|
||
© The Rockefeller University Press,
0021-9525/2001//1251 $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 153, Number 6,
, 2001 1251-1264
Original Article |
A Novel Integrin-Linked Kinase–Binding Protein, Affixin, Is Involved in the Early Stage of Cell–Substrate Interaction
ishigatsu{at}med.yokohama-cu.ac.jp
Focal adhesions (FAs) are essential structures for cell adhesion, migration, and morphogenesis. Integrin-linked kinase (ILK), which is capable of interacting with the cytoplasmic domain of β1 integrin, seems to be a key component of FAs, but its exact role in cell–substrate interaction remains to be clarified. Here, we identified a novel ILK-binding protein, affixin, that consists of two tandem calponin homology domains. In CHOcells, affixin and ILK colocalize at FAs and at the tip of the leading edge, whereas in skeletal muscle cells they colocalize at the sarcolemma where cells attach to the basal lamina, showing a striped pattern corresponding to cytoplasmic Z-band striation. When CHO cells are replated on fibronectin, affixin and ILK but not FA kinase and vinculin concentrate at the cell surface in blebs during the early stages of cell spreading, which will grow into membrane ruffles on lamellipodia. Overexpression of the COOH-terminal region of affixin, which is phosphorylated by ILK in vitro, blocks cell spreading at the initial stage, presumably by interfering with the formation of FAs and stress fibers. The coexpression of ILK enhances this effect. These results provide evidence suggesting that affixin is involved in integrin–ILK signaling required for the establishment of cell–substrate adhesion.
Key Words: affixin cell spreading focal adhesion integrin-linked kinase integrin
© 2001 The Rockefeller University Press
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-actinin. In addition to these components, signal transduction molecules such as FA kinase (FAK) and Src are also concentrated at FAs (Miyamoto et al. 1995). Indeed, in extremely integrated cell functions such as cell migration the integrin signals are activated at FAs by ECM stimulation and transmitted to intracellular components, producing a dynamic regulation of cytoskeletal organization. Importantly, although sufficiently rigid to provide strong adhesion, FAs are highly dynamic and can be reversibly assembled and disassembled in response to both internal and external signals. For example, the process of cell migration of cultured fibroblasts consists of (a) extending membrane protrusions called lamellipodia or filopodia to form initial cell–substrate attachments, (b) de novo formation of initial FAs at the tip of these membrane protrusions, (c) development of the mature forms of the FA complex and actin stress fibers (SFs) through the organization of several cytoskeletal proteins, and (d) disruption of FA complexes at the rear of the cell and retraction of the tail (Lauffenburger and Horwitz 1996). However, how matrix molecules, integrins, cytoskeletal molecules, and signaling molecules collaborate to promote such integrated events remains to be determined.
Integrins, the major transmembrane glycoproteins in FAs, consist of two different subunits (
and β chains) that form a heterodimer (Hynes 1992). Although their extracellular domains together form a ligand-linking site, their cytoplasmic domains are considered to provide attachment sites for cytoplasmic structural and signaling molecules. So far, to understand the molecular basis of integrin signaling, many molecules that can bind directly to the cytoplasmic tails of integrins have been successfully identified. One of these is integrin-linked kinase (ILK), which is a ubiquitously expressed serine–threonine protein kinase capable of interacting with the integrin β cytoplasmic domain (Hannigan et al. 1996). Although the first report on ILK demonstrated that its activity is regulated by cell–ECM interaction and that it plays a role in cell adhesion, the multifunctional aspects of this kinase being involved in signal transduction pathways including insulin and Wnt signaling were demonstrated in subsequent works (Hannigan et al. 1996; Delcommenne et al. 1998; Novak et al. 1998). On the other hand, recent studies have suggested the possibility that ILK is involved in the process of FA formation: the overexpression of ILK promotes the colocalization of
5β1 integrin and fibronectin with vinculin (Wu et al. 1998) and ILK colocalizes with
5β1 integrin and FAK in FAs (Li et al. 1999). However, the underlying molecular mechanism by which ILK is involved in the regulation of FA formation is still unclear.
In this study, we identified a novel calponin homology (CH) domain–containing protein, affixin, which interacts specifically with the kinase domain of ILK. Immunocytochemical analyses demonstrate that affixin colocalizes with ILK at FAs and at the tip of the leading edge. Furthermore, in cells replated on fibronectin-coated coverslips affixin shows codistribution with ILK in bleb-like initial membrane protrusions at a very early stage of cell spreading. The introduction of the COOH-terminal half of affixin, which binds ILK and is phosphorylated by ILK in vitro, inhibits the development of FAs and SFs and blocks the cell spreading process at a very early stage. Interestingly, when overexpressed in well-spread CHO cells, the COOH-terminal half of affixin also disrupts preformed FAs and SFs, but sufficient activity is observed only when ILK is coexpressed. These results suggest that affixin may be one of the downstream targets of ILK, which works at a very early stage of cell–substrate adhesion to allow the formation of FAs and SFs.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Northern Blot Analysis
To analyze the tissue distribution of mRNA expression, multiple tissue Northern blot membrane (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc.) was probed with a 32P-labeled human affixin cDNA probe, corresponding to amino acid residues 206–481 of the l-affixin prepared using a random-primed DNA labeling kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The hybridization was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (CLONTECH Laboratories, Inc.), and an x-ray film was exposed at –80°C for 10 d with an intensifying screen.
Affixin and ILK Mutations
Affixin and ILK deletion mutants were generated by PCR using appropriate primers. Point mutations in ILK mutants (E359K, K220M, K220A) were introduced using a QuickChange site-directed mutagenesis kit (Stratagene). The fidelities of the amplified sequences were all verified by DNA sequencing.
Cell Culture
CHO-K1 cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2 in F-12 medium containing 10% FCS (Cell Culture Technologies, Inc.), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 100 µg/ml streptomycin. COS-7 cells were cultured under the same conditions as those for CHO-K1, except for the use of DME instead of F-12 medium. cDNA transfection was performed by either electroporation for the immunoprecipitation assay or lipofection using a Fugene6 transfection reagent (Roche) for immunofluorescence analysis. When performing the replating assay, CHO-K1 cells were transfected with the appropriate expression plasmids, harvested 48 h later by incubating in 0.05% trypsin in PBS containing 0.02% (wt/wt) EDTA, washed two times with PBS, and replated on fibronectin-coated coverslips.
Antibodies
The antibodies used in this study were anti-Flag and antivinculin monoclonal antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich), anti-FAK monoclonal antibodies (Transduction Laboratories), anti-ILK monoclonal antibody (Upstate Biotechnology), anti–
-actinin monoclonal antibody (provided by Yukiko Hayashi, National Institute of Neuroscience, NCNP, Japan), anti-T7 monoclonal antibody (Novagen), and FITC-phalloidin and rhodamine-phalloidin (Molecular Probes). Antiaffixin antibodies were generated in rabbits using glutathione S-transferase (GST)–ss-affixin as an antigen and affinity purified with the antigen before use.
SDS-PAGE and Immunoblot Analysis
For analysis of affixin expression in various rat tissues, each organ was excised from 10-wk-old Sprague Dawley rats deeply anesthetized with diethyl ether, washed with ice-cold PBS, and frozen immediately in liquid nitrogen. The tissue blocks were crushed using a Cryo-Press (Diatron) precooled in liquid nitrogen, and the resultant powder was suspended in 10 vol (vol/wt) of SDS sample buffer, homogenized with a Polytron homogenizer (Kinematica), and sonicated. 15-µg aliquots of these samples were loaded in each lane. Electrophoresis was carried out by one-dimensional SDS-PAGE (10 or 12% polyacrylamide). The separated proteins were transferred onto PVDF membranes, which were subsequently blocked with 5% skimmed milk. The membranes were treated with appropriate antibodies, and antibody reactions were visualized by a chemiluminescence ECL system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).
Immunoprecipitation Assay
Cells cultured in 10-cm dishes were suspended in 200 µl lysis buffer containing 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 mM PMSF, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% deoxycholate, and 0.1% SDS. After a 30-min incubation on ice, the lysates were clarified by centrifugation at 14,000 rpm for 30 min. 15 µl of protein G–Sepharose (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) conjugated with 2 µg of affinity-purified antiaffixin, anti-Flag antibodies, or control normal rabbit IgG were incubated with the cell lysates for 1 h at 4°C. After washing with lysis buffer, the immunocomplex was solubilized by adding SDS sample buffer to the resin.
Immunofluorescence Microscopy
CHO-K1 cells or those transfected with expression plasmids were cultured on fibronectin-coated coverslips for 48 h and, after washing with PBS, fixed with 1 or 2% formaldehyde in PBS for 15 min and then permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 15 min at room temperature. In some experiments, cells were fixed with 100% methanol. The cells were blocked with PBS containing 10% calf serum for 1 h at room temperature and then treated with appropriate primary antibodies for 45 min at 37°C in a moist chamber. After washing with PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20, the cells were incubated with secondary antibodies (Cy3-conjugated goat anti–rabbit [Amersham Pharmacia Biotech] and Alexa488-conjugated goat anti–mouse antibodies [Molecular Probes]) at 37°C for 45 min. After washing, samples were observed under a fluorescence microscope (BX50; Olympus) equipped with a cooled CCD camera (Photometrics). Human skeletal muscle sample was obtained by biopsy for diagnostic purpose with informed consent. Thin sections of 6-µm thickness were fixed for 10 min with 100% acetone at –20°C, blocked for 15 min at 37°C with 2% BSA and 0.5% goat serum in PBS, and then processed for immunofluorescence analysis. Confocal microscopic analysis was performed using a Bio-Rad Laboratories Radiance 2000 scan head mounted on a Nikon Eclipse E600 microscope.
Purification of Recombinant Affixin and Its Mutant from Escherichia Coli
GST–ss-affixin and GST–RP2 fusion proteins were induced in E. coli with isopropyl β-D-thio-galactopyranoside (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech), and the proteins were purified with glutathione–Sepharose 4B beads (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech). The GST linker sites of these fusion proteins were digested with PreScissionTM protease (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) according to the manufacturer's protocol, and the excised recombinant proteins eluted from the resin were dialyzed against the appropriate buffers before use.
In Vitro Kinase Assay
COS-7 cells transfected with expression vectors encoding Flag-tagged ILK or its mutants were lysed in 20 mM Hepes, pH 7.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 10 µg/ml leupeptin, 1 mM PMSF, 1% Triton X-100, and 0.1% deoxycholate. Immunoprecipitates by anti-Flag antibody were extensively washed with lysis buffer and then kinase reaction buffer (50 mM Hepes, pH 7.0, 10 mM MnCl2, 10 mM MgCl2, 2 mM NaF, 1 mM Na3VO4) and subjected to protein kinase assays in 20 µl kinase reaction buffer containing 10 µCi [
-32P]ATP and an appropriate substrate (myelin basic protein [MBP] or recombinant affixin). After incubation for 60 min at 30°C, the reaction mixture was resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE, and bands were visualized by a Bio-imaging analyzer system (BAS2000; Fuji).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
-actinin, and dystrophin (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 A). In these actin cross-linking proteins, the sequences are composed of 240 amino acid residues containing a tandem repeat of two CH domains, followed by an extended rod domain with a coiled coil structure (spectrin repeats; Fig. 2 B). However, the affixin sequence exhibits several unique features. First, as shown in Fig. 2 B, most of the affixin molecule corresponds to only two repeated CH domains with short flanking NH2- and COOH-terminal sequences and lacks the rod domain. Second, the two tandem CH domains in actin cross-linking proteins, CH1 (NH2-terminal) and CH2 (COOH-terminal), show weaker homology to each other in contrast to their intermolecular homology. On the other hand, both CH domains of affixin show higher homology to the CH1 domains of actin cross-linking proteins (Fig. 2A and Fig. B). Third, the homology between actin cross-linking proteins and affixin is restricted to the NH2-terminal half of the CH domains. The sequence of the COOH-terminal half of affixin is highly diverged, although the COOH-terminal hydrophobic moieties that have been suggested to be important for the actin binding of these actin cross-linking proteins are partially conserved (Fig. 2 A, underline; Carugo et al. 1997). Additionally, the COOH-terminal regions in the affixin CH domains show divergence from the consensus residues that are essentially conserved in CH domain–containing proteins such as calponin (Fig. 2 A, asterisks). Interestingly, recent progress in genome projects has revealed that affixin has counterparts in other species. C. elegans T21D12.4 shows 64% overall similarity and 45% identity, whereas D. melanogaster AAF49016 shows 71% similarity and 58% identity (Fig. 1 and Fig. 2 B). Taken together, we conclude that affixin is a unique member of the CH domain–containing proteins, which is well conserved evolutionary from worms to humans.
|
|
|
Affixin Is a Direct Substrate for ILK In Vitro
Since the kinase domain of ILK is sufficient to associate with affixin, we next tested whether affixin can be phosphorylated by ILK in vitro. In Fig. 5 A, Flag-tagged wild-type or kinase-deficient ILK was overexpressed in COS-7 cells, and the kinase activity in the anti-Flag antibody immunoprecipitates was assayed using MBP as a substrate. The immunoprecipitates from cells expressing wild-type ILK showed enhanced kinase activity, whereas those from ILK (K220A)- and ILK(K220M)-expressing cells showed the background level of the activity. Surprisingly, the immunoprecipitate of ILK(E359K) reproducibly showed kinase activity comparable to wild-type ILK, suggesting that this mutant is not kinase deficient, although we do not know the reason for the discrepancy with the previous data (Novak et al. 1998). When we used recombinant affixin purified from E. coli as a substrate, the wild-type ILK immunoprecipitates but not the K220M immunoprecipitates phosphorylated affixin to the same extent as MBP, suggesting that affixin is a good substrate for ILK in vitro (Fig. 5 B). Consistent with the results on the narrowed binding site of the ILK–affixin interaction, the deletion mutant of affixin, RP2, was also phosphorylated by the ILK immunoprecipitates to a similar extent (Fig. 5 B). We also examined the possibility that affixin affects the kinase activity of ILK, since as shown in Fig. 4 D the activation loop of the kinase domain of ILK is involved in the interaction with affixin. However, the addition of recombinant affixin to the ILK immunoprecipitates did not affect 32P incorporation into MBP (data not shown), suggesting that affixin can be a substrate but not a regulator of ILK kinase activity.
|
-actinin–staining anchor (Fig. 7, G–I, arrowheads). These results indicate that affixin and ILK are concentrated to the region on the sarcolemma where Z-bands attach, which are the corresponding structures of FAs in cultured cells.
|
|
|
|
50%; Fig. 10E and Fig. F). This effect of ILK was not observed in cells expressing RP1 (Fig. 10 C). Therefore, these results indicate that the second CH domain of affixin requires the interaction with active ILK to exert the deleterious effects on cell–substrate adhesion, whereas it does not in cells that are actively spreading (Fig. 9 B compared with Fig. 10B and Fig. D).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
FAs form and disappear continuously during cell locomotion and the cell spreading process, and the underlying molecular basis of this dynamic nature of FAs has been extensively investigated. FAK, one of the major protein kinases accumulating at FAs, was thought to function in the initial step of FA formation, partially because many FA components are tyrosine phosphorylated during the FA formation. However, recent results revealed that FAs can be formed even in the absence or inhibition of FAK activity, implying the presence of more essential signaling molecules regulating the formation of the FA complex (Ilic et al. 1995). The recent finding of ILK, which is activated within 30–45 min after plating on fibronectin (Delcommenne et al. 1998) and is localized to FAs in CHO cells (Li et al. 1999), suggests the new possibility that this serine–threonine kinase is involved in FA formation. In this context, the present results are important in not only supporting these notions about the physiological function of ILK signaling but also suggesting the involvement of affixin in this ILK function.
Affixin Is a Possible ILK Substrate That Transmits Integrin–ILK Signaling for the Initial FA Formation
Yeast two-hybrid assays and immunoprecipitation assays in COS-7 cells revealed that the kinase domain of ILK interacts specifically with the second CH domain of affixin. The glutamic acid residue located in the activation loop of the ILK kinase domain is further demonstrated to be critical for the interaction. Consistently, in vitro kinase assay showed that the second CH domain can be a substrate for ILK, suggesting the possibility that affixin is a novel in vivo substrate for ILK, which links integrin–ILK signaling to the initial FA formation. This was further supported by showing the deleterious effects of an affixin deletion mutant, RP2, corresponding to the second CH domain, on FA formation: when CHO cells overexpressing RP2 were reseeded on fibronectin, >75% of the cells retained their round form and could not develop FAs and SFs. Closer inspection further suggested that the cells were completely blocked at the initial phase of the spreading process with many surface blebs. Interestingly, this effect of RP2 on FA formation was not significantly observed if it was expressed in cells which have already established FAs. Only a limited number (<10%) of cells expressing RP2 alone showed a round shape, and the number was dramatically increased to levels comparable to those of spreading cells when wild-type ILK was cotransfected. Because this enhancement was not observed by cotransfection of kinase-deficient ILK K220M or an affixin-binding–deficient ILK mutant, ILK(E359K), these results indicate that the effect of RP2 is dependent on the interaction with active ILK, probably on the phosphorylation by ILK. The apparent discrepancy of the effects of RP2 on well-spread cells and on actively spreading cells can be reasonably explained by assuming that integrin–ILK signaling evoked by initial cell–substrate interaction (Delcommenne et al. 1998) mimics the effect of ILK overexpressing in actively spreading cells. Although further studies will be needed, the present result about the positive effect of RP1, the first CH domain, on cell spreading may suggest that this domain is also involved in the interaction with the downstream target for FA formation in a different way from RP2.
Amino acid sequence analysis of affixin revealed it to represent a novel member of the CH domain–containing protein family that is conserved from worms to mammals. Considering that most CH domain–containing proteins have been shown to be related to the actin cytoskeleton (Stradal et al. 1998), the putative molecular target of affixin may be the actin cytoskeleton. This notion is further supported by the fact that both CH domains in affixin exhibit the closest homology to those of the actin-binding regions of actin cross-linking proteins such as β-spectrin and
-actinin. Hence, it is quite possible that affixin also binds directly to F-actin. In fact, we observed that although weakly, endogenous affixin localizes to SFs in cultured cells (Fig. 6A, Fig. E, and Fig. G). However, despite extensive efforts, we have not succeeded in detecting the direct interactions of affixin or RP2 with F-actin and cannot yet discuss the molecular mechanism by which affixin plays critical roles in FA development in detail. It may be due to the unique divergence of affixin from the sequence of actin-linking proteins. Of course, it is possible that the phosphorylation of affixin by ILK is required for its interaction with F-actin. We are now conducting further experiments to address these issues as one of the major extensions of the present study.
Affixin and ILK in Muscle Cells
Northern and Western blot analyses showed that affixin is highly expressed in skeletal muscle and heart, suggesting its role in cell–substrate interaction in muscle cells. Interestingly, the mutation/depletion of the C. elegans homologue of β-integrin (pat-3) or ILK-binding protein, PINCH (unc-97), from the embryo was reported to result in a similar phenotype called "pat" showing paralysis and elongation arrest at the twofold stage due to defects in the integrity of myofibril structures in the body wall muscle (Williams and Waterston 1994; Gettner et al. 1995; Dedhar et al. 1999; Hobert et al. 1999). Since the body wall muscles of these mutants show disorganized dense bodies (structural analogues of FAs in cultured cells) to which β-integrin/PAT-3, vinculin/DEB-1, and PINCH/UNC-97 are localized, it has been suggested that defects in the development of dense bodies are the primary cause of the phenotype (Gettner et al. 1995; Hobert et al. 1999). Interestingly, we recently observed that the C. elegans embryo from which the expression of ILK or affixin homologues (CAB77052 or T21D12.4, respectively) was deleted by the RNA interference method shows pat phenotype characterized by an arrest during its development at twofold stage and paralysis (Sugiyama, Y., unpublished results). Although we have not confirmed that these are primarily caused by defects in muscle attachments, our present results showing ILK and affixin play important roles in FA development, and it might be reasonable to speculate that these embryo also have defects in dense body formation. Consistently, immunohistochemical analysis of human skeletal muscle demonstrated that affixin and ILK colocalize to the sarcolemma showing a striated pattern matching cytoplasmic Z-band striation, suggesting that these proteins accumulate at sites where the Z-band attaches to the sarcolemma, which correspond to dense bodies in C. elegans body wall muscle cells. Taken together, these results imply the possibility that affixin and ILK are also important for muscle development and function.
During the revision of this manuscript, a novel CH domain protein similar to affixin, actopaxin, was reported as a paxillin-binding protein. One of the clones we obtained in the two-hybrid screening using ILK as bait, FL29, was identical to actopaxin, indicating that this protein also binds ILK. Affixin and actopaxin are products of distinct genes with different expression patterns but share common features such as localization to focal contact.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
This work was supported by grants from the Yokohama Foundation for Advancement of Medical Science (to S. Yamaji).
Abbreviations used in this paper: CH, calponin homology; ECM, extracellular matrix; FA, focal adhesion; FAK, FA kinase; GST, glutathione S-transferase; ILK, integrin-linked kinase; MBP, myelin basic protein; SF, stress fiber.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Bauer J.S., Varner J., Schreiner C., Kornberg L., Nicholas R. & Juliano R.L.. Functional role of the cytoplasmic domain of the integrin alpha 5 subunit, J. Cell Biol, 122, 1993, 209–221.
Bereiter-Hahn J., Luck M., Miebach T., Stelzer H.K. & Voth M.. Spreading of trypsinized cellscytoskeletal dynamics and energy requirements, J. Cell Sci, 96, 1990, 171–188.
Carugo K.D., Banuelos S. & Saraste M.. Crystal structure of a calponin homology domain, Nat. Struct. Biol., 4, 1997, 175–179.[Medline]
Cunningham C.C.. Actin polymerization and intracellular solvent flow in cell surface blebbing, J. Cell Biol., 129, 1995, 1589–1599.
Dedhar S., Williams B. & Hannigan G.. Integrin-linked kinase (ILK)a regulator of integrin and growth-factor signalling, Trends Cell Biol, 9, 1999, 319–323.[Medline]
Delcommenne M., Tan C., Gray V., Rue L., Woodgett J. & Dedhar S.. Phosphoinositide-3-OH kinase-dependent regulation of glycogen synthase kinase 3 and protein kinase B/AKT by the integrin-linked kinase, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 95, 1998, 11211–11216.
Gettner S.N., Kenyon C. & Reichardt L.F.. Characterization of beta pat-3 heterodimers, a family of essential integrin receptors in C. elegans, J. Cell Biol., 129, 1995, 1127–1141.
Hannigan G.E., Leung-Hagesteijn C., Fitz-Gibbon L., Coppolino M.G., Radeva G., Filmus J., Bell J.C. & Dedhar S.. Regulation of cell adhesion and anchorage-dependent growth by a new beta 1-integrin-linked protein kinase, Nature., 379, 1996, 91–96.[Medline]
Hobert O., Moerman D.G., Clark K.A., Beckerle M.C. & Ruvkun G.. A conserved LIM protein that affects muscular adherens junction integrity and mechanosensory function in Caenorhabditis elegans, J. Cell Biol, 144, 1999, 45–57.
Hughes P.E. & Pfaff M.. Integrin affinity modulation, Trends Cell Biol., 8, 1998, 359–364.[Medline]
Hynes R.O.. Integrinsversatility, modulation, and signaling in cell adhesion, Cell., 69, 1992, 11–25.[Medline]
Ilic D., Furuta Y., Kanazawa S., Takeda N., Sobue K., Nakatsuji N., Nomura S., Fujimoto J., Okada M. & Yamamoto T.. Reduced cell motility and enhanced focal adhesion contact formation in cells from FAK-deficient mice, Nature., 377, 1995, 539–544.[Medline]
Jockusch B.M., Bubeck P., Giehl K., Kroemker M., Moschner J., Rothkegel M., Rudiger M., Schluter K., Stanke G. & Winkler J.. The molecular architecture of focal adhesions, Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol., 11, 1995, 379–416.[Medline]
Lauffenburger D.A. & Horwitz A.F.. Cell migrationa physically integrated molecular process, Cell., 84, 1996, 359–369.[Medline]
Lai C.H., Chou C.Y., Ch'ang L.Y., Liu C.S. & Lin W.. Identification of novel human genes evolutionarily conserved in Caenorhabditis elegans by comparative proteomics, Genome Res., 10, 2000, 703–713.
Li F., Zhang Y. & Wu C.. Integrin-linked kinase is localized to cell-matrix focal adhesions but not cell-cell adhesion sites and the focal adhesion localization of integrin-linked kinase is regulated by the PINCH-binding ANK repeats, J. Cell Sci., 112, 1999, 4589–4599.[Abstract]
Miyamoto S., Teramoto H., Coso O.A., Gutkind J.S., Burbelo P.D., Akiyama S.K. & Yamada K.M.. Integrin functionmolecular hierarchies of cytoskeletal and signaling molecules, J. Cell Biol., 131, 1995, 791–805.
Novak A., Hsu S.C., Leung-Hagesteijn C., Radeva G., Papkoff J., Montesano R., Roskelley C., Grosschedl R. & Dedhar S.. Cell adhesion and the integrin-linked kinase regulate the LEF-1 and beta-catenin signaling pathways, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA., 95, 1998, 4374–4379.
Stradal T., Kranewitter W., Winder S.J. & Gimona M.. CH domains revisited, FEBS Lett., 431, 1998, 134–137.[Medline]
Tu Y., Li F., Goicoechea S. & Wu C.. The LIM-only protein PINCH directly interacts with integrin-linked kinase and is recruited to integrin-rich sites in spreading cells, Mol. Cell. Biol., 19, 1999, 2425–2434.
Vachon P.H., Xu H., Liu L., Loechel F., Hayashi Y., Arahata K., Reed J.C., Wewer U.M. & Engvall E.. Integrins (alpha7beta1) in muscle function and survival. Disrupted expression in merosin-deficient congenital muscular dystrophy, J. Clin. Invest, 100, 1997, 1870–1881.[Medline]
Williams B.D. & Waterston R.H.. Genes critical for muscle development and function in Caenorhabditis elegans identified through lethal mutations, J. Cell Biol, 124, 1994, 475–490.
Wu C., Keightley S.Y., Leung-Hagesteijn C., Radeva G., Coppolino M., Goicoechea S., McDonald J.A. & Dedhar S.. Integrin-linked protein kinase regulates fibronectin matrix assembly, E-cadherin expression, and tumorigenicity, J. Biol. Chem., 273, 1998, 528–536.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|