JCB logo
Avanti Polar Lipids, Inc.
  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents

Published online 13 December 2004. doi:10.1083/jcb1676rr4
The Rockefeller University Press, 0021-9525 $8.00
JCB, Volume 167, Number 6, 995-995
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 280K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Research Roundup

Time keepers abound



Oscillations can be seen in gene expression patterns of individual fibroblasts.

SCHIBLER/ELSEVIER

Every cell in the body has its own little clock, according to Emi Nagoshi, Ueli Schibler (University of Geneva, Switzerland), and colleagues. These peripheral clocks may be closely related to the body's central clock—the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN).

Neurons of the SCN maintain circadian gene expression for long periods of time. Other cells, however, were thought to rely on the SCN to maintain their oscillations, as the amplitude of gene expression oscillations in fibroblast cultures lessens rapidly with time in culture. But Schibler's group shows that the examination of mass cultures masks the continued ability of each cell to maintain strong oscillations.

By looking at individual fibroblasts, the authors were able to see persistent oscillations. Even after mitosis, daughter cells continued the rhythm of the mother, although with a slight phase shift, probably due to the transient suspension of transcription. Mitosis itself is also gated by the oscillations, although the cellular advantage to this gating is unclear.

Mathematical modeling suggested that global culture oscillations are diluted over time by slight differences in the periodicities of each cell's clock. Resynchronization was achieved in cultured cells by activation of a wide variety of signaling pathways, which reset all cells to a common point. In animals, peripheral clocks are synchronized by feeding cycles, which depend on sleep–wake cycles. As the SCN controls sleep cycles, it automatically synchronizes the oscillations in peripheral cell types. {rr_end}

Reference:

Nagoshi, E., et al. 2004. Cell. 119:693–705.[Medline]



Nicole LeBrasseur

lebrasn{at}rockefeller.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF, 280K)
Right arrow PPT slides of all figures
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Services
Right arrow Email this article
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new content in the JCB
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by LeBrasseur, N.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Facebook   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?


  Home | Help | Feedback | Subscriptions | Archive | Search | Table of Contents