JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published 24 November 2003. doi:10.1083/jcb1634iti5
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 574K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

© The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525/2003/11/689 $8.00
The Journal of Cell Biology, Volume 163, Number 4, 689-689


In This Issue

Barriers to export



Loss of a Nup (right) leads to excessive nuclear export.

Nuclear pores facilitate transport into and out of the nucleus. But now Roth et al. report that cells with more of the nucleoporin DNup88 do less nuclear export (page 701). DNup88 exerts this negative effect by sequestering the exportin DCRM1 so that it can no longer do its job.

Roth et al. first established that cells with DNup88 were compromised for nuclear export but not import. The overactive export in cells lacking DNup88 could be prevented by inhibiting DCRM1, which shuttles its cargos out of the nucleus. DNup88, DCRM1, and the nucleoporin DNup214 are normally found in a complex on the cytoplasmic face of the nuclear pore, but loss of DNup88 frees up DCRM1 so that it can enter the nucleus and help export more proteins.

The authors found a correlation between DNup88 levels and the effectiveness of nuclear export at different stages of fly development. Such alterations of DNup88 levels may be one way of altering the rates of export of many substrates, rather than tweaking the binding of individual substrates to DCRM1 by, for example, phosphorylation. But Roth et al. are also on the lookout for phosphorylations or other modifications of the DNup88/DCRM1 system that may alter export capability in response to specific signals. {blacksquare}



William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Article

The Drosophila nucleoporin DNup88 localizes DNup214 and CRM1 on the nuclear envelope and attenuates NES-mediated nuclear export
Peggy Roth, Nikos Xylourgidis, Nafiseh Sabri, Anne Uv, Maarten Fornerod, and Christos Samakovlis
J. Cell Biol. 2003 163: 701-706. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 574K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents