JCB logo
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 8 September 2003. doi:10.1083/jcb1626rr3
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 603K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/2003/2/961 $5.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 162, Number 6, 961-961


Research Roundup

Survival is sweet



BAD is needed for a proper response to glucose.

Korsmeyer/Macmillan

Nutrition and cell death are integrated in a single mitochondrial complex, according to Nika Danial, Stanley Korsmeyer (Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA), and colleagues.

The complex was discovered after gel filtration of the pro-apoptotic BAD protein, and contains BAD, a phosphatase, kinase, and kinase-anchoring protein directed at BAD, and glucokinase. In cells lacking BAD, the complex falls apart, respiration is compromised, and blood glucose regulation is abnormal. A nonphosphorylatable BAD leaves the complex intact but otherwise nonresponsive to glucose.

The results are consistent with a simple model: glucose induces phosphorylation of BAD, thus ensuring both cell survival and activation of glucokinase. The active glucokinase clears blood glucose and feeds the mitochondrion with necessary intermediates.

The presumption was always that the cell's two major survival pathways— glycolysis and apoptosis—were independent. But the complex hints at integration. Korsmeyer speculates that early cells may have relied on this direct integration with sugar levels, as the cells probably lacked fancy growth factors for modulating cell survival. "We could be looking at a primordial role between nutrition and cell death," he says. "The growth factors may have come later." This hypothesis is consistent with the ideas of Craig Thompson (University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA), who has suggested that growth factors act not directly on cell survival but via modulation of glucose levels. {blacksquare}

Reference:

Danial, N.N., et al. 2003. Nature. 424:952–956.[CrossRef][Medline]



William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 603K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents