JCB logo
CrossRef
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 26 March 2002. doi:10.1083/jcb1571rr2
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 237K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/2002/4/13-a $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 157, Number 1, April 1, 2002 13-a-13


Research Roundup

Make junction, will travel


Beads coated with E-cadherin trigger actin assembly.

Yap/Elsevier

Cadherin-based adhesion complexes can trigger actin assembly, according to a proposal from Eva Kovacs, Alpha Yap, and colleagues (University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia). The actin assembly may, in turn, control how cells recognize and move over one another.

Kovacs and Yap began their study by observing cells moving over a substrate covered with E-cadherin. They noticed that clumps of E-cadherin colocalized with both filamentous actin and components of the actin-nucleating Arp2/3 complex. Similar colocalization was apparent upon addition of E-cadherin beads. Finally, E-cadherin coimmunoprecipitated with Arp2/3 components, even in the presence of the actin-depolymerizing drug cytochalasin D.

The association suggests that cadherin ligation might trigger actin assembly by Arp2/3. "What we'd like to correct," says Yap, "is the notion that cadherin complexes are solely binding to preformed actin filaments." In his view, the adhesion machinery is no longer seen as an inert scaffold, but as a dynamic complex that drives changes in cell shape and movement.

The connection between E-cadherin and Arp2/3 may or may not be direct. When Yap and his colleagues know more about this interaction, they hope to disrupt it without interfering with cadherin adhesive function, thus testing the importance of the link. They will be looking for defects in processes such as compaction, when cell surfaces extend over one another. {blacksquare}

Reference:

Kovacs, E.M., et al. 2002. Curr. Biol. 12:379–382.[CrossRef][Medline]



William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 237K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents