JCB logo
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 19 April 2004. doi:10.1083/jcb1652rr5
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 165, Number 2, 165-165
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1420K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Get out! And don't come back!



Only the tip20-8 mutant allows a protein to double-back to the ER for trimming.

Spang/AAAS

An active mechanism keeps vesicles that are departing the ER from turning round and fusing back to it, say Faustin Kamena and Anne Spang (Max Planck, Tübingen, Germany).

Directionality is a challenge for vesicle traffic. Although vesicles traveling from ER to Golgi and from Golgi to ER have very different job descriptions, recycling of transport proteins ensures that the compositions of the two vesicle types are similar if not identical. The two vesicle types start off with different coats (COPII for ER to Golgi and COPI for Golgi to ER) but shed them soon after departure.

Kamena and Spang figured that vesicles departing from the ER might be prevented from doing a U-turn by the same ER machinery that welcomes fusion of Golgi-derived vesicles. Sure enough, a mutant of the ER protein Tip20p allowed COPII vesicles, recently departed from the ER, to fuse back to the ER.

The researchers were lucky that they tested two different Tip20p mutants. Only one of those mutants (tip20–8, and not tip20–5 or any of the other ER fusion mutants) showed the U-turn phenotype. Now, the team can look for suppressor mutations that rescue tip20–8 but not tip20–5, and isolate proteins that bind only one of the two mutant proteins. Either approach may give clues about what, exactly, is sensed as different about a departing versus an arriving vesicle. {blacksquare}

Reference:

Kamena, F., and A. Spang. 2004. Science. 304:286–289.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 1420K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents