|
||
© The Rockefeller University Press,
0021-9525/2000//785 $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 150, Number 4,
, 2000 785-796
Original Article |
Two Pathways through Cdc42 Couple the N-Formyl Receptor to Actin Nucleation in Permeabilized Human Neutrophils
mglogauer{at}rics.bwh.harvard.edu
We developed a permeabilization method that retains coupling between N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine tripeptide (FMLP) receptor stimulation, shape changes, and barbed-end actin nucleation in human neutrophils. Using GTP analogues, phosphoinositides, a phosphoinositide-binding peptide, constitutively active or inactive Rho GTPase mutants, and activating or inhibitory peptides derived from neural Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome family proteins (N-WASP), we identified signaling pathways leading from the FMLP receptor to actin nucleation that require Cdc42, but then diverge. One branch traverses the actin nucleation pathway involving N-WASP and the Arp2/3 complex, whereas the other operates through active Rac to promote actin nucleation. Both pathways depend on phosphoinositide expression. Since maximal inhibition of the Arp2/3 pathway leaves an N17Rac inhibitable alternate pathway intact, we conclude that this alternate involves phosphoinositide-mediated uncapping of actin filament barbed ends.
Key Words: Arp2/3 actin assembly signal transduction pathways Rac FMLP
© 2000 The Rockefeller University Press
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The most intensively studied chemoattractant, useful because of its chemical simplicity, is the N-formyl-methionyl-leucyl-phenylalanine tripeptide (FMLP) (Schiffmann et al. 1975). By ligating a serpentine membrane receptor (Gerard and Gerard 1994), it induces, among other responses important for host defense against infection (Gao et al. 1999), a several-fold increase in the proportion of polymerized neutrophil actin (Howard and Oresajo 1985). Although this large burst of net actin assembly is not necessarily directly relevant to locomotion, it is a useful readout for linking the FMLP receptor to actin nucleation, a step that determines when and where new actin-based structures arise. Complicating the study of the linkage between signaling steps and actin turnover in neutrophils, however, is the fact that neutrophils are small, protease-rich, fragile end cells, not amenable to transfection or microinjection, techniques that have abetted investigations of this relationship in tissue culture cells. Indeed, focusing on one important actin remodeling reaction, the nucleation of actin assembly, reveals inconsistencies in the published literature.
Some of the first evidence for involvement of GTPases in the regulation of cellular actin polymerization arose from research with neutrophils (Särndal et al. 1989; Downey et al. 1990). Rho family GTPases are presently the most prominent mediators of particular types of actin assembly in tissue culture cells, and of these GTPases the one most implicated in large increases in cellular actin assembly and locomotion is the Rac subfamily (Hall 1998). The principal Rac species in neutrophils is Rac2, also clearly involved in activation of the neutrophil oxidase enzyme complex that generates microbicidal reactive oxygen radicals (Bokoch 1995). FMLP stimulation activates Rac2 in intact neutrophils (Akasaki et al. 1999; Benard et al. 1999), and bone marrow neutrophils of Rac2 knockout mice have an almost negligible chemotactic responsiveness to FMLP, interleukin 8, and leukotriene B4. Furthermore, the Rac2 null neutrophils have marked impairment in the onset and extent of actin polymerization responses to FMLP, as well as to interleukin 8, although the comparatively delayed and less robust actin polymerization induced by G-CSF or TNF
is normal in these cells (Roberts et al. 1999).
Despite the abundant data supporting an intermediacy of Rac in intact neutrophil actin assembly, finding a consistent role for Rac in neutrophil actin turnover using biochemical approaches has been elusive. Arcaro 1998 reported that Rac caused complexes of actin with gelsolin to dissociate in soluble neutrophil extracts, a response that could promote actin nucleation by exposing the fast-growing (barbed) ends of actin protofilaments. Kaetanaev and Wymann 1998, however, while able to show that GTP
S induces actin assembly in neutrophil extracts, were unable to find any effect of Rac or Cdc42 on this reaction. In extensive investigations of actin assembly in neutrophils, Zigmond and coworkers have shown that GTP has an important role in actin nucleation activity (Zigmond et al. 1997, Zigmond et al. 1998). This nucleation activity promotes barbed orientation actin polymerization (Redmond et al. 1994). They have observed that the Rho GTPase Cdc42, which FMLP also activates in intact neutrophils (Benard et al. 1999), is a potent inducer of actin polymerization in soluble neutrophil extracts. But they have not detected any effect of Rac on this actin nucleation, although it stimulates phosphoinositide synthesis in the extracts (Zigmond et al. 1997, Zigmond et al. 1998). The linkage of Cdc42 to neutrophil actin polymerization resonates with an avalanche of recent data pointing to a pathway in which Cdc42, Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome family proteins (WASP), and the actin-related protein (Arp2/3) complex interact to promote de novo actin polymerization in vitro and in vivo (Higgs and Pollard 1999; Machesky and Insall 1999; Welch 1999). While some data indirectly links Rac to this reaction sequence, the connection is presently not very clear (Miki et al. 1998).
To try and resolve these discrepancies, we adapted an approach to neutrophils previously taken with another hematopoietic cell, the blood platelet, to analyzing the steps linking receptor perturbation to actin assembly. We previously studied the pathways between the PAR1 thrombin receptor of platelets and actin polymerization, finding that Rac1 was an important intermediary (Hartwig et al. 1995). The principal experimental technique involves controlled partial permeabilization of the plasma membrane so as to preserve essential intermediates required to sustain the pathways, but to permit introduction of activators and inhibitors of signal transduction cascades. We describe our results here with neutrophils and conclude that complementary pathways encompassing components studied by different methodologies link FMLP receptor occupancy with actin assembly in the human neutrophil.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A vector containing the sequence for N17Rac2 (pcDNA3m) was kindly provided by G. Bokoch (Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA), and the N17Rac2 gene was isolated using a BamH1/EcoR1 digest and subsequently subcloned into the BamH1/EcoR1 site of pGEX2T (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). We produced recombinant bacterial GST-Rho GTPase fusion proteins as described (Hartwig et al. 1995) using vectors encoding GST-V12Rac1 or GST-N17Rac1 (provided by Dr. A. Hall, University College, London, UK) or GST-N17Cdc42, GST-Rac2Q61L, or GST-V12Cdc42 (provided by Dr. G. Bokoch, Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA) or GST-N17Rac2.
We used a 10-mer polyphosphoinositide-binding peptide based on the phosphoinositide-binding site of gelsolin (residues 160–169 QRLFQVKGRR; Janmey et al. 1992). A control gelsolin peptide that included the same residues (in a random order) as the gelsolin 10-mer was used (FRVKLKQGQR). Rajat Rohatgi and Marc Kirschner (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA) provided recombinant GST fusion proteins derived from human neural (N)-WASP (GST-V, aa 392–449; GST-CA, aa 450–505; and VCA, aa 392–505; Rohatgi et al. 1999). We dispersed PS, PI, PIP, PI(4,5)P2, and PI(3,4,5)P3 into uniform micelles by sonication (Janmey and Stossel 1989).
Preparation of Neutrophils
We obtained blood from consenting healthy adult volunteers by venipuncture into 0.1 vol of sodium citrate anticoagulant (Sigma-Aldrich). We isolated neutrophils using neutrophil isolation media (NIM; Cardinal Associates) according to instructions provided by its manufacturer. The resulting cell preparation was >95% neutrophils as assessed by hematoxylin and eosin staining. We suspended neutrophils at 5 x 106 cells/ml in HBSS. We performed all procedures with endotoxin-free solutions and completed all experiments within 3 h of blood collection.
Permeabilization and Measurement of Actin Nuclei
To analyze actin nucleation activity, we determined the ability of permeabilized neutrophils to accelerate spontaneous actin assembly measured as enhancement of pyrene actin fluorescence with polymerization (Hartwig 1992; Hartwig et al. 1995). We permeabilized resting neutrophils (5 x 106 /ml) for 10 s using 0.1 vol of OG buffer (PHEM buffer containing 4% octyl glucoside, 10 µM phallacidin, 42 nM leupeptin, 10 mM benzamidine, and 0.123 mM aprotinin) or NP-40 (final concentration of 1%). We stopped the permeabilization process by diluting the detergent with 3 vol of buffer B (1 mM Tris, 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM MgCl2, 10 mM KCl, 5 mM β-mercaptoethanol, 5 mM ATP; pH 7.4). We then added activators or inhibitors of actin nucleation as described in Results. We then assayed for nuclei by adding pyrene-labeled rabbit skeletal muscle actin (Hartwig 1992) to a final concentration of 1 µM, and followed the fluorescence increase with a Perkin-Elmer spectrophotometer at excitation and emission wavelengths of 366 and 386 nm, respectively (Hartwig et al. 1995). We determined the contribution of actin filament barbed ends to the rate of fluorescence increase by the addition of 2 µM cytochalasin B, and converted the cytochalasin B-sensitive actin assembly rate into the number of nucleation sites as described previously (Hartwig 1992). We normalized the results to baseline control levels for each set of experiments. The range of absolute values for controls was 4,000–9,000 barbed ends per cell with a mean of 7,500 ± 667 (mean ± SEM; 14 experiments).
Shape Change Experiments
To observe potential shape changes induced by FMLP in n-octyl-b-glucopyranoside (OG) permeabilized neutrophils, isolated cells were placed onto coverslips for 60 s. Attached cells were then permeabilized as outlined above, exposed to FMLP or vehicle alone, and were then fixed for 3 min with 3.7% formaldehyde. Cells were incubated with 0.5 U/ml Alexa 488 phalloidin for 5 min and observed. Under these conditions, Alexa phalloidin fluorescence was undetectable in nonpermeabilized cells. DIC and fluorescent images were acquired using a Princeton instruments Interline 1300 x 1030 12-bit digital camera and Isee software (Inovision). Images were prepared using Adobe PhotoshopTM.
Confocal Fluorescence Microscopy
We exposed permeabilized cells to FMLP or vehicle alone for 150 s. We then added Alexa 488 phalloidin (0.5 U/300 µl sample; Molecular Probes) and 0.3 µM actin (1 rhodamine actin to 45 unlabeled actins; Cytoskeleton) for 30 s. We fixed the cells in 3.7% formaldehyde for 3 min and then gently centrifuged them onto polylysine-coated coverslips using a Cytospin (300 rpm for 3 min). We examined coverslips mounted in Moviol (Calbiochem) using a BioRad Confocal Microscope (MRC 1024 MP). We determined the cell dimensions in image sections of 0.5 µm with the final image of the middle section of the cell being stored for later analysis. Digital images were prepared using Adobe PhotoshopTM. Quantification of the rhodamine actin assembly was done using NIH image. Mean pixel fluorescence values were determined from the confocal images of the middle section of permeabilized neutrophils.
Electron Microscopy
We attached permeabilized neutrophils to the surface of polylysine-coated glass coverslips by centrifugation at 280 g for 5 min and then fixed the cells with 1% gluteraldehyde in the PHEM buffer (Schliwa and Van Blerkom 1981) for 10 min. We washed the fixed cells extensively with distilled water, subjected them to rapid freezing, freeze drying at –90°C, and coating with 1.4 nm of platinum with rotation and 2.5 nm of carbon without rotation (Cressington CFE-50 apparatus). We separated the replicas from the coverslips in 25% hydrofluoric acid and picked them up on carbon-formvar copper grids. We photographed the specimens at 100 kV in a JEOL-1200 EX electron microscope.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
We determined the optimal FMLP exposure time by determining free barbed ends after various FMLP exposure times. Cells were permeabilized, incubated with 30 nM FMLP for the indicated time, and then assayed for free barbed ends. Fig. 1 E demonstrates that the maximal detectable number of free barbed ends occurs at three minutes.
Weiner et al. 1999 noted that 1% NP-40 increased actin nucleation assessed qualitatively by light microscopy in neutrophils, and inferred that this detergent released proteases that degraded actin filament barbed-end capping proteins. Consistent with those findings, neutrophils treated with 1% NP-40 for ten seconds have much higher basal actin nucleation activity than neutrophils permeabilized with OG. The number of end equivalents in the unstimulated NP-40–treated cells (17,005 ± 3,415) is comparable to that of OG-permeabilized FMLP-stimulated neutrophils (17,444 ± 4,340). The addition of the protease inhibitors we use in the OG permeabilization solution does not alter the actin nucleation activity of the NP-40–treated cells. NP-40 permeabilized neutrophils fail to increase actin nucleation activity in response to FMLP either in the presence or absence of the protease inhibitors employed. Although the protease inhibitors do not affect actin nucleation activity in OG-permeabilized cells, we retained them as part of our standard assay system.
Actin Nuclei Are Within Permeabilized Neutrophils
Centrifugation (14,000 g for 3 min) of OG permeabilized neutrophils exposed to 30 nM FMLP removes
95% of the actin nucleation activity from the resulting supernatant, demonstrating that the pyrene-actin in the assembly readout polymerized onto the neutrophil cytoskeleton.
70% of OG permeabilized cells picked up trypan blue and rhodamine phalloidin. We saw no difference in the percent of cells taking up trypan blue between 30 s and 300 s after permeabilization and dilution, confirming that the dilution of the OG with buffer B is effective in stopping further cell permeabilization.
Electron micrographs reveal perforations evenly distributed over the permeabilized neutrophil surface with large regions of intact membrane (Fig. 2 A). DIC images of neutrophils attached to poly-L-lysine–coated coverslips and then permeabilized as described demonstrate protrusive changes at their edges subsequent to FMLP treatment, which resemble early pseudopodia (Fig. 2 B). In three experiments, 52 ± 3% of FMLP-treated cells demonstrated such shapes compared with 18 ± 8% of control cells. Actin containing extensions visible in the FMLP exposed OG permeabilized neutrophils are absent in the control cells.
|
Fig. 3 shows the relationship between the number of actin nuclei stimulated in optimally permeabilized cells and the FMLP concentration. FMLP >1 nM induces detectable filament barbed ends, and FMLP concentrations >100 nM effect maximal exposure.
|
|
45 µM produce complete suppression of FMLP's effects. A random 10-mer peptide containing the same residues as the gelsolin 10-mer had no inhibitory activity on the FMLP-mediated increase in free barbed ends.
GTPases Induce and Are Intermediates in FMLP-mediated Actin Nucleation in OG-permeabilized Neutrophils
Addition of 16 µM GTP
S to OG-permeabilized neutrophils results in a greater than threefold increase in actin nuclei, whereas 100 µM GDPβS strongly inhibits all FMLP nucleation activity. PI(4,5)P2 overcomes GDPβS inhibition, suggesting that the GDPβS effect is upstream from PI(4,5)P2 in the signal transduction pathway from FMLP to actin nucleation (Table ).
|
|
N17Rac2 (3 µM) inhibited up to two-thirds of the barbed end increase mediated by 150 nM V12CDC42, whereas N17CDC42 (3 µM) had no significant inhibitory effect on the increase in free barbed ends caused by the constitutively active Rac2 construct (Q61L; Fig. 5 C). These results place Rac downstream of CDC42.
Contribution of the Arp2/3 Nucleation Pathway in Response to FMLP Stimulation of Neutrophils
VCA (400 nM), a peptide derived from N-WASP that activates ARP2/3-mediated de novo actin assembly in vitro (Rohatgi et al. 1999), increases nucleation activity of OG-permeabilized neutrophils by 219 ± 28% (mean ± SEM of three separate experiments) over the control untreated level. Neither N17Rac1 nor N17CDC42 inhibited the VCA-mediated increase in actin nucleation (data not shown). Conversely, another N-WASP-derived peptide, CA, which inhibits ARP2/3-induced nucleation activity in Xenopus laevis egg extracts (Rohatgi et al. 1999), reduces by
50% the ability of FMLP to nucleate actin in permeabilized neutrophils at saturating levels (Fig. 6 B). Combined with 2.7 µM N17Rac1, 3 µM CA peptide completely quenches the FMLP-mediated increase in nucleating activity (Fig. 6 A). A control peptide, GST-V (from the N-WASP V-domain), demonstrated no inhibitory effect on the FMLP-mediated increase in free barbed ends. The CA peptide (maximal inhibitory concentration of 3 µM) partially inhibits free barbed ends induced by GTP
S, V12CDC42, and PIP2 (Fig. 6 C).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
An alternative way to create nucleation sites in activated cells is to uncap the barbed ends of pre-existing actin filaments, and severing of actin filaments before uncapping can amplify the number of nuclei generated by this mechanism. Our morphological and biochemical investigations with activating platelets provided evidence favoring such a pathway with Rac as an important intermediary (Hartwig and Shevlin 1991; Hartwig 1992; Hartwig et al. 1995). A key support for this mechanism was the fact that inhibiting or ablating the actin severing and capping protein, gelsolin, markedly diminished nucleation activity in platelets or cultured fibroblasts after stimulation with agents that promote actin polymerization (Witke et al. 1995; Azuma et al. 1998). Experiments with gelsolin null neutrophils have revealed that upon FMLP activation, gelsolin null mouse neutrophils exhibit a 1.5-fold increase in free barbed ends compared with the almost threefold increase exhibited by wild-type mouse neutrophils (our unpublished results). In addition, actin filament barbed-end capping proteins release from permeabilized platelets after thrombin receptor stimulation (Barkalow et al. 1996; Meerschaert et al. 1998). We believe that the new information we obtained with permeabilized neutrophils supports both de novo nucleation and uncapping mechanisms for initiating actin assembly.
Comments Concerning Permeabilized Neutrophils
Permeabilized cells are useful for studying receptor-mediated cytoskeletal changes in hematopoietic cells (Redmond et al. 1994; Hartwig et al. 1995; Sullivan et al. 1999; Weiner et al. 1999). Redmond et al. 1994 demonstrated FMLP-mediated actin assembly in streptolysin-O–permeabilized rabbit neutrophils in the presence of exogenous GTP. In the study, GTP alone produced quantitatively similar actin assembly as GTP and FMLP added together. We report here a coupling of FMLP receptor perturbation to actin assembly in OG-permeabilized neutrophils that does not absolutely require GTP supplementation. We documented actin assembly in response to FMLP using both biochemical and morphological assays. The OG permeabilization method requires precise conditions that, if followed, deliver reproducible results. The technique creates holes in the plasma membrane without extracting receptors or key intermediates on the pathway to actin assembly. It does not liberate the potent elastase of neutrophils, which only treatment of intact cells with diisopropylfluorophosphate can otherwise prevent from damaging cell constituents under investigation (Amrein and Stossel 1980; Weiner et al. 1999). Although we have concentrated on actin nucleation activity in this study, the procedure preserves some neutrophil shape change induced by FMLP stimulation. This approach adds a dimension of biochemical quantitation to the widely used morphological assessment of actin assembly not possible in studies with intact cells probed by microinjection or forced expression of signaling intermediates.
Our findings with OG-permeabilized neutrophils can reconcile some of the contradictions posed by previous studies addressing the regulation of neutrophil in actin assembly. The most likely reason for the inability of added GTPases to induce actin nucleation in some experiments (Kaetanaev and Wymann 1998) was their inactivation by elastase. Arcaro 1998 documented Rac-dependent dissociation of gelsolin-actin complexes, but was unable to inhibit this effect with gelsolin-derived phosphoinsositide-binding peptide. This discrepancy is also explicable if elastase simply degraded the unprotected peptide. In cell extracts cleared of most membranes and cytoskeletal polymers, Cdc42, but not Rac, led to actin polymerization (Zigmond et al. 1997, Zigmond et al. 1998). We find that permeabilized neutrophils, like centrifuged neutrophil extracts, express GTP
S-stimulated cytochalasin B-sensitive actin nucleation activity, and GDPβS inhibits FMLP-induced actin nucleation activity, implicating intermediacy of GTPases. Like the extracts, permeabilized neutrophils develop actin nucleation activity in response to activated Cdc42. Contrasting the findings with cell-free extracts, however, activated Rac also promotes nucleation activity in the permeabilized neutrophils. This outcome is not surprising if one considers that membranes and cytoskeletal scaffoldings are important participants in the reactions coupling receptors to actin remodeling in intact cells. The permeabilized neutrophils presumably have the Cdc42-reactive components expressed in centrifuged extracts, but also have machinery, including FMLP receptors and the apparatus linking them to downstream components. The centrifugation step used to prepare neutrophil extracts probably removes this machinery.
Previously, we noted that stimulation of platelets with thrombin receptor activating peptide exposed far more barbed than pointed ends (Hartwig 1992), and we note the same discrepancy in this study of neutrophils. We now know that a reasonable explanation is that some of the barbed ends arise from actin nucleation by Arp2/3, which yields free barbed, but not free pointed, ends.
Piecing Together the Signaling Pathway from FMLP Receptor to Actin Assembly in Permeabilized Neutrophils
Essential Role of Phosphoinositides in FMLP-inhibited Actin Assembly.
D3 and D4 phosphoinositides promote actin nucleation activity in permeabilized neutrophils, and a gelsolin-derived phosphoinositide-binding peptide fully inhibits FMLP-stimulated actin nucleation. These results mirror the findings with permeabilized platelets that these phosphoinositides also stimulate actin nucleation, and that the gelsolin peptide inhibits thrombin receptor-mediated nucleation (Hartwig et al. 1995). Phosphoinositides can operate at multiple steps in signal transduction (Martin 1998; Hinchcliffe 2000). As in permeabilized platelets, phosphoinositides overcome the inhibition by GDPβS of FMLP receptor-mediated actin nucleation, indicating that the lipids act downstream of GTPase activation (although not excluding a role in upstream regulation as well). Phosphoinositides promote actin polymerization by monomer desequestration from profilin, by dissociating protein caps from actin filament barbed ends (Janmey 1998), by aggregating actin filament barbed ends at the membrane (Machesky et al. 1997), and by activating WASP family proteins (Rohatgi et al. 1999). Therefore, phosphoinositides could be essential intermediates in all actin nucleation pathways.
The Relative Roles of Rac and Cdc42.
Activated Cdc42 strongly induces nucleation activity in permeabilized neutrophils, and a dominant negative Cdc42 construct completely inhibits the effect of FMLP in promoting actin nucleation. Activated Rac's effect on actin nucleation in permeabilized neutrophils is slightly smaller than that of activated Cdc42, and a maximally effective concentration of a dominant negative Rac construct inhibits only about two-thirds of FMLP-stimulated actin nucleation. These results are consistent with Cdc42's being upstream of, and an obligatory intermediate for, Rac in the pathways leading from the FMLP receptor to actin nucleation. The demonstration that dominant negative Rac2 can dampen the activated CDC42-mediated increase in free barbed ends, whereas dominant negative CDC42 does not affect the Rac2-mediated increase in free barbed ends, supports this interpretation. Previous work has shown that Cdc42 activation can secondarily activate Rac in cells, although Rac activation independent of Cdc42 is also possible (Kjøller and Hall 1999). Our findings indicate that, in neutrophils, Cdc42 and Rac represent distinct steps in a branching pathway, bifurcating off of activated Cdc42. The retention of Cdc42 effects in soluble neutrophil extracts with loss of the Rac responsiveness is consistent with these signaling branches residing on different subcellular structures. The effective concentrations of the GTPases (N17Cdc42, N17Rac1, V12Cdc42, and V12Rac1) added to the permeabilized neutrophils are similar to those used in permeabilized platelets previously (Hartwig et al. 1995; Hoffmeister and Hartwig, unpublished results), and by those microinjected into fibroblasts (Nobes and Hall 1999).
The known downstream targets of Cdc42 leading to actin nucleation are the WASP family proteins and the Arp2/3 complex. Peptides derived from the Arp2/3 complex-binding domain of WASP family proteins are useful probes for the WASP-Arp2/3 interaction and are widely believed to inhibit actin nucleation through this nucleation pathway in vitro (Machesky and Insall 1998; Rohatgi et al. 1999). A maximally effective concentration of the N-WASP peptide CA (3 µM) inhibits about two-thirds of the FMLP-induced nucleation activity in permeabilized neutrophils. This amount of peptide is in the same order of magnitude as the ARP2/3 complex in human neutrophils (9.7 µM; Higgs et al. 1999). This result attests to the importance of the Arp2/3 pathway in neutrophils and also points to the existence of a pathway that does not operate through Arp2/3. The data does not exclude a pathway that some have proposed leading from Rac to WASP family proteins (Miki et al. 1998; Machesky and Insall 1999), but implies that this pathway is not the only way that activated Rac leads to actin nucleation.
Rac directly or indirectly promotes the synthesis of polyphosphoinositides (Honda et al. 1999; Tolias et al. 2000). Therefore, the effect of Rac activation on actin nucleation could theoretically be a result of the activation of WASP proteins by polyphosphoinositides. Such a role for Rac in neutrophil actin nucleation is possible. But the retention of substantial actin nucleation activity in the presence of the CA peptide is also consistent with phosphoinositides uncapping actin filament barbed ends in a pathway independent of the Arp2/3 complex. Furthermore, Zigmond et al. 1997 observed stimulation of PI(4)P and PI(4,5)P2 synthesis in neutrophil extracts by Rac, but this phosphoinositide increase did not promote actin nucleation. Conversely, we interpret the substantial, but incomplete, inhibition of FMLP-induced actin nucleation by a dominant negative Rac construct as evidence for an independent limb of the signaling pathway leading directly from Cdc42 to actin nucleation, bypassing Rac. The greater inhibitory effectiveness of the gelsolin-derived phosphoinositide-binding peptide compared with inhibition of Rac activity may be a result of the peptide's ability to block preexisting, as well as newly synthesized, phosphoinositides or because Rac-independent pathways generate phosphoinositides. A recent paper proposed that the Arp2/3 nucleation pathway works by promoting branching actin elongation off the barbed ends of actin filaments (Pantaloni et al. 2000). If so, actin filament barbed end uncapping could contribute importantly to this nucleation mechanism. The complete inhibition of actin nucleation by phosphinositide binding gelsolin peptide and the blocking of half of the actin nucleation by Arp2/3 inhibition in permeabilized FMLP-stimulated neutrophils are consistent with this hypothesis.
Neutrophils from Rac 2 knockout mice do not respond to FMLP with either chemotaxis or new actin assembly (Roberts et al. 1999), implicating an absolute requirement for both signaling arms defined by our results in mouse neutrophils. Possibly, Rac's main contribution is to produce phosphoinositides, obligatorily required for expression of both pathways. Actin polymerization induced by G-CSF or TNF-
is normal in Rac2-null neutrophils, suggesting alternative signaling pathways from these ligands to actin nucleation. On the other hand, Ambruso et al. 2000 have observed that human neutrophils expressing a naturally occurring mutant Rac2 that completely inhibits FMLP-induced superoxide production have impaired, but not absent, actin assembly responses to FMLP. This finding is consistent with our results implicating dual pathways: a Rac-dependent pathway and a Rac-independent pathway in human neutrophils.
In conclusion, all of the evidence we have obtained with permeabilized human neutrophils is summarizable in the scheme shown in Fig. 7. We propose that FMLP receptor ligation activates Cdc42. Activated Cdc42 sets in motion signaling pathways leading through Rac, and presumably phosphoinositide synthesis to actin filament barbed-end uncapping and maximal catalytic activity of WASP family proteins activated by GTP-Cdc42. Active WASP proteins in turn cause the Arp2/3 complex to promote actin nucleation. Compared with the thrombin receptor pathway leading to actin assembly in permeabilized platelets, where Rac and actin filament barbed-end uncapping dominate quantitatively, Cdc42 and Arp2/3 nucleation account for a greater proportion of FMLP-induced actin assembly. Based on experience with the permeabilized platelet system, we anticipate that applying this approach to neutrophils will reveal many variations in the way that signaling from different receptors mobilizes actin assembly.
|
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health grants HL19429 (T.P. Stossel) and HL 56252 (J.H. Hartwig), and a gift from the Edwin S. Webster Foundation. M. Glogauer has a Clinician Scientist Award from the Medical Research Council (Canada).
Submitted: 2 March 2000
Revised: 7 June 2000
Accepted: 23 June 2000
Abbreviations used in this paper: F-actin, filamentous actin; FMLP, N-formyl methionyl leucyl phenylalanine tripeptide; GST, glutathione S-transferase; N-WASP, neural Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome family proteins; OG, n-octyl-β-glucopyranoside; PIP2, phosphatidylinositol bisphosphate.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Akasaki T. Koga H. Sumimoto H. Phosphoinositide 3-kinase-dependent and -independent activation of the small GTPase Rac2 in human neutrophils, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 1999, 18055–18059.
Ambruso D.R. Knall C. Abell A.N. Panepinto J. Kurkchubasche A. Thurman G. Gonzalez-Aller C. Hiester A. deBoer M. Harbeck R.J.. Human neutrophil immunodeficiency syndrome is associated with an inhibitory rac2 mutation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 2597, 2000, 4654–4659.
Amrein P.C. Stossel T.P.. Prevention of degradation of human polymorphonuclear leukocyte proteins by diisopropylfluorophosphate, Blood., 56, 1980, 442–447.
Arcaro A.. The small GTP-binding protein Rac promotes the dissociation of gelsolin from actin filaments in neutrophils, J. Biol. Chem, 273, 1998, 805–813.
Azuma T. Witke W. Stossel T. Hartwig J. Kwiatkowski D.. Gelsolin is a downstream effector of rac for fibroblast motility, EMBO (Eur. Mol. Biol. Organ.) J, 17, 1998, 1362–1370.[Medline]
Barkalow K. Witke W. Kwiatkowski D.J. Hartwig J.H.. Coordinated regulation of platelet actin filament barbed ends by gelsolin and capping protein, J. Cell Biol, 134, 1996, 389–399.
Benard V. Bohl B. Bokoch G.. Characterization of Rac and Cdc42 activation in chemoattractant-stimulated human neutrophils using a novel assay for active GTPases, J. Biol. Chem, 274, 1999, 13198–13204.
Bokoch G.. Chemoattractant signaling and leukocyte activation, Blood., 86, 1995, 1649–1660.
Cassimeris L. MacNeill H. Zigmond S.. Chemoattractant-stimulated polymorphonuclear leukocytes contain two populations of actin filaments that differ in their spatial distributions and relative stabilities, J. Cell Biol., 110, 1990, 1067–1075.
Devreotis P. Zigmond S.. Chemotaxis in eukaryotic cellsa focus on leukocytes and Dictyostelium, Ann. Rev. Cell Biol, 4, 1988, 649–686.
Downey G. Chan C. Trudel S. Grinstein S.. Actin assembly in electropermeabilized neutrophilsrole of intracellular calcium, J. Cell Biol, 110, 1990, 1975–1982.
Gallin J.I. Holland S.. Disorders of phagocytic cells, Gallin J.I. Snyderman R., Inflammation Basic Principles and Clinical Correlates, 1999, 895–914 Lippincott New York.
Gao J.-L. Lee E. Murphy P. Impaired antibacterial host defense in mice lacking the N-formylpeptide receptor, J. Exp. Med., 189, 1999, 657–662.
Gerard C. Gerard N.P.. C5A anaphylatoxin and its seven transmembrane-segment receptor, Annu. Rev. Immunol., 12, 1994, 775–808.[Medline]
Hall A.. Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton, Science, 279, 1998, 509–514.
Hartwig J.. Mechanisms of actin rearrangements mediating platelet activation, J. Cell Biol, 118, 1992, 1421–1442.
Hartwig J. DeSisto M.. The cytoskeleton of the resting human blood plateletstructure of the membrane skeleton and its attachment to actin filaments, J. Cell Biol, 112, 1991, 407–425.
Hartwig J.H. Shevlin P.. The architecture of actin filaments and the ultrastructural location of actin-binding protein in the periphery of lung macrophages, J. Cell Biol., 103, 1991, 1007–1020.[Medline]
Hartwig J. Bokoch G. Carpenter C. Janmey P. Taylor L. Toker A. Stossel T.. Thrombin receptor ligation and activated rac uncap actin filament barbed ends through phosphoinositide synthesis in permeabilized platelets, Cell, 82, 1995, 643–653.[Medline]
Higgs H. Pollard T.. Regulation of actin polymerization by Arp2/3 complex and WASp/SCAR proteins, J. Biol. Chem, 274, 1999, 32531–32534.
Higgs H.N. Blanchoin L. Pollard T.D.. Influence of the C terminus of Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein WASp and the Arp2/3 complex on actin polymerization, Biochem, 38, 1999, 15212–15222.[Medline]
Hinchcliffe K.. Is PIP2 a messenger too?, Curr. Biol., 10, 2000, R104–R105.[Medline]
Honda A. Nogami M. Yokezeki T. Yamazaki M. Nakamura H. Watanabe H. Kawamoto K. Nakayama K. Morris A. Frohman M. Kanaho Y.. Phosphatidylinositol 4-phosphate 5-kinase a is a downstream effector of the small G protein ARF6 in membrane ruffle formation, Cell., 99, 1999, 521–532.[Medline]
Howard T. Oresajo C.. The kinetics of chemotactic peptide-induced change in F-actin content, F-actin distribution, and the shape of neutrophils, J. Cell Biol., 101, 1985, 1078–1085.
Janmey P.. The cytoskeleton and cell signalingcomponent localization and mechanical coupling, Physiol Rev., 78, 1998, 763–781.
Janmey P.A. Stossel T.P.. Gelsolin-polyphosphoinositide interaction. Full expression of gelsolin-inhibiting function by polyphosphoinositides in vesicular form and inactivation by dilution, aggregation, or masking of the inositol head group, J. Biol. Chem., 264, 1989, 4825–4831.
Janmey P. Lamb J. Allen P. Matsudaira P.. Phosphoinositide-binding peptides derived from the sequences of gelsolin and villin, J. Biol. Chem., 267, 1992, 11818–11823.
Kaetanaev V. Wymann M.. GTPgS-induced actin polymerisation in vitroATP- and phosphoinotiside-independent signaling via Rho-family proteins and a plasma membrane-associated guanine nucleotide exchange factor, J. Cell Sci., 111, 1998, 1583–1594.[Abstract]
Kjøller L. Hall A.. Signaling to Rho GTPases, Exp. Cell. Res, 253, 1999, 166–179.[Medline]
Machesky L. Insall R.. Scar1 and the related Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein, WASP, regulate the actin cytoskeleton through the Arp2/3 complex, Curr. Biol., 8, 1998, 1347–1356.[Medline]
Machesky L.M. Insall R.H.. Signaling to actin dynamics, J. Cell Biol., 146, 1999, 267–272.
Machesky L.M. Reeves E. Wientjes F. Mattheyse F.J. Grogan A. Totty N.F. Burlingame A.L. Hsuan J.J. Segal A.W.. Mammalian actin-related protein 2/3 complex localizes to regions of lamellipodial protrusion and is composed of evolutionarily conserved proteins, Biochem. J., 328, 1997, 105–112.[Medline]
Martin T.. Phosphoinositide lipids as signaling moleculescommon themes for signal transduction, cytoskeletal regulation and membrane trafficking, Ann. Rev. Dev. Biol., 14, 1998, 231–264.[Medline]
Meerschaert K. De Corte V. De Ville Y. Vandekerckhove J. Gettemans J.. Gelsolin and functionally similar actin-binding proteins are regulated by lysophosphatidic acid, EMBO (Eur. Mol. Biol. Organ.) J., 17, 1998, 5923–5932.[Medline]
Miki H. Suitsugu S. Takenawa T.. WAVE, a novel WASP family protein involved in actin reorganization induced by Rac, EMBO (Eur. Mol. Biol. Organ.) J., 17, 1998, 6932–6941.[Medline]
Nobes C. Hall A.. Rho GTPases control polarity, protrusion, and adhesion during cell movement, J. Cell Biol., 144, 1999, 1235–1244.
Pantaloni D. Boujemaa R. Didry D. Gounon P. Carlier M.F.. The Arp2/3 complex branches filament barbed endsfunctional antagonism with capping proteins, Nat. Cell Biol., 2000. 2, 2000, 385–391.[Medline]
Redmond T. Tardif M. Zigmond S.. Induction of actin polymerization in permeabilized neutrophils, J. Biol. Chem, 269, 1994, 21657–21663.
Roberts A. Kim C. Zhen L. Lowe J. Kapur R. Petryniak B. Spaetti A. Pollock J. Borneo J. Bradford G.. Deficiency of the hematopoietic cell-specific Rho family GTPase Rac2 is characterized by abnormalities in neutrophil function and host defense, Immunity, 10, 1999, 183–196.[Medline]
Rohatgi R. Ma L. Miki H. Lopez M. Kirchhausen T. Takenawa T. Kirschner M.. The interaction between N-WASP and the Arp2/3 complex links Cdc42-dependent signals to actin assembly, Cell., 97, 1999, 221–231.[Medline]
Särndal E. Lindroth M. Bengtsson T. Fällman M. Gustavsson J. Stendahl O. Andersson T.. Association of ligand-receptor complexes with actin filaments in human neutrophilsa possible regulatory role for a G-protein, J. Cell Biol, 109, 1989, 2791–2799.
Schiffmann E. Corcoran B. Wahl S.. N-formylmethionyl peptides as chemoattractants for leucocytes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 72, 1975, 1059–1062.
Schliwa M. Van Blerkom J.. Structural interactions of cytoskeletal components, J. Cell Biol, 90, 1981, 225–235.
Sullivan R. Price L. Koffer A.. Rho controls cortical F-actin disassembly in addition to, but independently of, secretion in mast cells, J. Biol. Chem., 274, 1999, 38140–38146.
Tolias K. Hartwig J. Ishihara H. Shibasaki Y. Cantley L. Carpenter C.. Type 1a phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase mediates Rac-dependent actin assembly, Curr. Biol., 10, 2000, 153–156.[Medline]
Weiner O. Servant G. Welch M. Mitchison T. Sedat J. Bourne H.. Spatial control of actin polymerization during neutrophil chemotaxis, Nat. Cell Biol, 1, 1999, 75–81.[Medline]
Welch M.. The world according to Arpregulation of actin nucleation by the Arp2/3 complex, Trends Cell Biol, 9, 1999, 423–427.[Medline]
Witke W. Sharpe A. Hartwig J. Azuma T. Stossel T. Kwiatkowski D.. Hemostatic, inflammatory and fibroblast responses are blunted in mice lacking gelsolin, Cell, 81, 1995, 41–51.[Medline]
Zigmond S. Joyce M. Borleis J. Bokoch G. Devreotis P.. Regulation of actin polymerization in cell-free systems by GTPgS and Cdc42, J. Cell Biol, 138, 1997, 363–374.
Zigmond S. Joyce M. Yang C. Brown K. Huang M. Pring M.. Mechanism of Cdc42-induced actin polymerization in neutrophil extracts, J. Cell Biol, 142, 1998, 1001–1012.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|