JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published 28 May 2002. doi:10.1083/jcb1575iti3
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 191K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/2002/5/734 $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 157, Number 5, May 28, 2002 734-734


In This Issue

Bundle loss makes turning possible


Loss of actin bundles (black) and microtubules (red) turns growth cones away from repulsive cues.

Tightly bundled actin filaments direct axonal pathfinding, according to new study by Zhou et al. on page 839. The results identify how changes in actin structure control microtubule polymerization during neurite growth.As a neuron extends its axon, the growth cone turns toward certain cues and away from others. Turning involves collapse of lamellipodia to avoid the inhibitory signal and growth in a different direction. Although a requirement for actin and microtubules in this process is well established, how the two cytoskeletal elements change in response to avoidance cues was not known.

Zhou et al. have determined that disassembly of actin bundles is all that is necessary to initiate axon turning. In the absence of the bundles, force generated from actin retrograde flow toward the growth cone center prevents the extension of microtubules toward the leading edge. Inhibitory cues such as collapsin probably signal from their receptors to inhibit actin-bundling proteins, such as myosin II or fascin. This results in local lamellipodial collapse and asymmetric growth away from the inhibitory signal.

Based on microscopy, it appears that microtubules use actin bundles to extend toward the lamellipodia. How the bundles allow the microtubules to overcome retrograde flow is unclear, but may involve proteins such as MAPs and plakins, which have both actin- and tubulin-binding domains. {blacksquare}



Nicole LeBrasseur

lebrasn{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Article

Focal loss of actin bundles causes microtubule redistribution and growth cone turning
Feng-Quan Zhou, Clare M. Waterman-Storer, and Christopher S. Cohan
J. Cell Biol. 2002 157: 839-849. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 191K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents