JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 22 October 2001. doi:10.1083/jcb1553iti2
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 211K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dove, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dove, A. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/2001/10/322-a $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 155, Number 3, October 29, 2001 322-a-323


In This Issue

Shape up or ship out


Some unfolded proteins cycle before being degraded.

When proteins become misfolded in the ER, a quality control system targets them to the cytoplasm for degradation. On page 355, Vashist et al. have uncovered two separate sorting systems involved in ER quality control, and have identified a novel gene required for one of the two pathways. The findings indicate that ER quality control is more complex than previously believed.

By tracking the fates of several mutant proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the authors identified a sorting step in the ER in which misfolded proteins are targeted to one of two pathways. Some proteins are packaged into COPII transport vesicles, while others are excluded from vesicles and retained in the ER. Proteins packaged into vesicles are transported to the Golgi apparatus, then returned to the ER by retrograde transport, at which point the two pathways converge and both the retained and retrieved proteins are degraded.

Each mutant protein only follows one pathway, suggesting that the sorting system is highly selective. Although the results are consistent with a model in which membrane proteins are retained while soluble proteins follow the retrieval pathway, the authors stress that more extensive analysis will be required to identify the preferences of the sorting system.A genetic screen uncovered a mutant allele of the BST1 gene that blocks the transport of misfolded proteins from the ER to the Golgi without affecting most normal protein transport. Although the retrieval pathway is blocked in these cells, proteins targeted to the retention pathway by the ER are still degraded normally. Vashist et al. are now identifying additional genes specifically involved in the retention and retrieval pathways. {blacksquare}



Alan W. Dove

alanwdove{at}earthlink.net


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 211K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dove, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dove, A. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents