JCB logo
CrossRef
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 5 November 2001. doi:10.1083/jcb1554rr5
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 266K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/2001/11/497-b $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 155, Number 4, November 12, 2001 497-b-497


Research Roundup

Slide this way


Single molecules of cAMP engage receptors on Dictyostelium.

Ueda/AAAS

When cells of the slime mold Dictyostelium sense cAMP, they get the urge to merge, steering toward the source of the chemical and fusing into a slimy blob. By observing labeled cAMP receptors on traveling slime mold cells, Masahiro Ueda (Osaka University, Osaka, Japan) and coworkers were able to document differences in receptor activity between the "front" and "back" ends. The paper marks one of the first uses of a new technique for resolving and monitoring individual molecules.

To label the individual cAMP receptors, the authors fused cAMP molecules to an orange fluorescent dye called Cy3 and thenexposed the slime mold cells to the compound. Using a total internal reflection fluorescence microscope, they could track and count the receptors on the cell surface that had bound to the glowing cAMP. "This technique can reveal the dynamics of the individual signaling molecules in living cells," says Ueda.

The observations confirm previous reports that the migrating cells are polarized. Although there were about the same number of receptors at each end, 12% more receptors were bound to cAMP at the anterior end than at the posterior end. The investigators also found that the receptors at the anterior end released their cAMP more quickly. How the cells become polarized remains a mystery, Ueda says. However, polarity apparently develops independent of the cAMP gradient. "It will be important to determine how cells initially form such a polarity in receptor states and whether chemoattractant gradients can modify it," Ueda says. {blacksquare}

Reference:

Ueda, M., et al. 2001. Science. 294:864–867.[Abstract/Full Text]



Mitch Leslie

mleslie{at}cybermesa.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 266K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Leslie, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents