JCB logo
R&D Systems: New Poster Available
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 28 June 2004. doi:10.1083/jcb1661rr4
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 166, Number 1, 9-9
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 682K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

A message before dying



Death induction causes excess proliferation (white; right, posterior).

Hay/Elsevier

When a tissue is damaged, cells proliferate just enough to fill in the gap. Jun Huh, Bruce Hay (Caltech, Pasadena, CA), and colleagues now suggest that dying cells produce a signal promoting the multiplication of their surviving neighbors.

This type of compensatory proliferation has been recognized for almost 30 years. But the Caltech group stumbled upon the initiating signal while studying downstream mediators of the fly cell death activator Hid. To avoid the "confounding effects" of cell death in these studies they were coexpressing p35, which inhibits downstream caspase enzymes and thus prevents cell death. The result of this fake death regime was enlarged tissues thanks to a 2–4-fold increase in proliferation. "We wondered if it was these undead cells that were sending the [proliferation] signal," says Hay.

Hid kills cells by interfering with the stability and action of DIAP1, a caspase inhibitor. Reduction in DIAP1 levels did not, however, stimulate the compensatory proliferation effect. By contrast, expression of an upstream caspase called Dronc was both necessary and sufficient.

The response with Dronc but not low DIAP1 suggests that some of the upstream machinery remains obscure. Another uncertainty is the proliferation-related target of Dronc. Finding protease targets is not easy to do biochemically, so Hay will probably screen for genetic enhancers or suppressors of the compensatory proliferation phenotype. {blacksquare}

Reference:

Huh, J.R., et al. 2004. Curr. Biol. 10.1016/S0960982204004191.



William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 682K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents