Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF, 381K) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JCB Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wells, W. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Wells, W. A. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/2002/12/728 $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 159, Number 5, 728-728

When more is not more

A mouse with active CaMKII is first to the target, but its learning is less flexible and less fine-tuned. Elgersma

Boosting the function of a learning protein jams the brain with too much information, according to Ype Elgersma (Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands), Alcino Silva (University of California, Los Angeles, CA), and colleagues. The result is a cautionary tale for those seeking to develop learning drugs.

The team created mice lacking two inhibitory phosphorylation sites on CaMKII. Wild-type CaMKII is displaced from synapses in part by the phosphorylation, but the mutant protein has an enhanced affinity for synapses. This lowers the threshold for establishing long-term potentiation (LTP)—a synapse-strengthening event associated with learning—probably because it now takes less calcium rushing into the synapse to reach the necessary level of CaMKII activity.

Initial water-maze learning by the mice was normal. But the mutant mice, unlike wild type, did not improve on their early learning. Silva believes that the mice solidify all early information—both correct and incorrect—as permanent memories that are difficult to erase.

"A weak signal to these animals is a strong signal," says Silva. "Initially that may be good." But later it may be more difficult to filter out the earlier mistakes. "The problem with bringing in a lot of garbage," says Silva, "is that it is really hard to fine-tune."

Consistent with this view, retraining the mutant mice does not work well. The fixated mice continue to respond to the original training, and ignore the new maze target.

Fine detail is also missing in another task. The mutants can learn to associate an upcoming shock with a particular cage. But when presented with two similar but different cages, the mutant mice freeze in fear in both cages, whereas wild-type mice freeze only in the cage that is identical to the cage where the shock was originally administered.

Thus, as a memory booster, this method backfires. In contrast, overexpression of CREB has been shown to enhance learning. But in these experiments the animals were in a uniform environment and had to learn specific, isolated tasks. Silva thinks that CREB boosters would not work in the complexities of a human environment because the brain would overload. "They may work for sporadic use [such as against Alzheimer's disease], but they won't work in the long term," he says. "More is not more is not more. This is not about getting more plasticity; it's about getting circuits that store more information."

Reference:

Elgersma, Y., et al. 2002. Neuron. 36:493–505.[CrossRef][Medline]

William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Full Text (PDF, 381K) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JCB Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wells, W. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Wells, W. A. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?