JCB logo
Quantitative Colocalization Analysis Software
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 28 June 2004. doi:10.1083/jcb1661rr3
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 166, Number 1, 9-9
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 682K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Caterpillar compaction



DNA compacted with MukBEF extends in an ordered sequence as each complex releases its loop of DNA.

Bustamante/AAAS

DNA compaction, say Ryan Case, Yun-Pei Chang, Nicholas Cozzarelli, Carlos Bustamante, and colleagues (University of California, Berkeley, CA), may work via a cooperative caterpillar-like mechanism.

The caterpillar is formed by multiple copies of condensin protein—in this case MukBEF—with each V-shaped condensin contributing two legs. Compaction occurs when the caterpillar's legs snap together.

"The main problem," says Bustamante, "is that we have not had any bulk assay for [the compaction activity of] this protein. We decided to do a rather risky search for a single molecule assay."

The assay involved binding MukBEF to DNA and then holding both ends of the compacted DNA strand using a dual beam optical trap. As the DNA strand was pulled, it gave way in a sawtooth pattern as individual copies of MukBEF stayed on the DNA but splayed apart to release their captured loops of DNA. The size of each peak depended on just how much DNA was released per event.

MukBEF binding was cooperative, so the proteins opened up in a set sequence starting at one end. Thus, after recondensing, restretching gave the exact same sawtooth pattern.

The open V of MukBEF may span 200bp or more. ATP binding (but not hydrolysis) may drive compaction by closing the V. In vivo, however, DNA is already compacted by other proteins and supercoiled, so each condensin would reach across many kilobases of DNA. Bustamante hopes to establish a bulk assay for condensin action so that he can see this process occur in real time. {blacksquare}

Reference:

Case, R.B., et al. 2004. Science. 10.1126/science.1098225.



William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 682K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents