JCB logo
R&D Systems: New Poster Available
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 23 September 2002. doi:10.1083/jcb1587rr3
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 249K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/2002/9/1154-a $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 158, Number 7, September 30, 2002 1154-a-1154


Research Roundup

Semaphorins—not just for axons


Semaphorins (middle) and SF (bottom) both induce invasive growth.

Comoglio/Macmillan

An axon guidance factor can work with growth factor receptors to trigger invasive growth, according to a recent article by Silvia Giordano, Paolo Comoglio, and colleagues (Institute for Cancer Research, University of Torino, Torino, Italy).

The guidance cues are semaphorins, soluble and cell surface molecules that have homology to Met, a scatter factor (SF) receptor tyrosine kinase. Met and semaphorins also share homology with the extracellular domain of semaphorin receptors, known as plexins. Because plexins and semaphorins are expressed outside the nervous system, Giordano et al. examined what function they might control in other tissues.

They found that ligand stimulation of a plexin in epithelial cells caused invasive growth, including scattering and anchorage-independent growth. Met is the only kinase known to trigger invasive growth and, as expected, without Met, this plexin-stimulated growth was blocked. Epithelial cells seem primed for crosstalk between the two receptors, as Met and plexin were in a preformed complex, mediated by their conserved domains. SF and semaphorins in combination produced a stronger response than either alone. "These two modalities of activation can cooperate for certain biological responses but not for others, and this could be a way to fine tune responses such as invasion, without interfering with growth," says Giordano. {blacksquare}

Reference:

Giordano, S., et al. 2002. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:720–724.[CrossRef][Medline]



Nicole LeBrasseur

lebrasn{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 249K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents