JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published 24 December 2001. doi:10.1083/jcb1557iti4
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 273K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dove, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dove, A. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/2001/12/1093-a $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 155, Number 7, December 24, 2001 1093-a-1093


In This Issue

Finding Rho attractive


Excess repulsion in a Robo mutant (left) is decreased by GEF64C (right).

Neuronal growth cones are guided by both attractive and repulsive signals during development. Until now, one part of the guidance signaling system appeared relatively straightforward: Rac GTPases stimulate attraction, while Rho GTPases stimulate repulsion. But on page 1117, Bashaw et al. describe the activity of a new Rho guanine nucleotide exchange factor in Drosophila melanogaster, GEF64C, that can stimulate axon attraction.

The authors started with flies expressing a chimeric receptor, which caused excessive crossing of the midline of the central nervous system. Overexpression of GEF64C exacerbated this phenotype. Bashaw et al. knew that the established attractants and repellents emanate from the midline, so they interpreted the new phenotye as resulting from increased attraction to the midline. GEF64C overexpression also promoted midline crossing in a mutant that otherwise shows excessive repulsion away from the midline.

The GEF64C effects were diminished by a dominant-negative RhoA, but unaffected by dominant-negative Rac1 or Cdc42. It is unclear how RhoA might promote attraction. But, based on the convergence of multiple guidance signals downstream of receptors, this type of downstream machinery presents an intriguing possibility for therapies that aim to stimulate axon regrowth in injured humans. {blacksquare}



Alan W. Dove

alanwdove{at}earthlink.net


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 273K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dove, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dove, A. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents