JCB logo
amgmicro.com
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 17 May 2004. doi:10.1083/jcb1654rr5
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 165, Number 4, 457-457
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 843K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Making waves



Multiple shorter steps are better at preserving oscillations.

Oudenaarden/Macmillan

Waves of activity need some help in propagating through a cell cycle, according to Attila Becskei, Monica Boselli, and Alexander van Oudenaarden (MIT, Cambridge, MA).

Each transcriptional wave from a yeast cell cycle promoter lasts 20–25 min; so stringing together 3 or 4 of them should allow the construction of a simple 90-min cell cycle. But, says van Oudenaarden, "if you didn't optimize the system, the cell cycle waves get washed out very easily. Within a quarter or a third of a 90-minute cycle, the waves are almost completely gone."

Rather than investigating every last detail of real cell cycle oscillators, the MIT group built, both in yeast cells and in silico, a simple circuit that transmits cell cycle–like oscillations. They found that a slow process such as transcription (and the lengthy persistence of the resulting mRNA) led to a loss of the initial periodicity information from a cell cycle promoter.

A faster process, such as accelerated nuclear import, gave a shorter delay but maintained the high peak-to-trough information of the original oscillation. Stringing together a series of such fast processes, such as protein modifications, should give accurate oscillations of approximately the correct duration. The high peak-to-trough ratio can also be restored with feedback loops and nonlinear activation and degradation steps. All of these tricks were known to exist in the cell cycle, but the MIT group has now established why they are necessary. {blacksquare}

Reference:

Becskei, A., et al. 2004. Nat. Cell Biol. 6:451–457.[CrossRef][Medline]



William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 843K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents