JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 8 September 2003. doi:10.1083/jcb1626rr2
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 603K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/2003/2/960-a $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 162, Number 6, 960-a-961


Research Roundup

Centromere errors get chewed out



ICIS (red, left) helps destroy invading microtubules (red, right).

Ohi/Elsevier

Microtubule (MT) ends that invade into the inner centromere may get chewed up, say Ryoma Ohi, Timothy Mitchison (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA), and colleagues. The process should help prevent MTs emanating from a single pole from attaching to both sister kinetochores.

Ohi proposes that the chewing is performed by the KinI kinesin MCAK. He found a new MT-binding protein, ICIS, that binds to MCAK, relies on it for localization at the inner centromere, and further activates MCAK's MT-depolymerizing activity in vitro.

Although ICIS depletion causes widespread MT polymerization, probably because of co-depletion of MCAK, it almost certainly has a more specific function at the inner centromere. Just away from the inner centromere—specifically near the kinetochore—a high density of MTs is desirable if the cell is to ensure kinetochore capture. "But it's also dangerous," says Ohi. Slightly errant MTs can skirt around the closest kinetochore, cross the inner centromere, and attach to the more distant kinetochore. Ohi predicts that ICIS-stimulated MCAK intercepts these MTs before they can reach their incorrect target. He now proposes to test whether interference with the MCAK/ICIS system causes attachment errors, as his model predicts. {blacksquare}

Reference:

Ohi, R., et al. 2003. Dev. Cell. 5:309–321.[CrossRef][Medline]



William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 603K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents