JCB logo
Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc.
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 24 March 2003. doi:10.1083/jcb1607iti1
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 763K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/2003/3/980 $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 160, Number 7, 980-980


In This Issue

Building and breaking the NPC



In Ran mutants, nups get stuck in vesicles (*) rather than assembling into NPCs (arrowheads).

Astudy of nuclear pore complex (NPC) assembly is revealing Ran to be a ubiquitous regulator of nuclear physiology. RanGTP gradients are essential for nuclear trafficking, spindle assembly during mitosis, and reformation of the nuclear envelope (NE) after mitosis. Now, on page 1041, Ryan et al. implicate Ran in yet another nuclear function—NPC assembly.

In a screen for budding yeast NPC mutants, the authors identified several temperature-sensitive mutations in the Ran pathway, including mutations in a Ran guanine nucleotide exchange factor, a Ran GTPase activating protein, a nuclear importer of RanGDP, and the GTPase itself. Although preexisting NPCs were stable in the mutants, newly synthesized nucleoporin proteins (nups) were mislocalized at the restrictive temperature. Rather than localizing to the NE, several peripheral and integral membrane nups were found in vesicles that accumulated throughout the cytoplasm.

Thus, RanGTP may be involved in the fusion of vesicles at the nuclear envelope. This cytoplasmic Ran function contrasts with the current dogma that GTP-bound Ran is primarily nuclear. The authors hypothesize that a yet unidentified GEF could produce RanGTP at the cytoplasmic side of the NE. Alternatively, the nuclear RanGEF Prp20 (mutations in which were isolated in this NPC screen) may have a small cytoplasmic pool that has so far gone undetected.

At the other end of the NPC lifecycle, a report on page 1055 by Lénárt et al. describes NPC disassembly as the initiating step in the breakdown of the NE preceding mitosis. The group identified two distinct phases of NE breakdown in starfish oocytes based on permeabilization of the nucleus. During the first phase, the gradual release of nups from the NPC led to a small increase in NPC permeability. In the second phase, a wave of permeabilization spread rapidly from an epicenter-like origin, and gaps appeared in the NE, possibly caused by removal of entire NPCs. Even at this point, the NE was still attached to the polymerized lamina along its inner membrane, indicating that disassembly of this network of intermediate filaments is a late step in NE breakdown. {blacksquare}



Nicole LeBrasseur

lebrasn{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Articles

The Ran GTPase cycle is required for yeast nuclear pore complex assembly
Kathryn J. Ryan, J. Michael McCaffery, and Susan R. Wente
J. Cell Biol. 2003 160: 1041-1053. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Nuclear envelope breakdown in starfish oocytes proceeds by partial NPC disassembly followed by a rapidly spreading fenestration of nuclear membranes
Péter Lénárt, Gwénaël Rabut, Nathalie Daigle, Arthur R. Hand, Mark Terasaki, and Jan Ellenberg
J. Cell Biol. 2003 160: 1055-1068. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 763K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Articles
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents