JCB logo
EVOS Microscope Integrated Imaging
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 22 March 2004. doi:10.1083/jcb1647rr5
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 164, Number 7, 953-953
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1508K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Actin as stairmaster



A flexible linker allows the two halves of an FH2 dimer (blue and tan) to hold onto actin while the filament grows.

Eck/Elsevier

Simultaneously holding onto and building something is no mean feat. Yingwu Xu, Michael Eck (Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA), and colleagues find that the formin homology-2 (FH2) domain is ideally suited to the task. The apparently flexible structure of an FH2 dimer is consistent with a stair-stepping model of actin filament growth in which each half of the dimer alternately dissociates to make room for an incoming actin monomer even as the other half of the dimer maintains its grip on the actin filament.

The model did not come to Eck immediately. "We stared at the structure for about a year," he says. But then the group tried to reconcile the perfect twofold symmetry of the FH2 crystal structure with the helical alignment of actin monomers in a filament. The only way the two would come together, they realized, was if the FH2 was flexible.

A prime suspect for the source of flexibility was a linker region of FH2. It was relatively unstructured in the crystal, could be clipped by proteases, and was the only significant tie between two parts of the dimer. Sure enough, a crystal of a mutant FH2 that was still functional had a completely different orientation of the linker and thus of the two parts of FH2.

Eck believes the two structures prove flexibility rather than demonstrating the two most important orientations of the FH2 regions. Eck hopes that eventually he will see oscillations in fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) as the FH2 steps alternately close to and far away from the monomers of a growing actin filament. {blacksquare}

Reference:

Xu, Y., et al. 2004. Cell. 116:711–723.[CrossRef][Medline]



William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1508K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents