JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 5 April 2004. doi:10.1083/jcb1651iti4
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 165, Number 1, 15-15
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 742K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

In This Issue

Brain construction goes straight



Pathfinding is fine without L1–L1 binding.

Brains of mice lacking the cell adhesion molecule L1 are a mess. Failures in neural migration, pathfinding, morphogenesis, and fasciculation result in shortages of cells in various regions and aberrant architecture. But now Itoh et al. (page 145) report that homophilic binding of L1 is not necessary for axonal guidance and neuronal migration in the central nervous system (CNS).

L1 was one of the first neural cell adhesion molecules to be discovered, and its binding partners have been proliferating ever since. Many of those binding partners contact several of L1's many domains, making individual contributions difficult to tease apart. Itoh et al., however, succeed in ablating only a subset of L1's binding interactions via a deletion of L1's sixth Ig domain.

The resulting protein does not bind either to itself or to {alpha}5ß1 integrin. And yet mice expressing only this variant have brains and spinal cords that look normal. Thus, it seems that L1 homophilic binding, earlier found to mediate neurite outgrowth in vitro, is not needed for this function in the CNS.

When the L1 variant is backcrossed into another mouse strain, the progeny get hydrocephalus. This swelling of the brain results when cerebrospinal fluid is not correctly cleared from the brain ventricles. The link between L1 mutation and hydrocephalus has been noted before, in humans, but its mechanistic basis remains unclear. {blacksquare}



William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?

Related Article

Brain development in mice lacking L1–L1 homophilic adhesion
Kyoko Itoh, Ling Cheng, Yoshimasa Kamei, Shinji Fushiki, Hiroyuki Kamiguchi, Paul Gutwein, Alexander Stoeck, Bernd Arnold, Peter Altevogt, and Vance Lemmon
J. Cell Biol. 2004 165: 145-154. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 742K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Related Collections
Right arrowRelated Article
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents