JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 1 July 2002. doi:10.1083/jcb1581rr2
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 223K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/2002/7/10 $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 158, Number 1, July 8, 2002 10-10


Research Roundup

Bacteria tear down microtubules


VirA disrupts microtubules (green) and causes membrane ruffling.

Sasakawa/EMBO

Many invasive bacteria let themselves into host cells, not bothering to wait for an invitation. So far, known effector proteins that allow bacteria to enter work by rearranging actin dynamics. But new research from Sei Yoshida, Chihiro Sasakawa (University of Tokyo, Tokyo), and colleagues reveals that Shigella bacteria have another trick up their proverbial sleeves. They destabilize microtubules (MTs) to promote their own phagocytosis.

Shigella uses the Type III secretion system to deliver a set of its effector proteins into cells it plans to invade. Some of these proteins act in well-known ways to modulate the actin cytoskeleton. For instance, IpaA binds the focal adhesion protein vinculin, and this complex promotes actin depolymerization. But the group focused on VirA, which acts independently of other effectors. Shigella lacking VirA are 70–80% less invasive than wild-type bacteria.

The authors found that VirA bound {alpha}/ß-tubulin heterodimers and destabilized MTs in vitro and in vivo. Destabilization led to membrane ruffling around the bacterium, an effect that was dependent on the activation of Rac1. Sasakawa is not yet sure how VirA binding causes MT instability. Bound heterodimers may be held less stably in the MT lattice, or VirA might compete with MTs for binding to tubulin heterodimers. VirA homologues exist in other bacteria, including E. coli, indicating that a wide range of pathogens may alter MT dynamics to aid in their invasion. {blacksquare}

Reference:

Yoshida, S., et al. 2002. EMBO J. 21:2923–2935.[CrossRef][Medline]



Nicole LeBrasseur

lebrasn{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 223K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents