JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 22 March 2004. doi:10.1083/jcb1647rr3
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 164, Number 7, 953-953
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1508K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Snaring bugs in NETs



Neutrophils trap bacteria in DNA-rich webs.

Zychlinsky

Neutrophils spill out their DNA to ensnare and kill extracellular bacteria, according to Volker Brinkmann, Arturo Zychlinsky (Max Planck, Berlin, Germany), and colleagues.

The team figured that degradative enzymes from neutrophils, if they were to be effective, should somehow be directed to meet bacteria. When they looked at elastase localization, they discovered what they call neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs). The fibrous NETs contained degradative enzymes that could destroy bacterial virulence factors, but the overall structures break down with DNase not proteases.

NET formation does not appear to be part of an apoptotic program, and cells with NETs are still alive: they do not release cytoplasmic proteins and continue to exclude vital dyes. (Neutrophils are, however, programmed to die within hours after entering the circulation.) Whether the cells with NETs can later phagocytose bacteria remains unclear.

NETs were apparently seen before by others, but their importance was not realized. Part of their antibacterial action derives from their histones. The antibacterial action of histones was noted back in 1958 by James Hirsch. He was reportedly discouraged by others who questioned the relevance of the result, based on the idea that bacteria would never see histones anyway.

Zychlinksy is now focusing on how NETs are formed, and whether they are directed at bacteria or erected as barriers in which motile bacteria will eventually be snared. {blacksquare}

Reference:

Brinkmann, V., et al. 2004. Science. 303:1532–1535.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1508K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents