JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 9 February 2004. doi:10.1083/jcb1644rr4
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 164, Number 4, 479-479
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 458K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Winding and unwinding ATP synthase



ATP synthase turns one way to make ATP and the other to break it down.

Börsch

Like a revolving door, bacterial ATP synthase turns two ways, according to Manuel Diez, Michael Börsch (Universität Stuttgart, Germany), and colleagues. One direction makes ATP, whereas the other breaks it down.

ATP synthase is a two-component nanomotor. One part of the enzyme (F0) lies within the lipid bilayer and translocates protons across the membrane, whereas the other (F1) makes or breaks ATP. Recent studies have shown that each portion contains a subunit that turns within the rest of the protein framework, thus giving ATP synthase a reputation as a rotor. F1 rotation had been best shown during ATP hydrolysis, because the microscopy methods used needed soluble protein, but the enzyme requires a proton gradient across a membrane to make ATP.

To solve this problem, the German group used fluorescence resonance energy transfer to study the protein within liposomes, thus allowing them to create a proton gradient. In ATP synthesis mode, the enzyme adopted three sequential positions—similar to the 120° steps seen during hydrolysis with microscopy methods. However, the direction of rotation was opposite to that of hydrolysis. F0 is thought to rotate smoothly during proton translocation, so researchers next need to determine how that is translated to discrete steps in F1. Börsch also wonders how cellular conditions toggle the switch from synthesis to hydrolysis and back again. {blacksquare}

Reference:

Diez, M., et al. 2004. Nat. Struct. Biol. 11:135–141.



Nicole LeBrasseur

lebrasn{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 458K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents