of Ran that do not hydrolyze GTP (e.g. Ran L45E, Ran-GTPS) can induce aster formation in Xenopus extracts (Carazo-Salas et al. 1999; Kalab et al. 1999; Ohba et al. 1999; Wilde and Zheng 1999), suggests that a similar situation exists for microtubule assembly. However, while GTPS-bound Ran can induce aster formation, such asters are considerably smaller than those formed by Ran-GTP (Ohba et al. 1999). Thus, GTP hydrolysis by Ran may have some secondary role in the elongation of previously nucleated microtubules.

	A Model for Ran-GTP–driven Spindle Formation

Top Ran and Nuclear Transport Microtubule Nucleation by Ran... Manipulation of Ran-GTP Levels... How Does Ran-GTP Function... A Model for Ran-GTP–driven... Partitioning of Ran-GTP during... References

 
The recognition that Ran-GTP may be a key component of microtubule nucleation allows resolution of an old cell biological problem: how chromatin can drive spindle assembly, especially in the absence of centrosomes (Karsenti et al. 1984). What now seems likely is that in the absence of a nucleus, chromatin-bound RCC1 and cytoplasmic RanGAP1 produce a natural gradient of Ran-GTP that is most concentrated at the chromosome surface (Fig. 2 A). Consequently, a Ran-GTP–dependent factor such as RanBPM, would stimulate microtubule assembly adjacent to the chromosomes. Then, other cellular factors could act to organize these microtubules into spindles. For instance, it has been shown that the chromosome-associated, kinesin-like protein XKLP1 is required for the stable attachment of microtubules to chromatin (Vernos et al. 1995; Walczak et al. 1998). Such chromatin-bound, plus end–directed kinesins could, thus, attach to the newly formed microtubules and draw the rapidly growing plus ends to the surface of the chromosomes (Fig. 2 B). Finally, a complex of cytoplasmic dynein, dynactin and NuMA, previously shown to be required for maintenance of focused microtubule arrays both in the presence or absence of centrosomes (Yang and Snyder 1992; Merdes et al. 1996), could organize the chromosome-bound microtubules into spindles (Fig. 2 C). This would arise through the microtubule cross-linking activity of NuMA and the retrograde motility of dynein acting together to draw the microtubules into poles at their minus ends. Such a model could explain the inside-out assembly of spindles during vertebrate oogenesis and plant mitosis, both of which are accomplished without centrosomes.

View larger version (22K): [in this window] [in a new window] [Download PPT slide]   Figure 2 Three-step mechanism by which Ran-GTP initiates centrosome-free spindle assembly. (A) The high concentration of Ran-GTP produced by chromatin-bound RCC1 in the vicinity of chromatin stimulates microtubule assembly around chromosomes (see Carazo-Salas et al. 1999). (B) These randomly-oriented microtubules are then captured at their plus ends by chromosome-bound, microtubule-binding proteins (e.g., XKLP1). (C) Finally, the minus ends of microtubules are focused into poles by cytoplasmic dynein and its microtubule-cross-linking cargo NuMA.

	Partitioning of Ran-GTP during Interphase and M Phase

Top Ran and Nuclear Transport Microtubule Nucleation by Ran... Manipulation of Ran-GTP Levels... How Does Ran-GTP Function... A Model for Ran-GTP–driven... Partitioning of Ran-GTP during... References

 
The linkage of Ran-GTP to M phase microtubule nucleation reinforces a principle long understood from nuclear transport. Compartmentalization of the Ran GAP and GEF modulate the function of Ran itself. Because of its association with chromatin, RCC1 can establish a high concentration of Ran-GTP exclusively in the vicinity of chromosomes during M phase. This, in turn, can serve as the initial positional cue for spindle formation in the absence of centrosomes. Thus, the observation that the GTP-bound form of Ran can stimulate microtubule polymerization offers a significant insight into the process by which chromosomes drive spindle assembly, especially in the absence of microtubule-organizing centers.

Submitted: 24 August 1999

Revised: 2 September 1999

Accepted: 2 September 1999

	References

Top Ran and Nuclear Transport Microtubule Nucleation by Ran... Manipulation of Ran-GTP Levels... How Does Ran-GTP Function... A Model for Ran-GTP–driven... Partitioning of Ran-GTP during... References

 

Bischoff F.R. & Ponstingl H.. Catalysis of guanine nucleotide exchange of Ran by RCC1 and stimulation of hydrolysis of Ran-bound GTP by Ran-GAP1, Methods Enzymol., 257, 1995, 135–144.[Medline]

Bischoff F.R., Klebe C., Kretschmer J., Wittinghofer A. & Ponstingl H.. RanGAP1 induces GTPase activity of nuclear Ras-related Ran, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 91, 1994, 2587–2591.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Bischoff F.R., Krebber H., Smirnova E., Dong W. & Ponstingl H.. Co-activation of RanGTPase and inhibition of GTP dissociation by Ran-GTP binding protein RanBP1, EMBO (Eur. Mol. Biol. Organ.) J., 14, 1995, 705–715.[Medline]

Bischoff F.R. & Ponstingl H.. Mitotic regulator protein RCC1 is complexed with a nuclear ras-related polypeptide, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 88, 1991, 10830–10834.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Carazo-Salas R.E., Guarguaglini G., Gruss O.J., Segref A., Karsenti E. & Mattaj I.W.. Generation of GTP-bound Ran by RCC1 is required for chromatin-induced mitotic spindle formation, Nature., 400, 1999, 178–181.[Medline]

Heald R., Tournebize R., Blank T., Sandaltzopoulos R., Becker P., Hyman A. & Karsenti E.. Self-organization of microtubules into bipolar spindles around artificial chromosomes in Xenopus egg extracts, Nature., 382, 1996, 420–425.[Medline]

Kalab P., Pu R.T. & Dasso M.. The ran GTPase regulates mitotic spindle assembly, Curr. Biol., 9, 1999, 481–484.[Medline]

Karsenti E., Newport J. & Kirschner M.. Respective roles of centrosomes and chromatin in the conversion of microtubule arrays from interphase to metaphase, J. Cell Biol., 99, 1984, 47s–54s.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Kirkpatrick D. & Solomon F.. Overexpression of yeast homologs of the mammalian checkpoint gene RCC1 suppresses the class of alpha-tubulin mutations that arrest with excess microtubules, Genetics., 137, 1994, 381–392.[Abstract]

Klebe C., Bischoff F.R., Ponstingl H. & Wittinghofer A.. Interaction of the nuclear GTP-binding protein Ran with its regulatory proteins RCC1 and RanGAP1, Biochemistry., 34, 1995, 639–647.[Medline]

Koepp D.M. & Silver P.A.. A GTPase controlling nuclear traffickingrunning the right way or walking RANdomly?, Cell., 87, 1996, 1–4.[Medline]

Lounsbury K.M., Richards S.A., Carey K.L. & Macara I.G.. Mutations within the Ran/TC4 GTPase. Effects on regulatory factor interactions and subcellular localization, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 1996, 32834–32841.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Mattaj I.W. & Englmeier L.. Nucleocytoplasmic transportthe soluble phase, Annu. Rev. Biochem., 67, 1998, 265–306.[Medline]

Matunis M.J., Coutavas E. & Blobel G.. A novel ubiquitin-like modification modulates the partitioning of the Ran-GTPase-activating protein RanGAP1 between the cytosol and the nuclear pore complex, J. Cell Biol., 135, 1996, 1457–1470.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Merdes A., Ramyar K., Vechio J.D. & Cleveland D.W.. A complex of NuMA and cytoplasmic dynein is essential for mitotic spindle assembly, Cell., 87, 1996, 447–458.[Medline]

Moore M.S. & Blobel G.. The GTP-binding protein Ran/TC4 is required for protein import into the nucleus, Nature., 365, 1993, 661–663.[Medline]

Nakamura M., Masuda H., Horii J., Kuma K., Yokoyama N., Ohba T., Nishitani H., Miyata T., Tanaka M. & Nishimoto T.. When overexpressed, a novel centrosomal protein, RanBPM, causes ectopic microtubule nucleation similar to gamma-tubulin, J. Cell Biol., 143, 1998, 1041–1052.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ohba T., Nakamura M., Nishitani H. & Nishimoto T.. Self-organization of microtubule asters induced in Xenopus egg extracts by GTP-bound Ran, Science., 284, 1999, 1356–1358.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ohtsubo M., Kai R., Furuno N., Sekiguchi T., Sekiguchi M., Hayashida H., Kuma K., Miyata T., Fukushige S. & Murotsu T.. Isolation and characterization of the active cDNA of the human cell cycle gene (RCC1) involved in the regulation of onset of chromosome condensation, Genes Dev., 1, 1987, 585–593.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ohtsubo M., Okazaki H. & Nishimoto T.. The RCC1 protein, a regulator for the onset of chromosome condensation locates in the nucleus and binds to DNA, J. Cell Biol., 109, 1989, 1389–1397.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Ouspenski I.I.. A RanBP1 mutation which does not visibly affect nuclear import may reveal additional functions of the ran GTPase system, Exp. Cell Res., 244, 1998, 171–183.[Medline]

Richards S.A., Lounsbury K.M., Carey K.L. & Macara I.G.. A nuclear export signal is essential for the cytosolic localization of the Ran binding protein, RanBP1, J. Cell Biol., 134, 1996, 1157–1168.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Richards S.A., Carey K.L. & Macara I.G.. Requirement of guanosine triphosphate-bound ran for signal-mediated nuclear protein export, Science., 276, 1997, 1842–1844.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Schwoebel E.D., Talcott B., Cushman I. & Moore M.S.. Ran-dependent signal-mediated nuclear import does not require GTP hydrolysis by Ran, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 1998, 35170–35175.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Vernos I., Raats J., Hirano T., Heasman J., Karsenti E. & Wylie C.. Xklp1, a chromosomal Xenopus kinesin-like protein essential for spindle organization and chromosome positioning, Cell., 81, 1995, 117–127.[Medline]

Walczak C.E., Vernos I., Mitchison T.J., Karsenti E. & Heald R.. A model for the proposed roles of different microtubule-based motor proteins in establishing spindle bipolarity, Curr. Biol., 8, 1998, 903–913.[Medline]

Wilde A. & Zheng Y.. Stimulation of microtubule aster formation and spindle assembly by the small GTPase Ran, Science., 284, 1999, 1359–1362.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Yang C.H. & Snyder M.. The nuclear-mitotic apparatus protein is important in the establishment and maintenance of the bipolar mitotic spindle apparatus, Mol. Biol. Cell., 3, 1992, 1259–1267.[Abstract]

Zhang C., Hughes M. & Clarke P.R.. Ran-GTP stabilises microtubule asters and inhibits nuclear assembly in Xenopus egg extracts, J. Cell Sci., 112, 1999, 2453–2461.[Abstract]

CiteULike

Complore

Connotea

Del.icio.us

Digg

Facebook

Reddit

Technorati

Twitter

This Article Full Text (PDF, 132K) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Citation Map Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new content in the JCB Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Kahana, J. A. Articles by Cleveland, D. W. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Kahana, J. A. Articles by Cleveland, D. W. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?