Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

This Article Full Text (PDF, 885K) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JCB Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wells, W. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Wells, W. A. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?

© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/2003/8/532 $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 162, Number 4, 532-532

Pulling backwards

Centrosome fragments (arrows) fly outwards after a centrosome center is ablated. Hyman/AAAS

One-cell worm embryos pull harder on their posterior centrosome, thus displacing the spindle toward the posterior and creating a smaller posterior cell. Now Stephan Grill, Joe Howard, Anthony Hyman (Max Planck Institute, Dresden, Germany), and colleagues have tracked centrosome fragments and determined that individual force generators at the anterior and posterior pull with equal strength, but that there are more of them at the posterior.

The fragments were liberated by ablating the central, anchoring portion of the centrosome. The fragments from the posterior centrosome flew out toward the cell cortex faster than did those from the anterior centrosome. They did not, however, fly toward a single focal point, which was a feature of some earlier models.

The simple velocity data did not distinguish between more motors or stronger motors. But after a look at the variance—the differences in the speeds of fragments from one experiment to the next—the "very messy data turned into beautiful, simple data," says Howard. Variance initially increased, but at the highest velocities actually dropped. This pattern is seen in two-state (on and off) processes as they progress from frequent, noisy switching between on and off toward consistently on states.

If motors are only ever on or off, that makes further interpretation of the data possible. At a given mean velocity, the variance was higher at the posterior. This higher variance arises because there is a greater number of noisy elements—in other words, more motors—contributing to the final value. Which all goes to show, as Howard says, that "one person's noise is another person's signal."

Reference:

Grill, S.W., et al. 2003. Science. 301:518–521.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu

CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Facebook    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This Article Full Text (PDF, 885K) PPT slides of all figures Alert me when this article is cited Services Email this article Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new content in the JCB Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wells, W. A. Search for Related Content PubMed Articles by Wells, W. A. Social Bookmarking                            What's this?