|
||
© The Rockefeller University Press,
0021-9525/2000//519 $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 151, Number 3,
, 2000 519-528
Original Article |
Autophagic Tubes
: Vacuolar Invaginations Involved in Lateral Membrane Sorting and Inverse Vesicle Budding
b Fachbereich Biologie, 78457 Konstanz, Germany
c Max-Planck-Institut für Entwicklungsbiologie, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
Friedrich-Miescher-Laboratorium der Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Spemannstrasse 37-39, 72076 Tübingen, Germany.49-7071-60145549-7071-601850
Many intracellular compartments of eukaryotic cells do not adopt a spherical shape, which would be expected in the absence of mechanisms organizing their structure. However, little is known about the principles determining the shape of organelles. We have observed very defined structural changes of vacuoles, the lysosome equivalents of yeast. The vacuolar membrane can form a large tubular invagination from which vesicles bud off into the lumen of the organelle. Formation of the tube is regulated via the Apg/Aut pathway. Its lumen is continuous with the cytosol, making this inverse budding reaction equivalent to microautophagocytosis. The tube is highly dynamic, often branched, and defined by a sharp kink of the vacuolar membrane at the site of invagination. The tube is formed by vacuoles in an autonomous fashion. It persists after vacuole isolation and, therefore, is independent of surrounding cytoskeleton. There is a striking lateral heterogeneity along the tube, with a high density of transmembrane particles at the base and a smooth zone devoid of transmembrane particles at the tip where budding occurs. We postulate a lateral sorting mechanism along the tube that mediates a depletion of large transmembrane proteins at the tip and results in the inverse budding of lipid-rich vesicles into the lumen of the organelle.
Key Words: microautophagocytosis lysosome yeast proteolysis budding
© 2000 The Rockefeller University Press
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Lysosomes are dynamic organelles capable of protein uptake from the cytosol along various routes. They can translocate proteins directly through their membrane (Cuervo and Dice 1998; Horst et al. 1999), in a similar fashion as mitochondria or the ER. In addition, they take up proteins, or even entire organelles, by means of various vesicle-mediated processes: biosynthetic transport from the Golgi complex via the carboxypeptidase Y (CPY) and alkaline phosphatase (Alp) pathways (Wendland et al. 1998), the vacuolar import and degradation (Vid), cytoplasm to vacuole targeting (Cvt), and autophagocytosis pathways. The Vid pathway is involved in catabolite inactivation of fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase in yeast (Chiang and Schekman 1991; Huang and Chiang 1997). The protein is imported into dedicated Vid vesicles which then transfer it to vacuoles. The Cvt pathway is responsible for the transport of aminopeptidase I into vacuoles (Scott and Klionsky 1998). It operates via the formation of small double layered vesicles in the cytosol (Scott et al. 1997). These vesicles sequester aminopeptidase I and fuse with the vacuole.
Autophagocytosis is a nonselective mechanism of transferring cytosolic proteins or organelles into lysosomes (Seglen and Bohley 1992). It operates at a constitutive level, but can be induced under conditions of stress, such as nutrient limitation, or in redifferentiation and cell death. Two different forms can be observed: macro- and microautophagocytosis. Macroautophagocytosis occurs through the formation of autophagosomes, which are specialized vesicles with double or multiple boundary membranes (Seglen and Bohley 1992; Scott and Klionsky 1998). During their formation, these vesicles engulf portions of cytosol or organelles such as peroxisomes. Their outer membrane fuses with lysosomes.Then, the inner membranes with their cytosolic contents (termed autophagic bodies) are degraded. The gene products required for the formation of autophagosomes largely overlap with those involved in forming Cvt vesicles (Harding et al. 1996; Scott et al. 1996). However, different sets of components are involved in fusing autophagosomes and Cvt vesicles with vacuoles (Darsow et al. 1997; Abeliovich et al. 1999). The origin of autophagosomes is unclear. The ER, the Golgi complex, and specialized structures called phagophores have been proposed as precursors (Pfeifer 1972; Seglen 1987; Dunn 1990; Yamamoto et al. 1990a,Yamamoto et al. 1990b). Microautophagocytosis operates via direct invagination of lysosomes, leading to the formation of single membrane- bounded vesicles in the lysosomal lumen that are rapidly degraded (Seglen and Bohley 1992). Also, this pathway can transfer organelles into lysosomes, as shown extensively for peroxisomes (Veenhuis et al. 1983; Tuttle et al. 1993; Tuttle and Dunn 1995; Sakai et al. 1998). Though genetic screens have revealed many genes involved in macroautophagocytosis and in peroxisome degradation (Tsukada and Ohsumi 1993; Thumm et al. 1994; Titorenko et al. 1995; Sakai et al. 1998; Yuan et al. 1999), much less is known about microautophagocytosis. Mutants selectively affecting this process are not available and in Saccharomyces a microautophagic pathway has not even been defined.
Here, we have investigated the structural dynamics of the yeast vacuole. We describe invagination processes of the vacuolar membrane and identify a novel differentiation of the vacuolar membrane, autophagic tubes. We propose that autophagic tubes are dedicated to the lateral sorting of proteins and lipids in the plane of the membrane, and thereby facilitate vesicle budding into the lumen of the vacuole.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1::TRP ade3::HIS3::CMD1 (David Botstein, Stanford University, Stanford, CA); BJ3505 (MATa HIS3 lys2-208 trp1-
101 ura3-52 gal2 can1 pep4::HIS3 prb1-
1.6R) (Elizabeth Jones, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA); DBY5734-16 (MATa pep4
::LEU2; ade2; lys2; his3; trp1; leu2; ura3;cmd1-
1::TRP; ade3::HIS3::CMD1) (Sattler and Mayer 2000, this issue); and CRY1 (MATa ade2-1oc can1-100 his3-11,15 leu2-3,112 trp1-1 ura3-1) (Trisha Davis, University of Washington, Seattle, WA). CRY1 was used for experiments involving in vivo fluorescence labeling with FM4-64 because it has larger vacuoles and virtually all cells contain only one vacuole. YTS1, YTS3, and YTS5 have been described in Sattler and Mayer 2000(this issue). YTS7 (
apg7) was created in DBY5734 in the same manner using the primers 5'-TTC ATT ATA TTT CAA CAA ATA TAA GAT AAT CAA GAA TAA ACA GCT GAA GCT TCG TAC GC-3' and 5'-TGG CAC CAC AAT ATG TAC CAA TGC TAT TAT ATG CAA AAT AGC ATA GGC CAC TAG TGG ATC TG-3.
Growth of Cells
Yeast cells were precultured in YPD (1% yeast extract, 2% Bacto peptone, 2% glucose) for 6–8 h at 30°C and then diluted for logarithmic overnight growth (14–16 h, 30°C, 225 rpm) in 100-ml Erlenmeyer flasks with 30 ml of YPD medium. For starving cells, overnight cultures were harvested at an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 2, centrifuged (4 min, 4°C, 3,800 g, JLA 10.500 rotor), washed with sterile water, resuspended in 30 ml of SD(–N) (0.67% Difco yeast nitrogen base without amino acids and without ammonium sulfate, 2% glucose), and incubated (up to 3 h, 30°C, 225 rpm).
Staining of Vacuoles In Vivo
All media were supplemented with 60 mg/liter adenine sulfate. Cells were grown logarithmically in 5 ml of YPD overnight (20-ml tubes, 30°C, 225 rpm). They were reisolated (2 min, 1,300 g, 4°C), washed with deionized water, reisolated, and resuspended to an OD600 of 0.5–1 in YPD or SD(–N) medium. If desired, the cells were cultivated in these media for up to 3 h. Then, 1 ml of the suspension was supplemented with 20 µM FM4-64 (Molecular Probes) and incubated for 1 h, as described above. The cells were harvested (2 min, 1,300 g, 4°C), washed with 1 ml medium, pelleted as described above, resuspended in 1 ml medium without stain, and incubated for at least 30 min in the shaker. When samples were drawn, the cells were immediately chilled on ice, reisolated (2 min, 1,300 g, 4°C), and resuspended in medium at an OD600 of 3–5. 7 µl of the suspension was mixed with 7 µl of 0.4% Seaplaque agarose in 10 mM Pipes/KOH, pH 6.8, 200 mM sorbitol (kept liquid at 35°C). 12 µl of this mixture was transferred to a slide, covered immediately with a coverslip, and chilled at 4°C for 5 min to immobilize the cells. Then, the cells were investigated with a confocal microscope (Leica TCS) or a conventional fluorescence microscope. The intensity of illumination was minimized to avoid structural damage to the vacuoles that can occur at higher light intensities or after prolonged illumination of the same field. For confocal analysis, two to four images of a field were taken and averaged.
Thin Section EM
Yeast cells were cryofixed using a propane-jet freezing device (JFD 030, Bal-Tec; Balzers AG) and freeze-substituted either in 0.5% uranyl acetate in ethanol or in 0.5% osmium tetroxide and 0.5% glutaraldehyde in acetone at –90°C for 35 h, at –60°C for 4 h, and –50°C for 2 h in a freeze-substitution unit (FSU 010, Bal-Tec; Balzers AG). After washing with ethanol at –35°C or acetone at –20°C, the samples were either infiltrated with Lowicryl HM20 and UV-polymerized at –35°C for 48 h or infiltrated with Epon and polymerized at 60°C for 48 h. Ultrathin sections stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate were viewed in a Philips CM10 electron microscope.
Freeze–Fracture Analysis
Living yeast cells or isolated vacuoles were sandwiched between thin copper sheets (Bal-Tec; Balzers AG), mounted on tweezers, and rapidly injected into melting propane (–185°C), as described previously (Gulik-Krzywicki and Costello 1978). The sandwiches were inserted under liquid nitrogen into a freeze–fracture unit Type BAF 300 (Balzers AG), fractured at –100°C, and replicated by 45° platinum-carbon shadowing. Replicas were transferred into 2.5% SDS with 30 mM sucrose in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer, pH 8.3. After vigorous shaking for 30 min, replicas were washed several times with distilled water and mounted onto copper grids for routine EM analysis in an EM 10 (ZEISS).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
|
What determines the formation and structure of autophagic tubes? To address this, we also detected autophagic tubes in vacuoles that had been extracted from the cells, floated in density gradients, fast frozen, and freeze–fractured (Fig. 5). The tubes found were indistinguishable from those seen in vivo. They had the same diameter, were sometimes branched, and carried expanded termini. Also, the sharp bending of the membrane at the neck of the tube and its constriction were maintained (Fig. 5). Since authentic autophagic tubes were able to be detected after extracting the organelle from the cell, their maintenance cannot depend on an intact surrounding cytoskeletal framework. This is further supported by the observation that purified vacuoles can even form new tubes in a cell-free system (Sattler and Mayer 2000, this issue). Therefore, we conclude that autophagic tubes are formed and maintained by the vacuolar membrane autonomously, independent of an intact cellular environment.
|
|
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
What is the function of autophagic tubes and of the microautophagic pathway, in general? Microautophagocytosis can transfer cytosol and organelles into the vacuole. However, both functions are also performed by the macroautophagic pathway. For peroxisome uptake, the balance between micro- and macroautophagocytosis is influenced by the growth conditions (Tuttle et al. 1993; Tuttle and Dunn 1995). However, the situation is less clear for autophagocytosis of soluble cytosolic components. Could the main purpose of microautophagocytosis be fundamentally distinct from that of the macroautophagic pathway, that is, could the transfer of soluble cytosolic components by microautophagocytosis not be its main purpose? There are several possibilities. The degradation of membrane proteins might be one function of microautophagocytosis. Many transporters or receptors from the plasma membrane can become endocytosed and then degraded in vacuoles or lysosomes (Wendland et al. 1998). Although their degradation often depends on vacuolar proteases, in many cases it is unclear how degradation actually occurs. Membrane proteins could be directly transported to the vacuolar membrane by vesicular trafficking. There, they could be invaginated into the vacuolar lumen by microautophagocytosis and then degraded with the resulting autophagic bodies. These membrane proteins would have to be able to diffuse into the smooth areas of autophagic tubes, sorting them away from genuine vacuolar membrane proteins, which are excluded from these zones. Such a pathway would be functionally equivalent to the multivesicular body pathway, the invagination of endosomes, which is known to transfer membrane proteins into the lumen of endosomes. Multivesicular endosomes then fuse with vacuoles, delivering their internal vesicles into the vacuolar lumen for degradation (Odorizzi et al. 1998; Wurmser and Emr 1998).
A major function of autophagic tubes may be the maintenance of membrane homeostasis of vacuoles and the regulation of their size. Although vacuoles are the destination of numerous routes of vesicular trafficking (Scott and Klionsky 1998; Wendland et al. 1998), only one example for membrane retrieval from the vacuole has been found (Bryant et al. 1998). Therefore, vacuoles and lysosomes may face considerable membrane influx in the absence of compensatory membrane efflux. This effect would be strongly enhanced under conditions of starvation. Macroautophagocytosis leads to a large membrane influx resulting from the fusion of vacuoles with the outer membrane of autophagosomes. The autophagosomal outer membrane also has an unusual ultrastructure and is poor in intramembranous particles (Takeshige et al. 1992; Baba et al. 1994, Baba et al. 1995). Accordingly, starvation leads to an increase in vacuolar size and a dilution of intramembranous particles of the vacuolar membrane (Baba et al. 1995). Therefore, there must be a compensatory mechanism that prevents the vacuolar membrane from expanding rapidly. We propose that microautophagy performs this function and guarantees membrane homeostasis. It removes membrane and, as our results show, probably lipid-rich pieces from the vacuolar surface and transfers it into the lumen for degradation. The membrane, which buds into the lumen of the vacuole, is ultrastructurally very similar to that added to the vacuoles by fusion with the outer autophagosomal membrane. The observed lateral exclusion of large transmembrane proteins from the zones of inverse budding prevents genuine vacuolar membrane components from being turned over. Therefore, we propose that microautophagic budding events may help to regulate the size and the protein to lipid ratio of the vacuole, particularly if macroautophagocytosis is induced. To achieve membrane homeostasis, the rate of microautophagic membrane invagination must equal the rate of macroautophagic membrane influx. Then, about half of the autophagic bodies should be of microautophagic origin.
This hypothesis can also accommodate previous observations by other groups. Our microscopic analysis indicated that the size and membrane structure of autophagic bodies formed by microautophagocyosis resemble those of macroautophagosomes (Baba et al. 1994, Baba et al. 1995). This means that, once formed, an autophagic body cannot be morphologically distinguished if it arose from a micro or macroautophagic reaction. Are both pathways also functionally interconnected? If macro- and microautophagocytosis were independent pathways, microautophagic bodies should still accumulate when the macroautophagic pathway is blocked. However, a temperature-sensitive mutant of the target-soluble NSF attachment protein receptor (t-SNARE) Vam3p, which forms macroautophagosomes, but cannot fuse them with the vacuole, was reported not to show any autophagic bodies in the vacuolar lumen at restrictive temperature (Darsow et al. 1997). Likewise, the Aut/Apg mutants, which do not form autophagosomes efficiently (Scott and Klionsky 1998), showed a severe reduction of autophagic tubes (Fig. 4) and do not accumulate autophagic bodies. Therefore, microautophagocytosis seems to depend on macroautophagocytosis. Our favored interpretation is that the fusion of the outer membrane of macroautophagosomes with vacuoles is needed to supply the vacuole with excess membrane as a substrate for microautophagic vacuole invagination. This means that repeated microautophagic membrane invagination is inseparably connected to macroautophagic membrane influx in vivo.
A shortage of source membrane for invagination might even explain the defect of autophagy mutants in peroxisome degradation (Hutchins et al. 1999), specifically of the Gsa7 mutant on microautophagy of peroxisomes (Yuan et al. 1999). P. pastoris Gsa7 is homologous to Apg7 of S. cerevisiae (Kim et al. 1999; Yuan et al. 1999), which is part of the protein conjugation system that is also involved in macroautophagocytosis (Mizushima et al. 1999; Tanida et al. 1999) and autophagic tube formation. Microautophagy of peroxisomes consumes a large portion of the vacuolar membrane and must require some compensation by influx of new membrane. An Apg7-dependent induction of the macroautophagic pathway may be necessary to compensate for this loss of vacuolar membrane. In the absence of Gsa7/Apg7-dependent compensation, the shortage of vacuolar membrane may lead to the accumulation of intermediates. Peroxisomes still may be partially enwrapped by vacuoles, but the invagination may not be closed to complete uptake if the available vacuolar membrane surface is not large enough. This is consistent with the phenotype of Gsa7 mutants described by Yuan et al. 1999. We want to stress that the interdependence of the different autophagic routes via membrane supply, which we proposed above and considered as one important connection, does, by no means, exclude additional direct roles of the Apg/Aut components in all of these pathways, as discussed in other studies (Mizushima et al. 1999; Yuan et al. 1999; Sattler and Mayer 2000, this issue).
The peculiar appearance of autophagic tubes raises the question of how such a structure could be organized. One possibility is that the invaginations are caused by cytoskeletal filaments pushing into the vacuole. This seems unlikely for several reasons. (a) Autophagic tubes are also found in vacuoles that were isolated via flotation gradients and are thus devoid of external cytoskeletal network. (b) These isolated vacuoles are even capable of forming new autophagic tubes in vitro (Sattler and Mayer 2000, this issue). (c) Autophagic tubes often display a striking constriction at the neck of the tube, that is, at the interface between the tube and the vacuolar boundary membrane. (d) Autophagic tubes often differentiate into a series of bubble-like structures and form branches. (e) Finally, we found that transmembrane particles are sorted along the tube, resulting in virtually particle-free areas at the tips. It is not obvious how a penetrating filament may cause these diverse and very specific effects.
We were not able to detect any indications of organization on the membrane, other than the lateral segregation into protein-rich and protein-poor areas. There were no signs of ordered arrangements of transmembrane particles, which hints at the presence of organizing larger molecules on the surface of the membrane, or at the formation of paracrystalline areas by lateral aggregation of proteins. Therefore, we currently favor the view that sorting along the tube may be a lipid-mediated process. There is accumulating evidence that domains can form within membranes and that lipids play an important role in organizing them (Brown and London 1998). Moreover, an unusual lipid, lysobisphosphatidic acid, is enriched in the internal membranes of multivesicular endosomes (Kobayashi et al. 1998). It is still unclear, though, whether this lipid plays an active part in the invagination of endosomes. Given that the invagination of vacuoles is topologically the same reaction as that of endosomes and that the membrane of the nascent vesicles is devoid of transmembrane particles, it is tempting to speculate that lipids might be an important determinant of the budding reaction. Then, scission of the vesicle, which is topologically a homotypic fusion reaction between opposing vacuolar membranes in the autophagic tube, also may be independent of the established enzymes involved in homotypic vacuolar fusion and membrane trafficking, in general. This was in fact observed. Vesicle budding into the vacuolar lumen was found to occur independent of the vacuolar SNARE proteins Vam3p, Vam7p, and Nyv1p, and of Sec18p (yeast NSF) and Sec17p (yeast
-SNAP; Sattler and Mayer 2000, this issue).
In any event, the formation of autophagic tubes and the inverse budding reaction must follow novel and unusual mechanisms, because they are topologically different from other vesiculation processes and yield vesicles with a unique membrane structure. A cell-free system that reconstitutes the formation of autophagic tubes, as well as the budding of vesicles into the lumen of the vacuoles (Sattler and Mayer 2000, this issue), will be a valuable tool for the further characterization of this reaction.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported by grants from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 446; A. Mayer), from Boehringer Ingelheim Foundation (A. Mayer), and the Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds (O. Müller).
Abbreviations used in this paper: Apg and Aut, autophagocytosis; Cvt, cytoplasm to vacuole targeting; EF, extraplasmic fracture face; Vid, vacuolar import and degradation.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Abeliovich H., Darsow T. & Emr S.D.. Cytoplasm to vacuole trafficking of aminopeptidase I requires a t-SNARE-Sec1p complex composed of Tlg2p and Vps45, EMBO (Eur. Mol. Biol. Organ.) J., 18, 1999, 6005–6016.[Medline]
Baba M., Takeshige K., Baba N. & Ohsumi Y.. Ultrastructural analysis of the autophagic process in yeastdetection of autophagosomes and their characterization, J. Cell Biol., 124, 1994, 903–913.
Baba M., Osumi M. & Ohsumi Y.. Analysis of the membrane structures involved in autophagy in yeast by freeze-replica method, Cell Struct. Funct., 20, 1995, 465–471.[Medline]
Brown D.A. & London E.. Functions of lipid rafts in biological membranes, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 14, 1998, 111–136.[Medline]
Bryant N.J., Piper R.C., Weisman L.S. & Stevens T.H.. Retrograde traffic out of the yeast vacuole to the TGN occurs via the prevacuolar/endosomal compartment, J. Cell Biol., 142, 1998, 651–663.
Chiang H.L. & Schekman R.. Regulated import and degradation of a cytosolic protein in the yeast vacuole, Nature., 350, 1991, 313–318.[Medline]
Cuervo A.M. & Dice J.F.. Lysosomes, a meeting point of proteins, chaperones, and proteases, J. Mol. Med., 76, 1998, 6–12.[Medline]
Dabora S.L. & Sheetz M.P.. The microtubule-dependent formation of a tubulovesicular network with characteristics of the ER from cultured cell extracts, Cell., 54, 1988, 27–35.[Medline]
Dai J. & Sheetz M.P.. Regulation of endocytosis, exocytosis, and shape by membrane tension, Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol., 60, 1995, 567–571.
Darsow T., Rieder S.K. & Emr S.D.. A multispecificity syntaxin homologue, Vam3p, essential for autophagic and biosynthetic protein transport to the vacuole, J. Cell Biol., 138, 1997, 517–529.
Dunn W.A. Jr.. Studies on the mechanisms of autophagyformation of the autophagic vacuole, J. Cell Biol., 110, 1990, 1923–1933.
Gulik-Krzywicki T. & Costello M.J.. The use of low temperature x-ray diffraction to evaluate freezing methods used in freeze–fracture electron microscopy, J. Microsc., 112, 1978, 103–114.[Medline]
Harding T.M., Hefner-Gravink A., Thumm M. & Klionsky D.J.. Genetic and phenotypic overlap between autophagy and the cytoplasm to vacuole protein targeting pathway, J. Biol. Chem., 271, 1996, 17621–17624.
Hermann G.J. & Shaw J.M.. Mitochondrial dynamics in yeast, Ann. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 14, 1998, 265–303.[Medline]
Heuser J.E.. Mechanisms behind the organization of membranous organelles in cells, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 1, 1989, 98–102.[Medline]
Horst M., Knecht E.C. & Schu P.V.. Import into and degradation of cytosolic proteins by isolated yeast vacuoles, Mol. Biol. Cell., 10, 1999, 2879–2889.
Huang P.H. & Chiang H.L.. Identification of novel vesicles in the cytosol to vacuole protein degradation pathway, J. Cell Biol., 136, 1997, 803–810.
Hutchins M., Veenhuis M. & Klionsky D.J.. Peroxisome degradation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is dependent on machinery of macroautophagy and the Cvt pathway, J. Cell Sci., 112, 1999, 4079–4087.[Abstract]
Kachar B., Bridgman P.C. & Reese T.S.. Dynamic shape changes of cytoplasmic organelles translocating along microtubules, J. Cell Biol., 105, 1987, 1267–1272.
Kim J., Dalton V., Eggerton K.P., Scott S.V. & Klionsky D.J.. Apg7p/Cvt2p is required for the cytoplasm-to-vacuole targeting, macroautophagy, and peroxisome degradation pathways, Mol. Biol. Cell., 10, 1999, 1337–1351.
Kobayashi T., Stang E., Fang K.S., Demoerloose P., Parton R.G. & Gruenberg J.. A lipid associated with the antiphospholipid syndrome regulates endosome structure and function, Nature., 392, 1998, 193–197.[Medline]
Lee C. & Chen L.B.. Dynamic behaviour of endoplasmic reticulum in living cells, Cell., 54, 1988, 37–46.[Medline]
Mizushima N., Noda T. & Ohsumi Y.. Apg16p is required for the function of the Apg12p–Apg5p conjugate in the yeast autopathagy pathway, EMBO (Eur. Mol. Biol. Organ.) J., 18, 1999, 3888–3896.[Medline]
Odorizzi G., Babst M. & Emr S.D.. Fab1p PtdIns(3)P 5-kinase function essential for protein sorting in the multivesicular body, Cell., 95, 1998, 847–858.[Medline]
Pfeifer U.. Morphologische und funktionelle Aspekte der cellulären Autophagie, Acta Morphol. Acad. Sci. Hung., 20, 1972, 247–267.[Medline]
Plattner H. & Zingsheim H.-P.. Electron microscopic methods in cellular and molecular biology, Subcell. Biochem., 9, 1983, 1–236.[Medline]
Sakai Y., Koller A., Rangell L.K., Keller G.A. & Subramani S.. Peroxisome degradation in Pichia pastorisidentification of specific steps and morphological intermediates, J. Cell Biol., 141, 1998, 625–636.
Sattler T. & Mayer A.. Cell-free reconstitution of microautophagic vacuole invagination and vesicle formation, J. Cell Biol., 151, 2000, 529–538.
Schekman R. & Orci L.. Coat proteins and vesicle budding, Science., 271, 1996, 1526–1533.[Abstract]
Scott S.V. & Klionsky D.J.. Delivery of proteins and organelles to the vacuole from the cytoplasm, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 10, 1998, 523–529.[Medline]
Scott S.V., Hefner-Gravink A., Morano K.A., Noda T., Ohsumi Y. & Klionsky D.J.. Cytoplasm-to-vacuole targeting and autophagy employ the same machinery to deliver proteins to the yeast vacuole, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 93, 1996, 12304–12308.
Scott S.V., Baba M., Ohsumi Y. & Klionsky D.J.. Aminopeptidase I is targeted to the vacuole by a nonclassical vesicular mechanism, J. Cell Biol., 138, 1997, 37–44.
Seglen P.O.. Regulation of autophagic protein degradation in isolated liver cells, Glaumann H. & Ballard F.J., LysosomesTheir Role in Protein Breakdown, 1987, 339–414, Academic Press, London.
Seglen P.O. & Bohley P.. Autophagy and other vacuolar protein degradation mechanisms, Experientia., 48, 1992, 158–172.[Medline]
Takeshige K., Baba M., Tsuboi S., Noda T. & Ohsumi Y.. Autophagy in yeast demonstrated with proteinase-deficient mutants and conditions for its induction, J. Cell Biol., 119, 1992, 301–311.
Tanida I., Mizushima N., Kiyooka M., Ohsumi M., Ueno T., Ohsumi Y. & Kominami E.. Apg7/Cvt2pa novel protein-activating enzyme essential for autophagy, Mol. Biol. Cell., 10, 1999, 1367–1379.
Thumm M., Egner R., Koch B., Schlumpberger M., Straub M., Veenhuis M. & Wolf D.H.. Isolation of autophagocytosis mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, FEBS Lett., 349, 1994, 275–280.[Medline]
Titorenko V.I., Keizer I., Harder W. & Veenhuis M.. Isolation and characterization of mutants impaired in the selective degradation of peroxisomes in the yeast Hansenula polymorpha, J. Baceriol., 177, 1995, 357–363.
Tsukada M. & Ohsumi Y.. Isolation and characterization of autophagy-defective mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, FEBS Lett., 333, 1993, 168–174.
Tuttle D.L. & Dunn W.A. Jr.. Divergent modes of autophagy in the methylotrophic yeast Pichia pastoris, J. Cell Sci., 108, 1995, 25–35.[Abstract]
Tuttle D.L., Lewin A.S. & Dunn W.A. Jr.. Selective autophagy of peroxisomes in methylotrophic yeasts, Eur. J. Biochem., 60, 1993, 283–290.
Veenhuis M., Douma A., Harder W. & Osumi M.. Degradation and turnover of peroxisomes in the yeast Hansenula polymorpha induced by selective inactivation of peroxisomal enzymes, Arch. Microbiol., 134, 1983, 193–203.[Medline]
Vida T. & Emr S.D.. A new vital stain for visualizing vacuolar membrane dynamics and endocytosis in yeast, J. Cell Biol., 128, 1995, 779–792.
Wada Y., Ohsumi Y. & Anraku Y.. Genes for directing vacuolar morphogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, J. Biol. Chem., 267, 1992, 18665–18670.
Warren G. & Malhotra V.. The organization of the Golgi apparatus, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 10, 1998, 493–498.[Medline]
Warren G. & Wickner W.. Organelle inheritance, Cell., 84, 1996, 395–400.[Medline]
Wendland B., Emr S.D. & Riezman H.. Protein traffic in the yeast endocytic and vacuolar protein sorting pathways, Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 10, 1998, 513–522.[Medline]
Wurmser A.E. & Emr S.D.. Phosphoinositide signaling and turnoverPtdIns(3)P, a regulator of membrane traffic, is transported to the vacuole and degraded by a process that requires lumenal vacuolar hydrolase activities, EMBO (Eur. Mol. Biol. Organ.) J., 17, 1998, 4930–4942.[Medline]
Yamamoto A., Masaki R. & Tashiro Y.. Characterization of the isolation membranes and the limiting membranes of autophagosomes in rat hepatocytes by lectin cytochemistry, J. Histochem. Cytochem., 38, 1990, 573–580a.[Abstract]
Yamamoto A., Masaki R. & Tashiro Y.. Absence of cytochrome P-450 and presence of autolysosomal membrane antigens on the isolation membranes and autophagosomal membranes in rat hepatocytes, J. Histochem. Cytochem., 38, 1990, 1571–1581b.[Abstract]
Yuan W., Stromhaug P.E. & Dunn W.A.. Glucose-induced autophagy of peroxisomes in Pichia pastoris requires a unique E1-like protein, Mol. Biol. Cell., 10, 1999, 1353–1366.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|