JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 5 April 2004. doi:10.1083/jcb1651rr3
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 165, Number 1, 16-17
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1042K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

The two faces of Mad2



Mad2 exists in inactive (left) and active (right) forms.

Yu/Macmillan

Sequence dictates structure, but for Mad2, one structure is not enough. New results from groups led by Hongtao Yu and Josep Rizo (University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, TX) show that Mad2 adopts two distinct conformations and that checkpoint activation may consist of switching Mad2 to the right form.Mad2 holds up anaphase until every chromosome is properly attached to the spindle. Past structural studies of Mad2 showed that Mad1 (its activator), and Cdc20 (its anaphase-halting target) share the same binding site. "It would seem," says Rizo, "that [Mad1] would be a competitor rather than an activator because they bind in the same place." But the newly identified second conformation suggests an answer to this puzzle–Mad1 may put Mad2 in an active conformation that is maintained even when the Mads separate.

The two forms can be distinguished based on column chromatography and NMR. The active form has a higher affinity for Cdc20 than does the other form and blocks anaphase in oocyte extracts. In vivo, sequestration of only the active form thwarts the checkpoint.

The forms interchange in vitro very slowly. A fragment of Mad1, however, accelerates transformation of the inactive into the active form. Some Mad2 is always complexed with Mad1 in cells, so the question now is what tells Mad1 to toss off Mad2 (in its active form) so it can bind to Cdc20. {blacksquare}

Reference:

Luo, X., et al. 2004. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 10.1038/nsmb748.



Nicole LeBrasseur

lebrasn{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1042K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents