JCB logo
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 4 October 2004. doi:10.1083/jcb1671rr4
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 167, Number 1, 15-15
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 530K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Immune synapses make a choice


The immunological synapse between T cells and the antigen-presenting dendritic cells acts as a locus for T cell activation. Now, Roberto Maldonado, Laurie Glimcher (Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA), and colleagues find that this synapse also helps the T cells decide between two different activated, differentiated fates based on the extent of colocalization of receptors at the synapse.

The end products of this decision are the bacteria-fighting Th1 cells and the parasite-fighting Th2 cells. Activation of the interferon-{gamma} receptor (IFNGR) or interleukin 4 receptor (IL-4R) is known to favor Th1 production or Th2 production, respectively.

Now, Glimcher's group shows that the IFNGR but not IL-4R colocalizes with the T cell receptor (TCR) at the immunological synapse. The extent of this colocalization is greatest in mice that tend to generate more Th1 cells. IL-4, which favors production of Th2 cells, inhibits the colocalization.

Turning this colocalization correlation into causation will take more experiments. For example, cross-linking of the IFNGR and TCR might generate Th1 cells even in the Th2-favoring presence of IL-4. For now, the group points out that colocalization of the two receptors at the synapse puts the IFNGR near the source of its ligand and may set up a positive feedback between activation and differentiation pathways. {rr_end}

Reference:

Maldonado, R.A., et al. 2004. Nature. doi:10.1038/nature02916.



William A. Wells

wellsw{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 530K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Wells, W. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents