JCB logo
CrossRef
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published 30 September 2002. doi:10.1083/jcb1587iti4
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 294K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dove, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dove, A. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/2002/9/1153-b $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 158, Number 7, September 30, 2002 1153-b-1153


In This Issue

An endosomal switchboard


TGFß signaling (green) takes place in endosomes (red).

Studies on the internalization of signaling receptors generally suggest that receptor endocytosis attenuates signaling. On page 1239, Hayes et al. turn this concept on its head, showing that inhibiting endocytosis actually impairs TGFß receptor signaling. The findings suggest that endosomes may in fact serve as specialized signaling compartments that amplify and propagate certain types of cellular signals.

The authors found that the endogenous TGFß receptor in cultured cells localizes to endosomes containing the early endosomal marker EEA1. SARA, a soluble cytoplasmic protein required for TGFß function, is found almost exclusively in the same EEA1-enriched endosomes. Disrupting TGFß receptor endocytosis impairs downstream signaling events normally mediated by the receptor. This result is reminiscent of the disruption of antiapoptotic signaling recently noted in cells that lack clathrin function (Wettey, F.R., et al. 2002. Science 297:1521–1525).

This is the first time membrane trafficking has been shown to be required for the productive association of two components of a signaling pathway, and it suggests that the function of the endosome in signaling may need to be reevaluated. Hayes et al. propose two models to explain their results: either SARA and other signaling components are restricted to the endosome, requiring TGFß receptor internalization to form the signaling complex, or the TGFß receptor signaling complex forms at the plasma membrane, but requires the biochemical conditions of the endosome to produce a signal. {blacksquare}



Alan W. Dove

alanwdove{at}earthlink.net


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 294K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dove, A. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Dove, A. W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents