JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 19 November 2001. doi:10.1083/jcb1555rr1
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 216K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/2001/11/693 $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 155, Number 5, November 26, 2001 693-693


Research Roundup

Pinning down NuMA


Spindles go haywire when there is too much (left) or too little (right) LGN.

Macara/Macmillan

Much to their surprise, Ian Macara and colleagues (University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA) have ended up studying not spindle rotation, but spindle construction.

Their protein of interest, LGN, is the human counterpart of the Drosophila protein Partner of inscuteable (Pins), which helps localize the apical determinant Inscuteable (Insc). Du et al. figured that they could study LGN-mediated spindle rotation using mammalian epithelia, as in these cells the prometaphase spindle rotates to reach its final metaphase orientation. But instead they found that LGN is needed for the construction of the spindle.Overexpression of LGN appears to disrupt microtubule attachment to spindle poles, whereas a lowering of LGN levels using RNAi results in the formation of multiple poles. Thus, LGN may inhibit spindle pole formation, perhaps via an interaction with NuMA that Du et al. detect using multiple methods. NuMA is normally transported to spindle poles where it anchors and focuses microtubules. How LGN might affect this process is unknown, but the entry of LGN into the nucleus at the end of prophase (when the nuclear envelope breaks down) may restrict spindles such that they form only two poles. {blacksquare}

Reference:

Du, Q., et al. 2001. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:1069–1075.

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu



William A. Wells


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 216K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents