Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF, 167K) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JCB Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wells, W. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Wells, W. A. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/2002/11/390 $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 159, Number 3, 390-390

Flicking the chromosome–attachment switch

Chromosomes lag (left) or are stuck at one pole (right) depending on the phosphorylation status of the Dam1p subcomplex. Barnes/Elsevier

Iain Cheeseman, Georjana Barnes (University of California, Berkeley, CA), and colleagues have peered into a 28-protein mix and found the individual residues responsible for attaching and detaching chromosomes and microtubules. The phosphorylation of these residues by Ipl1p (an Aurora kinase) apparently allows budding yeast cells to convert monopolar chromosome spindle attachments to bipolar attachments.

The group used the mass spectrometry (MS) expertise of Scott Anderson and John Yates (Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA) to identify 28 yeast kinetochore proteins (including 5 previously unidentified proteins) in 4 subcomplexes. The same analysis identified 18 phosphorylation sites, 10 of which appear to be Ipl1p targets.

Mutation of individual sites for Ipl1p phosphorylation did not yield any phenotype. But mutation of four sites in the microtubule-binding Dam1p was lethal, and mutant combinations focused on Dam1p led to either constitutive attachment of kinetochores to microtubules (when sites were converted to alanines) or weakened attachment (when sites were converted to phosphorylation-mimicking aspartate residues).

The identification of specific sites for kinetochore–attachment regulation is a victory for the MS approach. "It's one thing to find kinase targets," says coauthor David Drubin, "but it's another to find the important target."

Reference:

Cheeseman, I.M., et al. 2002. Cell. 111:163–172.

William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Full Text (PDF, 167K) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JCB Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wells, W. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Wells, W. A. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?